SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (156453)4/13/2020 11:51:29 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217540
 
Tsla broke 600 from downside

Not going to pay attention until / unless it breaks 650

So that a signal to short 1000 strikes at greater time distances



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (156453)5/2/2020 1:40:10 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Dr. Voodoo

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217540
 
Re <<TSLA ... gold bars>>

Tesla seems to be simultaneous, an auto assembler, battery developer, autonomous software developer, a dash of flash, a splash of hype, and a religious following for a brash leader.

The company is perfect albeit mark-to-market risky as a Near-perpetual-power cash generator for speculators

bloomberg.com

Elon Musk Is Right About Tesla's Stock

It is priced way too high, though investors might have preferred he not mention it.
Liam DenningMay 1, 2020, 7:34 PM GMT+2



He’s not wrong.

Photographer: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images

Liam Denning is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy, mining and commodities. He previously was editor of the Wall Street Journal's Heard on the Street column and wrote for the Financial Times' Lex column. He was also an investment banker.
Read more opinion Follow @liamdenning on Twitter

LISTEN TO ARTICLE
So what do we call Elon Musk’s latest? Funding unsecured?



That was enough to send Tesla Inc.’s stock plunging by as much as 13% on Friday, a cool $18 billion or so. One imagines those analysts who gushed about the peanut-sized profits announced all of two days ago are racing to update their models. In a way, the CEO’s tweet does a service, emphasizing once again that Tesla’s stock price is an emotional, not financial, construct.

Getting Too HighElon Musk's claim that Tesla's stock price is too high was made as it traded around the level of the last equity raise

Source: Bloomberg

It’s also a kick in the teeth for investors. In February, Tesla sold $2.3 billion of new shares at $767 apiece. When Musk put thumb to touchscreen on Friday, the “too high” stock was trading at about $761. I guess the assumed discount rate must have changed or something in the intervening two months or so.

It should have, obviously, given the Covid-19 pandemic piling more risk onto Tesla’s already less-than-utility-like model. Indeed, much as Musk’s “funding secured” debacle in 2018 coincided with his frustration about short sellers and Tesla’s struggles with the Model 3, this week’s antics come at a time of increased stress.

Wednesday’s earnings call was going rather well — by its peculiar, stage-managed standards — until Musk created a storm by declaring disease-related lock-downs to be “fascist.” While that may reflect a deep libertarian streak, such a stance would seem at odds with running a business that has relied on billions in subsidies and is now expanding in China. Possibly, it reflects anxiety about what the continuing suspension of activity at Tesla’s main factory in California means for cash flow.

I had suspected Tesla might soon seek to raise more capital to offset that risk. In a way, a lower price would help with that. Although you also have to wonder how underwriters could square the risk of the CEO intervening suddenly to crater the stock price. On the other hand, everyone somehow learned to live with his earlier, similar intervention pushing it the other way.

Once again, we must ask where the board stands on all this. Tesla revealed earlier this week that Musk will provide directors and officers liability insurance for a year after regular insurers quoted “disproportionately high premiums” for some unfathomable reason. It is a peculiar, and yet distinctly Teslarian arrangement, with Musk embedded at the center as both risk factor and underwriter. Friday’s bizarre episode fits the mold perfectly.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Liam Denning at ldenning1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Mark Gongloff at mgongloff1@bloomberg.net

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Sent from my iPad



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (156453)5/2/2020 3:35:24 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217540
 
Re <<TSLA>>

Lots of stories ... starting with

Headlines



bloomberg.com

Greenlight’s Einhorn Exits GM, Doubts Tesla Board’s Independence

David WelchMay 1, 2020, 4:31 PM GMT+2



David Einhorn Photographer: Alex Flynn/Bloomberg
LISTEN TO ARTICLE
Hedge fund manager David Einhorn summed up a five-year investment in General Motors Co. as “a disappointment” and criticized Tesla Inc. for the second time in as many days.

Greenlight Capital exited GM because the coronavirus pandemic has eliminated any chance the carmaker will do a minimal share repurchase this year, Einhorn wrote in a letter to investors Friday. A costly 40-day labor strike last year consumed most of the cash flow the automaker would have otherwise generated, he said.

“Our hopes that 2020 would finally be the year were dashed,” Einhorn, 51, said of his reaction to GM’s investor day in February. The Detroit-based company’s shares fell 6.2% on Friday and have plunged 43% this year.

Einhorn said Greenlight has limited losses from betting against Tesla by using put spreads to short the electric-car maker. He wrote that Tesla’s accounts receivables “remain a source of mystery” a day after questioning Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk about the company’s billing practices on Twitter.

Einhorn also blasted Tesla’s board over an arrangement the company disclosed in a regulatory filing Tuesday. The company said it decided not to renew its directors’ and officers’ liability policy for 2019 and 2020 due to “disproportionately high” premiums quoted by insurers. Musk, 48, instead agreed to personally provide coverage for a year.

“This creates an obvious conflict of interest that cripples the directors’ ability to curtail Musk’s behavior -- as he can now threaten that if the board brought him down, the insurance may not have value,” Einhorn wrote. “Making the directors so beholden to Musk by definition makes them not independent.”

Tesla said in its filing earlier this week that its board had concluded the arrangement with its CEO would not impair the independent judgment of his fellow directors.

Hours after Einhorn sent out his letter, Musk sent out more than a dozen tweets in a span of less than a 75 minutes that sent Tesla shares plunging. The stock closed down 10% after the CEO wrote that it was trading too high. He wrote later that he is optimistic about the company in the long term.

Read More: Einhorn’s Greenlight Hedge Funds Extend Slump in April

— With assistance by Joshua Fineman

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Sent from my iPad



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (156453)5/2/2020 3:37:29 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217540
 
Re <<TSLA>>

bloomberg.com

Elon Musk and Tesla Bulls Are So Over This Covid-19 Panic

First-quarter earnings numbers are meaningless, in more ways than one.
Liam DenningApril 30, 2020, 1:53 AM GMT+2



TFW you are over it.

Photographer: PETER PARKS/AFP/Getty Images

Liam Denning is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy, mining and commodities. He previously was editor of the Wall Street Journal's Heard on the Street column and wrote for the Financial Times' Lex column. He was also an investment banker.
Read more opinion Follow @liamdenning on Twitter

LISTEN TO ARTICLE
Tesla’s earnings — as in the numbers, rather than the show — are essentially meaningless.

Case in point: $16 million. That’s Tesla Inc.’s GAAP net income for the first quarter. It was a surprise relative to the consensus estimate. Two things, though: First, that consensus has been dropping like a stone. Second, the earnings are vastly more than explained by a surge in Tesla’s sales of greenhouse-gas emission credits to $354 million, more than double the average for last year 1 . Those credits also boosted Tesla’s reported gross margin on automotive sales to 25.5% from an underlying 20%, a number that itself lacks details until we get the 10Q filing.

Yet, on the back of this, Tesla’s market cap rose by another $21 billion in aftermarket trading. Indeed, since another surprise profit in October kicked off a surge in Tesla’s market cap, it has risen by more than $115 billion. Sum total of earnings reported in that time: $264 million. Credits sold: $621 million. I would say “you do the math,” but let’s face it, who does?

For many companies, this earnings season is simultaneously dreadful and, because of Covid-19, excusable. Yet it’s worth remembering the worst of it hit the U.S. in April. Tesla didn’t even suspend operations at its main plant in Fremont, California, until the last week of the month (and even then, only after some back-and-forth with local officials). Tesla’s announcement Wednesday evening should be read in this context.

Liquidity is all in the middle of this pandemic, and Tesla noted up top its cash balance increased by $1.8 billion to more than $8 billion. Recall, however, Tesla raised $2.3 billion by selling new shares in February. Actual free cash flow for the quarter, as in cash from operations less capital expenditure, was negative $895 million. In other words, Tesla burned through almost 40% of the cash it raised.

Similar to last year, Tesla also kicked off 2020 by under-spending relative to capex guidance provided two months ago. Had it met even the low end of that range, then cash burn would have been closer to $1.1 billion. A counter-argument might be Covid-19 had already begun to affect spending decisions last quarter. But Tesla noted Wednesday it continues to invest “significantly” in its products and aims to grow capacity quickly.

Another counter-argument is that Tesla suffered a build-up in inventory of almost $1 billion. This makes more sense given disruption was spreading across the world in March. However, it also points to the pressures building this quarter.

If Covid-19 suddenly went away and activity returned to normal, then that inventory pile-up would unwind quickly. But that is unlikely to happen. While Tesla’s new factory in Shanghai is getting up to speed, lock-downs mean it will likely be several more weeks at least before the more important U.S. plants are back up and running.

I don’t think it’s an accident that CEO Elon Musk, who in early March dismissed the coronavirus panic as “dumb,” took to Twitter again on Tuesday evening to demand that (Someone? The cosmos? Bots?) “FREE AMERICA NOW.” On Wednesday’s call, he characterized the lock-downs as — limber up your eyeballs for a good old roll now — “fascist.”

Meanwhile, the backdrop remains a deep recession hitting vehicle sales worldwide. Tesla held off revising full-year vehicle sales guidance. But since it implies a jump of more than one-third, year over year, through the rest of 2020, it can safely be ignored. The company’s statement about managing costs and working capital carefully is more relevant.

The combination of the past quarter’s cash burn, this quarter’s likely worse cash burn, and the murky outlook means the odds we could see another equity raise this year are rising. All the familiar narrative elements — China, Model Y, new factories, self-driving and even the elusive Semi truck — were on display Wednesday.

And, given the stock price, investors appear ready for it. Dilution seems of no concern. Indeed, even if the stock stayed flat at Wednesday’s close, then Musk would be in line to get the first tranche, worth 1% of shares outstanding, of his gigantic stock-award program set up in 2018. This is dependent on Tesla hitting various metrics, including averaging at least $100 billion of market cap over 30 days and six months.

Pay DayAt the current Tesla stock price, Musk will qualify for the first of his giant equity awards by next week

Source: Bloomberg

Note: Tesla's average market cap. Data beyond April 29, 2020 assume Tesla's stock price remains flat.

If someone was paying $900 for Tesla’s stock in February and, despite everything in between, almost $900 on Wednesday evening, then they aren’t just looking beyond Covid-19. Their time horizon may stretch beyond whenever the next pandemic turns up. Who needs earnings?

See this for an explanationofthese.



This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Liam Denning at ldenning1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Mark Gongloff at mgongloff1@bloomberg.net

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Sent from my iPad



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (156453)5/2/2020 3:40:03 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217540
 
Re <<TSLA>>

bloomberg.com

Tesla’s Surprise Profit Fails to Allay Analysts’ Restart Worries

Joe EastonApril 30, 2020, 1:25 PM GMT+2
Tesla Inc. shares jumped 9% in pre-market trading after the U.S. electric carmaker reported a surprise quarterly profit, though analyst views on the report were mixed.

The company is seeing strong demand in China, but faces uncertainty over the timing of a restart to production in Fremont, California after restrictions were imposed due to the coronavirus. The period may have also benefited from temporarily low capital expenditure.

Analysts at Piper Sandler and CFRA raised their price targets while Citigroup Inc.’s Itay Michaeli said the report was unlikely to settle any bull versus bear debates. The stock heads into Thursday’s trading already up more than 90% in 2020.



Here’s a summary of what analysts have to say:

Wedbush, Daniel IvesNeutralPrice target $425An impressive performance, delivering a profit against negative Street expectations.

While the rest of the world is shut down, strong Model 3 demand out of China remains a ray of light for Tesla.

Should further fuel the parabolic rally.

Piper Sandler, Alexander PotterOverweightRaises price target to $939 from $819Once again, profitability and capital efficiency necessitate upward earnings estimate revisions.

Gross margins are persistently “stout.” Even with aggressive capacity expansion, capex continues to be lower than expected.

“We are increasingly starting to ask ourselves: with Tesla in this market, how will competitors stay relevant?”

CFRA, Garrett NelsonHoldPrice target raised to $775 from $480First-quarter earnings were “well ahead” of expectations as auto gross margins expanded.

However, there’s a lack of visibility given no news regarding the restart of the all-important Fremont factory that accounts for over 70% of vehicle production.

Morgan Stanley, Adam JonasEqual-weightPrice target $440Quarter was modestly more constructive than bearish. Customer deposits increased, suggesting minimal order cancellation.

Guidance suspension is understandable given uncertainty, but may disappoint some.

Expects firm to burn a lot of cash in second quarter, but not many investors will doubt its financial strength.

Citi, Itay MichaeliSellPrice target $246While we agree that Tesla appeared to manage well through a challenging quarter, the profit was more than explained by regulatory credits.

Lower opex and capex, a large free cash flow burn and the lack of an April cash update are offsetting factors.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Sent from my iPad



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (156453)5/2/2020 3:47:12 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217540
 
Re <<TSLA>>

Unclear California ready to play ball ...

reuters.com

Tesla to extend furlough for some employees by another week: internal email

FILE PHOTO: A view of Tesla Inc's U.S. vehicle factory in Fremont, California, U.S., March 18, 2020. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

(Reuters) - Tesla Inc ( TSLA.O) told furloughed employees on Friday that they will remain out of work for at least another week, postponing a plan to resume normal operations on May 4 at its San Francisco vehicle-assembly plant, according to an internal email.

“For furloughed employees, unless you are contacted by your manager about a start date, you will remain on furlough until further notice, at least for another week,” the company’s in-house counsel Valerie Capers Workman said in the email, which was sent to employees and seen by Reuters.

Tesla suspended production at its Fremont, California plant on March 24.

The extension comes days after health officials from San Francisco County, along with five other Bay Area counties, said they would revise “shelter-in-place” orders that are set to expire on Sunday.

The new orders will keep the restrictions in place and extend them through May, with limited easing for a small number of low-risk activities.

The company was not immediately available to a Reuter’s request for comment.

The electric carmaker last month furloughed all non-essential workers and implemented salary cuts during a shutdown of its U.S. production facilities because of the coronavirus outbreak.

Reporting by Aakriti Bhalla in Bengaluru and Tina Bellon in New York; Editing by Stephen Coates

Sent from my iPad