Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Laserbones who wrote (7005)	1/27/1998 2:33:00 AM
From: Tim Gardner	Respond to of 11888

Im with you Greg -- but as far as AIPN stands, if there is a decent amount of oil we will be rich -- if there isn't we won't -- What happens to Clinton or the Asian markets won't effect the amount of oil in the ground. That's what I'm betting on, not on who slept with who. If you are a short term player at this point then going to a cash position is wise -- Short term -- but I'm happy with what I'm currently holding and have no expectations of selling any of it. When AIPN hits 10+ then I might take a little profit.

To: Laserbones who wrote (7005)	1/27/1998 7:59:00 AM
From: qdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11888

This is true about the uncertainty. Markets, generally don't like it. Look at markets in past Presidential crisis's. No matter what our political leaning are, during Clinton's watch the market went from 3600 to 8200, as measure by the Dow. Some can argue that it's not Clinton, but Greenspan. I can also apply that same argument that it wasn't Reagan, but Volker, who also set it up for Greenspan. I think I made myself sick, now I have to admit that Carter did a good job. Not going to do it......... What concern me isn't so much Clinton, but this decision by the Supreme Court is going to affect future Presidents as well, both Dem and Rep. I can't sue the military, but I can sue a sitting President. Somehow, this isn't good.