Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (143508)	4/5/2020 6:51:01 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 222359

Why he kept him on so long in the first place is a mystery... GZ

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (143508)	4/5/2020 1:01:13 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brian Sullivan Respond to of 222359

Also, in the recent FISA review by the OIG the DOJ inspector general specifically identified issues with the "accuracy reviews" conducted by DOJ-NSD chief legal counsel. Who was that former DOJ-NSD chief legal counsel? That would be current ICIG Michael Atkinson[.] This is the KEY operative paragraph. Maybe not here, but months ago on various social media, I was pointing out that Atkinson was likely trying to use the WB scenario as a defense against all of the soon to be uncovered illegalities that occurred under his legal stewardship while at NSD.. EVERY FAKE FISA application went through his fingers.. Meaning he LIED to the FISA court to illegally obtain FISA warrants against US Citizens, and especially the Trump Campaign. Every other signatory on those FISA applications RELIED upon his legal opinion that they were in order. So.. as ICIG, he sets up a scenario of a WB, where if he gets in trouble from Horowitz's review of FISA, he can assert that it is "retaliation" against him for the WB issue. Hawk