SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (5179)4/6/2020 9:32:15 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 13796
 
It is ridiculous how casually Donald Trump and Boris Johnson treated SARS-CoV-2 and how cavalierly they refused to prepare their countries for the pandemic.

With Boris on a ventilator, karmic balance now only requires Donnie Trump on a ventilator choking on his own blather.

I've heard karma's a bitch. It's just not always instant.



Karma may yet start chasing lying Brazilians around Africa next and Wisconsin douchebags around Houston. Fun and entertainment for all to witness.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (5179)4/7/2020 12:29:19 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13796
 
Boris will come out immune. People who have been quarantine, will come out with NO immunity



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (5179)4/7/2020 10:38:22 AM
From: elmatador1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pak73

  Respond to of 13796
 
Tide is turning against China. While before it was most viewed as Trump American protectionism, it is becoming a worldwide phenomenon.

Covid is creating a common front against Xi Jinping China.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (5179)4/10/2020 8:52:13 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 13796
 
“What the United States can do is just simply seize the treasury obligations that China holds in their own name, they hold a little more than a trillion U.S. dollars in treasuries, probably through nominees they hold some more.”

Chang continued, “But what I recommend is that we not do this alone, and the reason is that China would say that this was a repudiation of debt. They would say that we were bad stewards of the global financial system. They would just tar us and they would actually go after the dollar.”

“What we can do is work with the issuers of other major currencies,” added Chang. “For instance, the Canadian dollar, the pound, the Swiss Franc, the euro, the yen, if we were to do that, and if all these countries were going to confiscate assets, then we have the makings of a real solution.”


Gordon Chang: U.S. Should Seize China’s $1 Trillion in Treasury Obligations as Coronavirus Compensation


America can seize China’s holdings of U.S. Treasury obligations as compensation for the one-party state’s negligence related to the coronavirus pandemic, said Gordon Chang, Daily Beast columnist and author of The Great U.S.-China Tech War, offering his remarks on Monday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with host Rebecca Mansour and special guest host Ed Martin.

China owns approximately $1.2 trillion in U.S. Treasury holdings.
Chang said, “What the United States can do is just simply seize the treasury obligations that China holds in their own name, they hold a little more than a trillion U.S. dollars in treasuries, probably through nominees they hold some more.”

Chang continued, “But what I recommend is that we not do this alone, and the reason is that China would say that this was a repudiation of debt. They would say that we were bad stewards of the global financial system. They would just tar us and they would actually go after the dollar.”

“What we can do is work with the issuers of other major currencies,” added Chang. “For instance, the Canadian dollar, the pound, the Swiss Franc, the euro, the yen, if we were to do that, and if all these countries were going to confiscate assets, then we have the makings of a real solution.”

Chang said, “Of course, we can never get enough to compensate the world for what happened. We’ve got lives lost, and even if you were just to look at this as a financial play, the amount that we could seize would be far less than the damage China has caused. But the important thing for us is that we’ve got to deter future bad actors, because if the Chinese get away with this, then others will think that they can do the same thing.”

Chang warned, “This is probably not the last pandemic that comes from China.”

“What China did was deliberately make the world sick,” concluded Chang. “It’s hard to understand that, but … but Beijing took actions that would inevitably lead to other nations not protecting themselves, and that would mean the spread of this disease, infecting many, killing some. This is how malevolent Beijing has been. We have got to start defending ourselves, and one way to do this is to teach a lesson that Beijing will never forget.”

Breitbart News Tonight broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot channel 125 weeknights from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern or 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific.





To: Maurice Winn who wrote (5179)4/15/2020 2:45:33 AM
From: elmatador1 Recommendation

Recommended By
3bar

  Respond to of 13796
 
Coronavirus: Economic turmoil from Covid-19 massively reduces wealth of the super-rich

Rob Stock05:00, Apr 12 2020

Wealthy people with cash to deploy tend to grow their fortunes when economic crises end and recovery begins, says Jeff Matthews, a Forsyth Barr investment adviser.

"Most of them end up being wealthier because they have the cash, or funding lines available, so they are able to pick up bargains," Matthews says..

"Ordinary people don't have that ability to go out and buy a whole lot of Auckland Airport or Heartland Bank shares, if they think they are good value."

The rich aren't different from ordinary folk, Matthews says. "They are just regular people with more zeroes in their bank accounts than the rest of us."

ies



Rod Duke says wealthy people do not track their wealth on a daily basis.
While wealthy people's assets take a hit in crises, they do not enter panic mode, providing their wealth is not built on an edifice of suddenly unsustainable debt.

And if they have cash to invest when prices are low, they can position themselves to profit from rebounds in share and property prices, Matthews says

This was a strategy most famously adopted by legendary investor Warren Buffett which he outlined in a New York Times column in the immediate aftermath of the global financial crisis, saying he would be buying American company shares at bargain prices because it made sense to "be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful".

Briscoe Group majority owner and managing director Rod Duke says he has taken an eye-watering wealth hit from Covid-19, but he is not panicked.

Duke's 77 per cent stake in the retail group that owns Briscoes, Rebel Sport, and Living and Giving, was worth around $775 million in January before United States and New Zealand Covid-19 panic set in.

His stake is now worth around $505m, having at its lowest point hit just under $400m.

Duke is no longer drawing a wage from Briscoe Group, and the dividends he was being paid, which totalled more than $33m in the past financial year, have been suspended.

But Briscoe shares were being valued as a result of other people, not Duke selling them. And on March 20, he bought another 216,000 of them.

"If you sat down and tracked all the purchases and sale of Briscoe shares over the last 19 years, the one thing that would be abundantly clear is that I am not a seller. I have never sold," he says.

In March Kein Geld (NZ) a company in which Duke is a shareholder, bought just over 200,000 shares in Briscoe.

The reason he keeps buying, Duke says, is that Briscoe has been a great investment, evidenced in it increasing its dividend for each of the past 18 half-years.



GETTY-IMAGES
Investor Warren Buffet's view is buy when there's blood in the streets.
When asked how he feels about the $300m-odd drop in his wealth, he says, he doesn't feel anything.

"I don't think about it."

His eye remains on the long-term value of Briscoe, and he does not track the daily movements to see how his wealth was increasing, or decreasing.

"None of my friends, who have been relatively successful, do that either," he says.

Duke sold his Auckland waterfront mansion late last year.

There are other big shareholders in listed companies whose wealth declines can be tracked by share price movements.

Members of the Hill family, of Michael Hill jewellers, had 483 million shares in the NZX listed company.

They were worth 76 cents at their high point on January 13, and are around 25c cents last week, making for a drop in value from just under $370m to just over $120m.

But some very wealthy people's wealth is in unlisted assets, which are not priced daily, making their rises and falls in wealth trickier to track.

New Zealand's richest person Graeme Hart's Rank Group is not listed on any sharemarket.

But US wealth publication Forbes estimates the wealth of the world's billionaires, continually updating its estimate of their "real time net worth".

Forbes estimated Hart was the world's 127th richest person on March 8, with a real time net wealth of US$11.5b based on estimates of value for his packaging empire, which makes everyday products such as milk cartons, paper and aluminium foil.

In late December, Forbes estimated Hart's net worth at US$10b.



STUFF
Sir Michael Hill has seen his paper wealth dip as shares in his jewellery company fell in price.
"People tend to get wealthy by concentrating their wealth, having a mass of money in Microsoft, or Apple," Matthews says.

But once they've made a fortune, they tend to diversify to reduce the risk of losing that fortune, he says.

That often means diversifying into property, which Duke has done though several properties he owns in Auckland that have Briscoe Group shops as tenants, as well as buying into other businesses either directly, or through bespoke share portfolios put together for them by investment advisers.

Property values remain unclear at this point in time with the real estate market having ground to a near lockdown halt.

Of the top 20 people on New Zealand's rich list, almost half built their wealth through property investment, including Sir Michael Friedlander, worth $1.85 billion with an "empire of office buildings, retail strips and industrial properties," according to the NBR Rich List.

The wealthy have other advantages in a crisis.

They tend to be able to make use of tax losses in recovery phases, while ordinary people whose wealth is in their homes and KiwiSaver, cannot, Matthews says.

Wealthy people also tend to have advisers, who can help them take action, such as sweeping in to buy up unloved stock in a company, or locate them bargain investment properties.

Though it has not happened in New Zealand, a crisis can lead to tax breaks for the rich being slipped through unnoticed by the voting masses, as has happened in the US, which means they stand to do well during the recovery phase.



GETTY
New Zealand's richest person is Graeme Hart.
The rich are good at weathering crises, and overseas and in New Zealand, it's been observed many head to out-of-town second homes to distance themselves from centres of viral activity, a tradition going back to the outbreaks of plagues in Medieval Europe, captured in stories and reportage, such as Boccaccio's Decameron and Daniel Defoe's Journal of a Plague Year.

But in the age of social media, it has become harder for wealthy business leaders not to share some taste of workers' pain.

Across listed companies, whose share prices have plunged on the NZX, executives and directors have been giving themselves pay cuts.

If those pay cuts aren't deep enough, protests can force them to dig deeper.

That happened to Fletcher Building chief executive Ross Taylor, who was forced to increase his temporary pay reduction from 15 per cent to 30 per cent, after Fletcher employees protested.

The workers had been forced to take a 70 per cent pay cut for 12 weeks.

In an open letter, the wife of one Fletcher Building worker told Taylor: "I do wonder about how you justify taking only a 15 per cent pay cut when you earn well in excess of half a million dollars a year, hard work and sleepless nights at present or not, while we have to worry about having money to buy milk and bread."



JASON DORDAY/STUFF
Fletcher Building chief executive Ross Taylor was forced to take a bigger pay cut than he had been planning.
But leaders in some industries, like banking and insurance, remain more sheltered, and have so far not announced they will be taking pay cuts.

Most senior executives are exposed to falls in the value of shares in the companies they lead. ASB chief executive Vittoria Shortt held shares in ASB's parent bank Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) worth 113 per cent of her base pay at June 30 last year. Her base pay was A$965,550 (NZ$1m)

At the end of June, shares in CBA were worth A$83. On April 8, they were worth A$59.81.