SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KERM'S KORNER -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crocodile who wrote (8687)1/27/1998 3:53:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1998 (2)

NYMEX

Crude oil futures in New York staged a powerful rally Monday after talk of a possible U.S. military strike in the oil-rich Middle East Gulf ignited heavy short covering.

''The huge short position held by speculators was like a time-bomb ticking everyday, and today it finally went off,'' said Pat Hughes, analyst with Chevron Corp [NYSE:CHV] in Walnut Creek, California.

Crude for March delivery on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) settled up $1.08 a barrel at $16.82. March crude rose as much as $1.58 to $17.32 late session, the highest level for the nearby contract since early January and the largest point gain for crude in almost a year.

Analysts said the rally was probably not a decisive end to a four-month old bear market which has sent oil prices down 30 percent to their lowest levels since April 1994. But, they said the rally certainly left the market at a crossroads where further 44-month lows were no longer probable.

''The fundamentals of the market are still bearish. But, while prices may still be generally depressed for the next couple of months, prices may now turn volatile enough where we could see prices even higher than today,'' said Hughes.

Dealers said heavy short covering by funds was triggered on news over the weekend that the U.S. is moving closer to deciding whether to launch a military strike on Iraq but has made no decision on the matter.

On Saturday, President Bill Clinton met with his foreign policy advisers to discuss Iraq's continued refusal to allow unfettered inspections by U.N. officials seeking to root out and eliminate Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

Then, on Monday, the U.S. State Department said time was ''running out'' for a diplomatic solution to the weapons standoff with Iraq.

''We don't know what is going to happen with Iraq, so this short covering may not be a temporary phenomenon,'' said John Saucer, analyst with Salomon Smith Barney in Houston.

Dealers noted Iraqi oil sales could conceivably continue uninterrupted even with military strikes since the U.N. and the U.S. have not linked the row over weapons inspections to the U.N. oil-for-food deal with Iraq.

The U.N. has eased sanctions against Iraq and allowed Iraq to sell $2 billion worth of oil every six months in exchange for humanitarian aid for its people suffering from the sanctions imposed after Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

''There is a decoupling of oil sales and the inspections, so we could have a bombing while Iraqi continues to add to oversupply,'' said John Kilduff, trader with Chicago Corp in New York. Meanwhile, the uncertainty governing supply in case of a military strike has speculators on edge.

''To say that funds had a large short position at session's open would have been an understatement, and there are a lot of jittery shorts out there still,'' said Saucer.

Dealers noted much of the short covering was simply pieces of larger short positions accumulated by funds over the four-month oil price decline. A short position is a bet that prices will decline, and recent government data showed funds and other speculators holding one of the largest net short positions in ten years.

Since October, prompt crude has fallen a steep $7.45 a barrel, with the decline gaining momentum in November when OPEC raised its production ceiling by 10 percent.

Concerns of a surplus have mounted since the OPEC hike was met with flagging global demand amid Asia's economic turmoil and a mild winter in the West dampening heating oil demand.

Natural gas futures ended lower across the board Monday in moderately active trade, pressured the entire session by a soft physical market and weather forecasts that offered little hope to the bulls.

February slipped 5.3 cents to close at $2.064 per million British thermal units, just above the $2.055 session low. March settled 5.2 cents lower at $2.073. Other months ended down by 0.9 to four cents.

"There has been some support under the market, but it looked pretty bearish going out. We closed below the short-term uptrend," said one Texas-based trader, noting fairly mild weather continued to weigh on the cash.

Forecasts still call for normal or above-normal U.S. temperatures for the eastern two-thirds of the nation, with above-seasonal levels expected in the West for the period.

With stocks ample and no Arctic cold on the horizon, few expected much upside near-term though decent utility buying interest when prices dip to the low-$2s could limit the downside for a while.

Chart traders viewed as bearish February's close today below previous support at the $2.075 triple bottom, prompting some to expect a test of the $1.97 contract low before the spot month goes off the board Wednesday. Spot continuation chart support was seen in the $1.85-1.88 area. On the upside, resistance was first pegged at $2.185, with better buying likely at $2.25 and $2.34.

In the cash Monday, Gulf Coast swing quotes slipped three cents to the $2.04-2.09 area. Midcon pipes were down a similar amount to the high-$1.90s. New York city gate gas fell more than a nickel to the low-$2.40s, while Chicago was about five cents lower in the $2.10 area.

February natureal gas futures expire Wednesday, January 28.

The NYMEX 12-month Henry Hub strip fell 3.2 cents to $2.238.

OPEC

OPEC ministers complained today about a 28 percent drop in crude oil prices since November, but it was unclear what the organization could do to reverse the slide.

Analysts say OPEC is pumping too much oil in a market where demand has been severely weakened by the Asian financial crisis. The supply problems were created in part by a decision in November by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to increase its production quota.

Four OPEC ministers planned to address the thorny problem in an emergency meeting that was beginning today.

While the $5.25-a-barrel drop in oil prices is a bonanza for consumers, the drop in revenue is devastating for OPEC members and other oil producers.

And while consumers are seeing prices drop at U.S. gas pumps, retail fuel prices have not dropped as sharply as world oil prices. That's because in developed Western nations, taxes make up a big part of retail fuel prices.

The ministers from Iran, Nigeria, and Kuwait have declined since arriving in Vienna to say precisely what is on their agenda. Prices will be the big topic, but analysts don't expect much action.

The three ministers, along with OPEC secretary-general Rilwanu Lukman of Nigeria, make up a committee that monitors OPEC's adherence to its production quotas, or as is often the case, the lack of compliance.

The small group can make recommendations -- perhaps calling for an emergency meeting of all 11 OPEC ministers -- but the committee lacks the power to agree on any production cuts.

Indonesia's oil minister, Ida Bagus Sudjana, who serves as OPEC president, will also attend. Sudjana said today he was disappointed with prices and that ''we'll try to find a solution,'' although he wouldn't offer any hints.

Earlier, OPEC reported that its average crude price had tumbled to $13.56 a barrel on Friday. That compares with $18.81 per barrel in November, when OPEC decided under pressure from Saudi oil minister Ali Naimi to raise it stated output ceiling by 10 percent, to 27.5 million barrels a day.

OPEC prices are almost $10 a barrel lower than last January, when markets had been firm.

Because of widespread cheating by some members, OPEC is believed to be producing some 28 million barrels per day -- while earlier expectations for big growth in world demand for crude oil this year shattered by the economic troubles in Asia.

Futures markets were quiet early today. Brent crude oil to be delivered in March was up 19 cents a barrel, at $14.93, on London's International Petroleum Exchange.

Some analysts say Saudi Arabia, the top OPEC producer that pushed the controversial plans to raise output, might help solve the problem by quietly cutting back its own production.

That could strengthen markets while avoiding any embarrassing reversals of official OPEC policy. Analysts say that when the Saudis were developing their plans to pump more oil, during the early autumn, they vastly underestimated how bad things would get in southeast Asia.

Currencies, markets and confidence have plunged in several nations, and economists say growth in oil demand in the region will be far less than previously expected.

As a result, prices fell faster and further than anyone had guessed, to where they are now resting around four-year lows.

OPEC members are Algeria, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Venezuela.



To: Crocodile who wrote (8687)1/27/1998 4:19:00 AM
From: Kerm Yerman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1998 (3)

TOP STORY

The following are a list of news articles covering the NOVA & TCPL pipeline merger. The stories appear in sequence of listing.

Nova, TCPL Tying The Knot

$14-Billion Deal Is Largest Energy Merger Yet;
Nova's Petrochemical Division To Be Spun Off

Monday, January 26, 1998
Brent Jang Calgary Sun

In the biggest energy deal in Canadian history, Nova Corp. and TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. will announce today that they plan to merge in a $14-billion transaction, industry sources said yesterday.

Under the deal, TransCanada and Nova will combine their natural gas pipeline holdings in a "pooling of interests." Nova'spetrochemicals division will be spun off, said one source close to the negotiations, which were completed late Saturday.

J.E. (Ted) Newall, Nova's vice-chairman and chief executive officer, will reveal the merger plans in a joint announcement with George Watson, TransCanada's president and CEO, the sources said.

Mr. Watson likely will assume the reins of the merged pipeline assets. Mr. Newall is expected to be named chairman of the chemicals entity while Nova president Jeffrey Lipton could become CEO of that new unit.

The merger plan comes after much jockeying to lay pipe to feed the voracious appetite for natural gas in the United States, including a competing proposal launched by Alliance Pipeline Ltd. , whose partners include huge U.S. energy companies that are even bigger than Nova and TransCanada combined.

Nova is the dominant gas pipeline company in Alberta, while TransCanada is the only transporter of natural gas from western to central Canada. Both companies also have numerous international projects.

Nova and TransCanada each have a stock market value of roughly $7-billion.

Some cost savings are expected to come from cutting staff, although layoffs would be minimized as long as the merged company can expand aggressively. Nova has about 6,000 employees in total while TransCanada has more than 2,600workers.

Prices for many petrochemicals, which are used to produce various plastics, have been depressed for more than a year.

Nova's chemicals division, with a payroll of 3,400 workers, also owns 26 per cent of Vancouver-based methanol producer Methanex Corp. and 26 per cent of NGC Corp., a Houston-based natural gas marketer.

The Nova-TransCanada merger will be scrutinized by Canada's Competition Bureau. However, the political expertise of TransCanada senior vice-president Jake Epp, a former federal energy minister, should help overcome potential concerns about too much corporate concentration in the natural gas pipeline business, observers said.

The weekend's development means Nova will cancel its plans, released in November, to split up the conglomerate this spring and create two publicly traded entities: A new pipeline company and new petrochemicals firm.

However, an insider said the spirit of that proposal lives on -- investors will have pure plays that are each narrowly focused on one business specialty.

Institutional investors have complained in recent years that Nova suffered from a split personality: Its pipeline assets look attractive to conservative investors who want stability, but the company's petrochemical holdings appealed to speculative investors who thrive on volatile commodity prices.

"One of the reasons that Nova was looking at splitting itself was simply because investors wanted pure plays," the insider said.

The pipeline and chemicals divisions have roughly the same value now, but analysts say Nova's chemicals unit would be worth much more if commodity prices soared. By contrast, Canada's pipeline sector remains heavily regulated, although the grip of regulators is loosening.

Nova was founded in 1954 as Alberta Gas Trunk Line by the province's Social Credit administration led by then-premier Ernest Manning. Privatized in 1961, it grew from a small pipeline venture into a much larger entity and was renamed Nova in 1980.

TransCanada, a creation of the federal government in 1951, moved its head office to Calgary from Toronto in 1990. It has gone through various changes through the decades, including being controlled at one point in the 1980s by Dome Petroleum.

Nova shares closed at $14.85 on Friday, up $1 on the week, while TransCanada shares closed at $30.35, down $2.45 on the week.

The companies confirmed on Thursday that they had been holding merger talks, following rumours of a possible marriage of the two energy giants.

TransCanada, whose pipeline network connects to Nova's system at the Saskatchewan-Alberta boundary, has had a stranglehold on transporting western Canadian natural gas to central Canada for decades. TransCanada also exports huge volumes of gas to the United States.

But the emergence in late 1995 of a rival plan by Alliance Pipeline caught the two pipeline giants by surprise. Alliance hopes to win approval in mid-1998 from the National Energy Board to build a $3.7-billion pipeline from northeastern British Columbia to Chicago, seeking to open the line by late 1999.

In an interview before the Nova-TransCanada deal was reached, Alliance vice-president J.R. (Jack) Crawford said the established pipeline companies may be able clear a review by the Competition Bureau if the NEB approves Alliance's proposal.

"The irony of the situation is that Nova and TCPL might want us to exist in effect as a precursor to them being able to merge," Mr. Crawford said.

Talks between the two Calgary-based companies went smoothly in part because of good contacts at the board level: TransCanada chairman Gerald Maier is a long-time friend of Nova chairman Richard Haskayne.


Nova No Longer Alberta Inc.

Monday, January 26, 1998
By Mathew Ingram Calgary Sun

The rumours started circulating just before Christmas, and got stronger in early January -- TransCanada PipeLines was said to be putting together a plan to take over Nova Corp. Although some industry watchers scoffed at the idea, last week the two Calgary companies admitted they were discussing a merger that would create a $14-billion company, the largest business deal in oil patch history.

Any astonishment at the size of the proposed deal, of course, was soon extinguished by the announcement of the Royal Bank's proposed takeover of the Bank of Montreal, since the creation of an entity with $450-billion worth of assets makes the value of the TCPL-Nova deal look like a rounding error. But the overall principle behind the two deals is the same: You can't be too big when you're dealing with companies that are five times your size.

Sensible or not, there were a couple of reasons that even some seasoned industry players initially played down the rumours about TCPL and Nova. For one thing, takeover rumours in the oil patch are about as common as pickup trucks, but rarely as reliable. Then there was the sheer size and scale of the two companies, which seemed to argue against a deal.

But even more than that, there was probably a hesitation in believing such a thing was possible simply because of Nova's status in Alberta. This is not -- or at least was not -- just another company with a bunch of pipes and some chemical plants. This was Alberta Inc., a company conceived by premier Ernest Manning's government in 1954 and nurtured through various policies and regulations as a tool of regional and industrial development.

It's hard to believe that such an animal could be reduced to just another resource company, subject to just another takeover offer. And yet that is what has happened. In a fairly short time -- the blink of an eye, relatively speaking -- Nova has become just another company, no longer able to rely on (even as it chafed against) the safety and protection of the government.

The transformation has been a complex one, but one of the factors at the centre of it all has been the Alliance pipeline project. The $3.7-billion producer-backed pipeline to Chicago hasn't been the cause of all the changes, nor was it the only thing that led Nova to announce that it would split in two, which in turn threw the doors open to a takeover. But Alliance has definitely been the catalyst that crystallized Nova's fate.

The first step in Nova's transformation came four years ago, when the act that created Nova was repealed, and the company became governed by the normal corporate rules as everyone else. It was a step Nova itself had asked for, so it could make the changes it felt were necessary to get into other lines of business. Not long afterward, it started to get involved in international projects, a strategy that has begun to pay off.

And yet the old ways died hard, and nothing showed that more than Alliance, the first large-scale threat to Nova's traditional monopoly. A year-and-a-half ago, Nova started battling Alliance tooth and nail, portraying itself as the benevolent saviour of the natural gas industry, and Alliance as a short-sighted dash for cash on the part of some disgruntled producers.

At the same time, the conglomerate was making its case behind the scenes to various members of the Klein government -- in particular, defending the "postage stamp" tradition of pipeline pricing, which helped make high-cost production in the north more economically feasible by charging producers the same rate to ship their gas regardless of how far that gas had to travel. Industry insiders say it was clear Nova thought its pre-eminent position was totally secure, thanks to its long and cozy relationship with the province.

At some point, however, it became obvious that the government was not going to ride to Nova's rescue either on Alliance or the postage stamp. The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board stopped short of upholding the postage stamp in a pipeline ruling, and Energy Minister Pat Black said the industry was effectively on its own when it came to the issues posed by Alliance. For better or worse, the emotional apron strings had been cut.

It's worth noting that TransCanada -- whose virtual monopoly outside Alberta mirrors Nova's inside -- has also been shaken up by the Alliance proposal. After poo-poohing the idea, TCPL got moving too late and wound up coming up with a series of abortive proposals for competing projects. First there was a grand scheme called Nexus, all but scrapped later in favour of something called Viking Voyageur. A related line called TransVoyageur was launched, and later scrapped in favour of a more modest project.

Did Alliance cause all this turmoil, or did it just make the existing turmoil within these two monopolies more obvious? That's difficult to say. What is clear is that, for an idea that was jeeredat as a "pipe dream" when first proposed less than three years ago, Alliance has played a key part in a historic transformation of the Western Canadian natural gas industry, a transformation whose effects will be felt for years to come.

Nova And TCPL Unite As Equals
Claudia Cattaneo Financial Post
Post
After two months of discussions, Nova Corp. and TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. announced yesterday they're uniting as equals to form the fourth largest energy services company in North America, with assets of $21 billion and revenues of $16 billion.

The new company, which has not been named, will then spin off Nova's chemical unit into a freestanding, publicly traded company with assets of $3.9 billion, revenues of $3.4 billion - and big expansion plans.

"This is a deal made in heaven," said Nova vice-chairman Ted Newall. "These are two businesses that fit perfectly - 90% of their gas comes from us.

"They don't have any pipe in Alberta. We don't have any pipe outside. And we both want to grow in energy services."

Newall will be chairman of the new chemical company, while the chief executive will be Nova president Jeff Lipton.

"The North American energy services industry is experiencing a wave of consolidation as companies position themselves for success in an increasingly competitive market," said TCPL president and chief executive George Watson, who will be president and chief executive of the entity.

Under the agreement, Nova shareholders will get 0.52 of a TCPL share for each Nova share held. This values Nova stock at $15.75, slightly less than analysts expected. Each Nova preferred share will be exchanged for a preferred share in the merged company.

Nova shares (NVA/TSE) closed at $15.05, up 20›. TCPL shares (TRP/TSE) ended the day at $30.30, down 5›.

Shareholders of both firms will also get a piece of the chemical company, expected to start trading after the merger is cleared by shareholders, regulators and tax authorities.

Shares of the chemical company are expected to hit the market at about $7 a share - a combination of the current value of Nova's chemical assets ($4 to $5 a share), Nova's share in Methanex Corp. (valued at about $1 a share) and its stake in NGC Corp. (valued at about $2 a share), said Tom Kehoe, a principal with Peters & Co. Ltd.

"Nova's shareholders are getting a fair deal," he said. "I always thought the breakup value was $14.75. They are getting $15.75."

The new entity is expected to yield $100 million in pretax incremental earnings by 2002 through revenue growth and cost reductions of more than $150 million.

The initial annual dividend is expected to be $1.12 a common share, down from $1.24. TCPL plans to issue up to $250 million in new shares this year to help pay for the transaction.

Through a plan of arrangement that would have to receive court approval, the merger is expected to be finalized in the next four to six months. The Alberta Energy & Utilities Board and the federal Competition Bureau must approve the deal.

Watson said he approached Newall with the proposal almost right after Nova announced plans in November to split its two businesses - chemicals and pipelines - into two separate publicly traded companies.

"After the spinout, we believed somebody would take a run at it and so we acted proactively," Watson said. "We were concerned if they were bought by someone else we would lose control over our ability to control costs."

The job of selling the marriage started immediately. A meeting with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers was held yesterday afternoon. Watson said producers' first reaction was: "This is about the big and ugly getting bigger and uglier."

Producers will be looking for savings and assurances there is competition in access to markets, said CAPP president David Manning. They are also concerned about Nova's position against the proposed Alliance project, a $3.7-billion natural gas pipeline competing with the Nova/TCPL systems. The proposal is before the National Energy Board for approval.

Newall said producers have nothing to fear because competition is not diminished. In fact, lower costs will translate into lower transmission costs for producers and savings for consumers, he said. The combined companies are also promising to be more efficient and more responsive to producer needs.

Shares in Nova's chemical business, which will be one of the few pure plays in North America, will start trading during a downturn in commodity prices.

But the new unit expects to benefit from major savings next year and completion of new plants in Sarnia, Ont., and Joffre, Alta., said Lipton.

Lipton said he's already started discussions to take over operations of companies that want to spin off their commodity chemicals.

"The vision is to grow and to consolidate around our current nucleus, to be very low cost and attract others to work with us," he said.

Hundreds of people worked on the deal to ensure the union would yield enough savings and revenue enhancements to make it worthwhile, Watson said.

"There were so many people involved, that's why it was the worst kept secret in town."


Who Wins In Nova-TCPL Deal?

Tuesday, January 27, 1998
By Mathew Ingram

At a press conference yesterday announcing his company's $14-billion merger with TransCanada PipeLines, Nova CEO Ted Newall said several times how the deal was a "win-win" arrangement for all concerned, "a win for Canada," good for Western gas producers, and so on.

Even assuming all that is true, however, it's hard to see how it's all that great for the group Mr. Newall is supposed to be concerned about -- Nova's shareholders.

As the deal is structured, TransCanada and Nova will merge into a combined entity on what's known as a "pooling of interests" basis. This is being done to avoid various negative accounting implications that would arise if TCPL took over Nova. Apart from the finagling over share swap details that is required by this method, there is one main outcome: Nova shareholders do not get any premium for their stock.

This isn't just a coincidental byproduct of the pooling of interests method but a central requirement. If TransCanada were to pay Nova a takeover premium -- in other words, pay more for its assets than their market value -- then TCPL would have to take all kinds of writeoffs for that difference in asset value, known as "good will." TransCanada couldn't really afford to do that, so the deal is being structured so that there is no premium.

In effect, this deprives Nova shareholders of the kind of share price appreciation they might otherwise expect. When the gas pipeline and chemical conglomerate announced in November that it was planning to split in two, there was a considerable amount of speculation about the future of the two new companies. Most observers thought there was a good chance that there would be takeover offers for both of them.

TransCanada CEO George Watson obviously thought so. He said yesterday that he called Mr. Newall at about 8 a.m. on the morning the company announced its intention to split to talk about a deal. Mr. Newall, for his part, said Nova executives were fairly sure that takeover discussions would result from the decision to split, but said TCPL was not first on the list. There were a couple of other companies Nova had in mind first when it came to having those kinds of discussions, he said, although he wouldn't name them.

If there had been an auction of some kind for Nova's pipeline system, investors might have received a substantial premium to their existing value. In a recent report, Scotia Capital analyst Sam Kanes said he felt Nova was worth about $18.30 a share with takeover premiums for both pipelines and chemicals built in. The proposed merger with TCPL deprives Nova shareholders of a substantial part of that potential.

And what upside there is will be a considerable way down the road. Mr. Watson said that as a "major stockholder" himself, he obviously thinks the deal is worth it in the long run, although he admitted it will have no impact on earnings for at least the first year.

But he said it likely will have a positive effect the year after that and should result in $100-million worth of pretax earnings by 2002. Both of these, however, are assumptions that shareholders will have to take on faith.

In the short term, the deal already has fallen in value. TCPL is offering 52 per cent of a TCPL share for every share of Nova -- a ratio that last week would have meant $17.16 a Nova share, since TransCanada's stock was trading at $33. As of yesterday, however, the deal would amount to $15.75 a Nova share, since TCPL's stock had fallen to $30.30. Part of the reason for the drop is that it will be issuing 240 million new shares under the deal, diluting the value of its existing 221 million shares.

There is some potential upside for Nova investors. Under the current plan, the chemical unit will be spun off as a separate company, the shares of which will be distributed to Nova and TCPL shareholders. Assuming it attracts takeover offers, something analysts feel is fairly likely, there is the potential for some kind of takeover premium there -- although not a large one since chemical prices are weak and expected to continue to weaken.

One other interesting aspect of the announcement yesterday was the difference between the way Mr. Watson and Mr. Newall spoke about the Alliance pipeline project, currently before the National Energy Board. Mr. Watson said the $3.7-billion pipeline to Chicago was "pretty well inevitable" and he felt TCPL should be prepared for competition.

Mr. Newall, however, said the merger had no effect whatsoever on his company's position on Alliance, which is that it would be bad for the Western Canadian basin.

If you're a betting sort of person, the odds here favour Mr. Watson. The combination of two large quasi-monopolies, such as Nova and TCPL, will make Alliance even more likely to be approved than it already was. Flashing a hint of his steely nature, Mr. Watson said that, while his opinion and Nova's differ on Alliance, "at the end of the day, there there will be one position."

Mr. Watson, incidentally, will be CEO of the merged pipeline company.




To: Crocodile who wrote (8687)1/28/1998 6:14:00 AM
From: Crocodile  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 1998 (1)

Wednesday, January 28, 1998

Bay Street stocks soared, aided by a strong performance by resource-based issues. Wall Street posted its biggest gain in a week on stronger than expected earnings reports

The Toronto Stock Exchange 300 composite index rose 138.58 points, or 2.1%, to 6721.72. ÿAlmost all 14 subindexes advanced, particularly the resource-based stocks, which hold a combined weight of 25% of the TSE 300. ÿ

The gold and precious minerals group rallied after slipping to historic lows in recent weeks. The group rose 2.7% as it gained confidence from a strengthening price of bullion. ÿBullion for February delivery rose US$3.70 to US$300.50 an ounce on the New York Mercantile Exchange's Comex division. ÿTraders said that with gold flirting around the US$300 range, the precious mineral had "bottomed out," said John Ing, president at Maison Placements Canada Inc. Ing also noted that gold was a good hedge against a weakening US$. ÿBarrick Gold Corp. (ABX/TSE) rose 95› to $29.10 and Teck Corp. (TEKb/TSE) rose 75› to $22.25. ÿThe metals and minerals subindex also showed strength, rising 3.1%, the oil and gas sector climbed 2.7% and paper and forest products subgroup jumped 2.8%. ÿ

The heavily weighted financial services sector, which makes up 2.1 % of the benchmark, rose almost 1%. ÿ

Northern Telecom Ltd. shares surged after the company said its fourth-quarter profit jumped 22% to US$390 million (US74› a share) from US$319 million (US61›) for the same period a year earlier. ÿNortel (NTL/TSE), which accounts for 2.7% of the TSE 300 index, rose $6.10 to $63.75. BCE Inc. (BCE/TSE), which holds a 51.7% stake in Nortel, rose $1.35 to $47.85. ÿ

Nova Corp. (NVA/TSE) gained 45› to $15.50 on volume of 11 million shares, making it the most active issue on the TSE. ÿTransCanada PipeLines Ltd. (TRP/TSE), up 55› to $30.85, said on Monday it will purchase Nova for $7.12 billion. ÿAbout 131.1 million shares changed hands on the TSE, compared with 137.3 million on Monday. ÿ

Other Canadian markets ended higher.

The Montreal Exchange portfolio rose 94.5 points, or 2.8%, to 3489.28.

The Vancouver Stock Exchange climbed 5.11 points, or 0.9%, to 596.13.

For a scorecard of trading activity on all Canadian Stock Exchanges, go to:
quote.yahoo.com .

ÿ
The Dow Jones industrial average rose 102.14 points, or 1.3%, to 7815.08. ÿ

The Standard & Poor's 500 index gained 12.07 points, or 1.3%, to 969.02 and the Nasdaq composite index climbed 17.44 points, or 1.1%, to 1578.9. ÿ

Advancers topped decliners on the New York Stock Exchange where about 684.7 million shares changed hands, up from 559.7 million shares traded Tuesday. ÿ

Walt Disney Co., Ford Motor Co. and Merck & Co. all beat earnings forecasts and spurred optimism that a predicted slowdown in profit growth may not happen. ÿDisney shares (DIS/NYSE) rose US$5 9/16 to US$102 15/16. Ford (F/NYSE) climbed US$1 3/4 to US$50 and Merck (MRK/NYSE) rose 1/2 to US$114 7/16. ÿ

Arthur Micheletti, chief strategist at Bailard, Biehl & Kaiser in Foster City, Calif., said earnings expectations have swung wildly in the past month as investors tried to assess the impact on earnings from the Asian economic crisis. ÿ"Analysts have revised estimates so much that you don't know whether an earnings report that topped forecasts was short of the expectations in place at the beginning of the quarter," Micheletti said. ÿ

Oil shares rallied as a conflict between Iraq and the United Nations intensified. A military strike by the U.S. in the Persian Gulf could limit oil supply and drive oil prices higher. ÿRoyal Dutch Petroleum Co. (RD/NYSE) rose US$1 5/16 to US$52 1/8, Chevron Corp. (CHV/NYSE) gained US$1 1/16 to US$76 5/8, Mobil Corp. (MOB/NYSE) climbed 5/8 to US$68 1/4 and Texaco Inc. (TX/NYSE) jumped 3/4 to US$53. ÿ

Major international stock markets ended mixed. ÿ

London: British stocks soared to a near record closing high amid a bullish combination of bid speculation, prospects for no further rise in British interest rates and an early advance on Wall Street. The FT-SE 100 index closed at 5326.3, up 89.1 points or 1.7%. ÿ

Frankfurt: German stocks put in a late surge to end the day up more than 1%. The Dax index closed at 4278.76, up 53.98 points or 1.3%. ÿ

Tokyo: Japanese stocks ended slightly weaker. The 225-share Nikkei average closed at 16,981.62, down 91.71 points or 0.5%. ÿ

Hong Kong: Stocks ended with a rally, closing sharply higher as two red chips joined the Hang Seng index. The Hang Seng index closed at 9252.36, up 278.5 points or 3.1%. ÿ

Sydney: The Australian share market ended lower in quiet trade as weaker bonds weighed on banks. The all ordinaries index closed at 2603.9, down 19.4 points or 0.7%.

*******************************************************************************

Good time to review portfolios -- By PATRICK BLOOMFIELD

I left the annual outlook presentation to holders of GBC Asset management funds yesterday with four implicit messages.

* If you think the Asian crisis has already been contained, think again. As Bank Credit Analyst editor in chief Anthony Boeckh put it: "The point is that you simply cannot quantify the risks out there."

* The resulting slowdown in U.S., Canadian (and global) economic growth, exacerbated by the likelihood of a leadership vacuum in Washington, can only be bullish for North American bondholders.

* This is, therefore, an appropriate time for mutual fund investors to take a hard and cool look at the balance of stocks, bonds and cash in their portfolios.

* And, while the people on the platform never said it in so many words, any investor with a low propensity for risk -- or likely to need cash in the next year or two -- should think hard about keeping more than usual in bonds and less than usual in stocks.
ÿ
I can convey these thoughts best by saying who the GBC people are, and snipping some facts and figures from Boeckh's address -- it being his task to give the bad economic news on which bond markets thrive.
ÿ
The GBC group is one of the exceptions in the mutual fund business in that it remains small by choice, and, in a figurative sense, privately held. New investors are required to start with a minimum of $100,000 a family. Its managers also happen to be well regarded by fellow pros.
ÿ
One of Boeckh's initial points was the magnitude and speed of Asia's downfall. He put up a chart of the decline of Asian stock markets relative to the decline and fall of the Dow Jones industrial average between the market peak in 1929 and the trough in 1932. In dollar terms, the Asian markets have now fallen 75%. By contrast the decline in the Dow in the early years of the Great Depression was 80%.
ÿ
But the Dow took almost four years to effect its fall. The Asian stock markets have managed almost as much in some six to eight months.
ÿ
As for the extent of the damage, Boeckh noted estimates suggesting that the wealthiest 500 families in Asia have shed as much as 90% of their riches in the past six months.
ÿ
That is something in itself. Then there is the Asian debt burden, a more crucial issue. Boeckh explained that Asian corporations had been drastically overborrowed in foreign currencies (mainly the US$) on the assumption that their own currencies were either stable relative to the US$ or pegged to that currency. Many of these overweening borrowers were big, unwieldy conglomerates using high debt leverage.
ÿ
Boeckh cited estimates suggesting the average South Korean conglomerate was operating at about a four-to-one debt ratio before the mayhem spread. (In Canada we are taught that a one-to-one debt ratio is a reasonable limit of investment respectability.) With the decline in their currencies, those Korean conglomerates are now looking at average ratios nearer eight-to-one.
ÿ
And, since those conglomerates on the other side of the Pacific typically rely on higher volumes for their profits, and run razor-thin profit margins, their profitability has been trashed.
ÿ
Boeckh suggested that Chinese gross domestic product growth will likely fall to 4%-5% from the recent 8%-9%, and that growth of countries that had been growing in the 4%-6% range will decline to zero -- or maybe worse.
ÿ
This might be less disturbing if the Asian economies were little ponds in the world economic pool. But they are not. Going by Boeckh's numbers, Asia, excluding Japan, represents about 25% of the global economy and has contributed 50% of world growth over the past several years, not to mention 35% of world trade.
ÿ
The problem that Boeckh sees coming next is the sheer overcapacity of those parts. Because of the nature of their high-volume, low-margin operations, and the dire social consequences of downsizing, those corporations are not going to cut back. Instead, he suggested, they are going to export their excess supply and their price deflation to the west.
ÿ
Space precludes me from dwelling on Japan Inc.'s exacerbation of Asian problems. Rather, let us turn to the effect on the rest of the world, which Boeckh believes to be "very, very deflationary," the only point at issue being the downside for prices in the world economy at large.
ÿ
Boeckh's "base case" of the most likely outcome is that GDP growth in the U.S, and Canada will be cut to about 2% from 4% and price inflation will become a thing of the past.

And that is only his base case, though his most likely outcome. If the crisis in the White House is as bad as it looks, then the risks become unquantifiable.
ÿ
All of which suggests that the months, and maybe years, ahead, might well be a good time to be a consumer with cash in the bank, and a very good time to be bondholder.
ÿ
If you are looking for a repeat of the stock market growth of recent years, forget it. I will have more on the GBC view of that side of the investment spectrum in a coming column.

*******************************************************************************

BC TELECOM INC. (BCT/TSE), down 10› to $43.40, on volume of 55,459 shares.ÿThe telecommunication utility's shares dipped after CS First Boston downgraded its rating to "sell" from "hold". BC Telecom declared a dividend of 34› yesterday.

BARRICK GOLD CORP. (ABX/TSE), up 95› to $29.10, on volume of 1.3 million shares. Placer Dome Inc. (PDG/TSE), up 35› to $20.30, on volume of 1.2 million shares.ÿBarrick's rating was lowered to "neutral" from "outperform" by Morgan Stanley's Douglas Cohen, who said the company is a premium quality producer at an ultra-premium price. ÿPlacer gained strength after saying on Monday it will take a US$247-million writedown in the fourth quarter. The writedown comes as no surprise to analysts as bullion prices have been at 18 1/2-year lows.

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA (RY/TSE), up 30› to $78.30, on volume of 1.8 million shares. Bank of Montreal (BMO/TSE), down 25› to $69.95, on volume of three million shares. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM/TSE), up $1.05 to $41.80, on volume of 3.2 million shares. Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS/TSE), up $1.35 to $67, on volume of 2.2 million shares. Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD/TSE), up 15› to $57.40, on volume of 1.3 million shares. ÿThe TSE financial services subindex continued to rally, gaining another 1%. The group is up 8% since Thursday, the day before the Bank of Montreal and Royal announced their intent to merge. ÿIn related news, CIBC and TD have agreed to sell their payroll business to U.S-based Ceridian Corp. Ceridian is eager to enter the Canadian market and face its largest competitor, New Jersey-based Automatic Data Processing.

EXTENDICARE INC. (EXEa/TSE), down $1.35 to $16.50, on volume of 175,672 shares. ÿThe Markham, Ont.-based nursing home operator said it will record a pre-tax charge of $23.5 million in the fourth quarter of 1997. The charge is a result of the refinancing of Extendicare and Arbor Health Care Co. due to the recent acquisition of Arbor. ÿThe company also said 1998 earnings could drop by about 15› a share because of decreased service fees in the U.S, higher startup costs for new facilities and higher than expected financing costs.

MICROSOFT CORP. (MSFT/NASDAQ), up US$3 7/16 to US$145 3/16, on volume of 12.2 million shares. ÿChairman Bill Gates said the company is on track to release a new test version of Windows NT 5.0 software for networks in the first half of 1998. The NT version is one of the company's biggest revenue generators. ÿAlso expected to be released on time is Windows 98 and a new version of Microsoft Office business software.

*******************************************************************************

Insider Trading -- By DAN WESTELL -- The Financial Post

Noranda Inc. bought 2.2 million shares of Falconbridge Ltd. for $17.50 or $17.75 each in December to hold almost 84.1 million shares, the Ontario Securities Commission insider trading report shows.
ÿ
Other transactions, after October unless noted, include:

* Co-Steel Inc. -- Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, which holds more than 10%, bought one million shares and sold 19,400 for $18.05 to $21 each to hold 3.8 million

* Dylex Ltd. -- Jeffrey Sarfin, officer, exercised 83,000 options for $1.11 each and sold 83,000 shares for $6 to $6.35 each to hold 10,000 shares.

* First Marathon Inc. -- Robert Disbrow, director, sold 43,300 class A shares for $20.78 to $23.75 each to hold more than 239,000.

* Imax Corp. -- Richard Gelfond, vice-chairman, and Bradley Weschler, chairman, each sold 100,000 shares for US$24.95 apiece to each hold more than 750,000.

* Inco Ltd. -- Edward Mercaldo, director, sold 100,000 shares for $25.04 each to hold 408,036.

* Monarch Development Corp. -- Standard Life Assurance Co., which holds more than 10%, sold 500,000 shares for $11 each to hold more than nine million indirectly.

* Mortice Kern Systems Inc. -- Ruth Songhurst, officer, director and holder of more than 10%, disposed of 1.1 million shares for $7.50 each to hold 156,000 indirectly.

* National Bank of Canada -- Emanuele Saputo, director, sold almost 115,000 shares for $23.80 or $25 each to hold 200,000 indirectly.

* Power Corp of Canada -- Paul Desmarais Jr., officer and director, sold 60,000 subordinate shares for $48 to $48.64 each to hold 2,096 indirectly. Michel Plessis-Belair, officer and director, exercised 50,000 options for $18.31 or $20.88 each and sold 50,000 subordinate shares for $47.51 each to hold 7,900 shares.

* Timberwest Timber Trust -- Southeastern Asset Management Inc., which holds more than 10%, bought more than 7.1 million trust units for US$6.33 or US$9.60 each to hold 13.8 million indirectly.

********************************************************************************

ÿ



To: Crocodile who wrote (8687)1/28/1998 6:16:00 AM
From: Crocodile  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15196
 
MARKET ACTIVITY/TRADING NOTES FOR DAY ENDING TUESDAY, JANUARY 27, 1998 (2)

The Dealmakers: -- Rating the Underwriters...

Tops in a tight race -- By DAN WESTELL - The Financial Post

CIBC Wood Gundy beats close competition for second year in a row

In 1996, investment dealers brought a record number of underwriting deals to market in Canada. But results for 1996 pale in comparison with last year.

According to The Financial Post's annual overview of corporate and government financings, in 1997 the top 10 underwriters raised more than $66 billion for clients, up about 50% from the 1996 amount. ÿAmong the top 10, the gain includes a 6% drop in government bond sales, to about $15 billion; a 60% increase in corporate debt underwritings, to $21 billion; and a near doubling of equity placements, to more than $30 billion.

Based on the bonus-credit-to-lead-manager formula, CIBC Wood Gundy Securities Inc. was the top underwriter for the second year in a row, according to the Post's ranking methods. ÿIn the rankings, Gundy not only held on to the top spot, but also improved relative to its three closest competitors: RBC Dominion Securities Inc., Nesbitt Burns Inc. and ScotiaMcLeod Inc. (See page 23 for an explanation of the methods used to rank dealers.) ÿThe figures were compiled by Financial Post DataGroup, and evaluate where firms stood in relation to each other across a number of widely accepted categories. ÿ

The rise in overall equity sales was helped by several factors. A record number of companies made initial public offerings, and large firms initiated massive spinoffs as they attempted to hone their business focus. A revival in the real estate market also played a role. ÿDeclining interest rates encouraged companies to borrow more, while the public sector's efforts to control its debt produced a drop in government financings. ÿ

Matching clients that need capital with buyers who want to invest is a key part of the securities business, providing investment dealers with about 21% of their revenue in a normal year. ÿBut 1997 was not normal. In the nine months ended Sept. 30, underwriting deals accounted for 26% of dealers' revenue, and in the third quarter, it hit 28%, according to statistics prepared by the Investment Dealers' Association. ÿBy the end of the third quarter, underwriting revenue for the whole industry was up 44%, to $1.6 billion from $1.1 billion in the 1996 period. ÿThe rising tide in the investment business lifted all the players, but among the four leaders only Gundy maintained its percentage share of the top 10 underwriting deals. ÿ

Its deals accounted for 16.7%, or almost one-sixth of the total number of financings completed. The firms in the next three positions maintained their rankings from 1996, but all lost between 0.7 and 1.4 percentage points' worth of deals to competitors farther down the list. ÿ"It's nice to be No. 1," says John Hunkin, who as president of CIBC World Markets is Gundy's top investment banker. However, he adds, "there is a real horse race." ÿTo hold the top position, "you have to be in the top three in everything," said Wayne Fox, head of global capital markets.

FP DataGroup numbers place Gundy first in both corporate debt and equity underwriting, and third in government debt. ÿThe rankings do not necessarily correlate with dealers' revenue or profit. Nonetheless, according to the 1997 annual report from Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, CIBC World Markets reported a 31% profit increase for the fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 1997, to $691 million, on a 30.4% revenue gain at $3.1 billion. ÿ

As another measure of Gundy's success, Hunkin became a $10-million man last year. On top of his base pay of $300,000, he was awarded a $4-million bonus and $6 million worth of CIBC shares, to be paid out over three years as part of a long-term incentive plan. ÿGundy, which came in with a total of almost $11 billion in underwritings - up about 56% from its 1996 total - opened its lead over No. 2 DS to $762 million by widening the gap in corporate debt sales. The two firms were almost equal in 1996, at close to $7 billion in total underwritings. ÿ

In government debt sales, Gundy stood still while DS gained $270 million, and in the equity area, both firms sold $2.5 billion more worth of stock than in 1996. ÿBut in one key area, DS moved ahead. It was the lead manager in 88 issues last year (up from 72 in 1996), compared with 78 at Gundy (up from 73 in 1996). ÿLead manager is a coveted position because the lead has the closest relationship with the client and runs the sale, although it must also work harder and incur more costs to get the issue to market. ÿ

While the almost $800-million gap between the top two firms for all financings is not negligible, it would only take a couple of large deals for DS and Gundy to reverse positions. ÿFor No. 3 Nesbitt Burns or No. 4 ScotiaMcLeod to make a run at the top position, they would have to increase deals by $1.9 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. ÿBut ranking changes are possible, as shown in the case of TD Securities Inc. Last year it vaulted to fifth place from eighth the year before, by increasing its corporate equity underwritings more than threefold, to $3 billion from $875 million. ÿ

"We have worked tremendously hard at increasing our equity and debt distribution, our research and trading," said TD chairman and chief executive Kym Anthony. ÿAmong the top 10, there is only one new name. Salomon Smith Barney took the tenth spot from First Marathon Securities Ltd., mostly on the strength of underwriting $2 billion in corporate debt. ÿSalomon Smith Barney's move was just one example of the gains made in the corporate debt market by U.S.-based dealers. ÿFour of them - Goldman Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch & Co., Salomon Smith Barney and Morgan Stanley, Dean Witter Discover & Co. - last year accounted for more than one third of the total $27.5 billion in corporate debt financings. This was up from just more than one third of $13.1 billion in 1996. These firms respectively held the second, third, fifth and ninth positions as corporate debt underwriters in 1997, compared with third, fifth, ninth and unranked in 1996. ÿ

Until last year, there was no domestic high yield market, which meant Canadian companies had to go to New York. CIBC Wood Gundy now ranks among the top 10 in the U.S. high-yield market, the only non-U.S. company to do so, its executives say. ÿThrough that connection, U.S. dealers gained a toehold with Canadian companies which last year resulted in $9.8 billion of corporate debt underwriting.

**********************************************************************************

DS dominates full credit -- By GREG CRONE-- The Financial Post ÿ

After closing a record number of financing deals worth more than $16 billion, RBC Dominion Securities Inc. has for a second year been rated the No. 1 underwriter in Canada, when full credit is accorded to the lead underwriter of a team. ÿ"It was a banner year," says Gord Nixon, vice-president and director of global investment banking. ÿ

According to data compiled by FP DataGroup, DS reported 88 financing deals at the end of 1997, well ahead of its next two competitors. Second-place CIBC Wood Gundy Inc. completed 78 deals worth $13 billion, and Nesbitt Burns Inc. placed third, with 58 deals worth $11 billion. Strong markets were very accommodating to financing new issues, Nixon says, and new issue volumes were extremely high. ÿ

RBC Dominion was the lead on a $1-billion deal leading to Canadian Pacific Ltd.'s sale of its control block of Laidlaw Inc. shares. DS was also the stickhandler as CP put 11 hotels into a new real estate investment trust (REIT), the Legacy Hotels REIT, valued at $393-million worth of trust units.

In 1996, DS recorded 72 corporate and government deals, worth a total of $11.2 billion. ÿThe 78 corporate financings completed by DS in 1997 were worth $12.6 billion, almost double the $6.9-billion value of deals completed the previous year. ÿ

Nixon said 1997 was the second year in which the income trust and the royalty trust dominated the equity markets. ÿIncome trusts, royalty trusts and REITs became very popular as financing vehicles in 1996, and continued to be active in 1997. ÿ"That led to very significant new issue volumes for the industry and our firm in particular," Nixon says. ÿ"From our firm's perspective, there was a very high degree of new issue financing activity in the areas of real estate and oil and gas." ÿ

The high volume of activity was in part due to last year's economic upswing and to improvements in the markets. "When you cut right through it all, it's a lot easier to finance in a strong market, and it's a lot easier to get issuers to finance when their share prices or the value of their companies are at attractive levels." ÿ

Nixon says RBC Dominion's merger with Richardson Greenshields of Canada Ltd. came at the right time, raising the combined organization's strength to 170 staff in the investment banking division. ÿNixon says the high point for DS last year was the sale by Alberta-based holding company Loram Corp. of its three primary businesses. ÿ

The combined deal raised more than $2 billion, and included two sales on the market. RBC Dominion led the sale of 87 million trust units in Manalta Coal Income Trust, at $10 a share, as well as the issue of 62.4 million trust units by Pembina Pipeline Income Fund, worth $624 million. The rest of the $2 billion was from the sale of Loram's oil and gas assets. ÿ"It was arguably one of the largest single transactions in investment banking history," Nixon says. "Although it was done in three separate deals, it was a transaction to sell all of their assets. It was very much a highlight of last year." ÿ

Aside from its merger with Rich Green, another factor crucial to RBC Dominion's success in 1997 was coordinating more effectively with its corporate bank, Nixon says. "The strong co-operation of a powerful corporate [partner] was something that was very beneficial to us in achieving our success." ÿThis year is already proving to be a very different environment, with a significant decline in new issues, Nixon says. "A lot of that is [because] markets have been very volatile and quite weak.... There is an inability to finance for new companies, even if they wanted to. The valuations of their share prices are such that the markets are just unattractive." ÿThat means 1998 will be a much slower year, Nixon says. He says that in 1997 valuations moved to a level where public markets were generally produced better value than private sales. ÿThere will tend to be a higher relative level of merger and acquisition activity in 1998 than there was in 1997, he says, adding that "financing in this environment is going to remain quite difficult." ÿ

In the category of full credit corporate debt financing, DS ranked second in terms of the value of its deals, but first in the number of deals. ÿGoldman Sachs & Co. led the value field, with 20 deals worth $4.9 billion, while Merrill Lynch & Co. took third place, with 14 deals worth $3.8 billion. ÿIn the category of full credit corporate equity financing, DS was No. 1 again, completing 52 deals worth $8.4 billion. ÿGundy ranked second in full credit corporate equity, completing 54 deals worth a total of about $8.12 billion. ÿDS led in the category of full credit initial public offering (IPO) financing, with 18 deals worth a total of $3.6 billion. ÿRBC Dominion also led in the full-credit category of government debt financing. L‚vesque Beaubien Geoffrion Inc. completed 11 deals, worth almost $3.3 billion and good for second place. ÿAmong foreign firms, U.S.-based Merrill Lynch & Co. emerged as the full credit leader, completing 15 debt and equity financings worth $4.3 billion. ÿFor a full ranking of top underwriters using the full-credit method, see page 28. ÿ

************************************************************************************ÿ

GTAA debt deal soars -- By JOHN GREENWOOD -- The Financial Post

Nesbitt Burns pilots Canada's largest bond issue to date

On Dec. 2 last year, the Greater Toronto Airports Authority made history when it completed Canada's biggest corporate bond issue to date. With Nesbitt Burns Inc. acting as lead underwriter, the GTAA raised a total of $950 million, edging out former record-holder NAV Canada, a non-share capital corporation which closed a $750-million bond issue in March 1997. ÿ

The issue by the GTAA was broken down into three tranches: $200 million in five-year bonds at 5.4%; $375 million in 10-year bonds at 5.95%; and another $375 million in 30-year bonds at 6.45%. ÿ

The deal was unique not just because of its size, but also because it was one of the rare instances in Canada in which a corporation has issued revenue bonds. Although common in the U.S., revenue bonds are rare in Canada. NAV Canada's 1996 deal was to finance its acquisition of the country's civil air navigation system Nesbitt was consulted in determining NAV's structure. ÿ

Running the show for Nesbitt on the GTAA deal were Rick Byers, vice-president and director of investment banking, and Colleen Campbell, managing director of debt capital markets. The underwriting team spent nearly six months ironing out the wrinkles of the deal. ÿThat in itself meant more risk for both underwriter and issuer. "You do all that work well in advance of knowing what the market conditions are going to be [when the issue goes to market]," Campbell says. "You never know what the pricing is going to be and you don't know how it's going to be received. As it turned out, we entered into very difficult market conditions." ÿ

Proceeds will be used to repay debt related to the GTAA's acquisition of Terminal Three at Toronto's Pearson International Airport. The deal's Dec. 2, 1997 closing date fell on the one-year anniversary of when the GTAA took over operation of the airport. ÿThe GTAA was set up by the federal government as part of its plan to cut down on spending by transferring the operation and maintenance of the country's 26 largest airports to local airport management authorities. ÿThey are run on a not-for-profit basis by government-appointed managers, but they are structured in the same way as a corporation structure and their debt is not guaranteed by the government. ÿ

Unencumbered by government bureaucracy, the authorities are theoretically able to achieve a level of efficiency comparable to that of the corporate system. This way, airport users benefit from the best aspects of both the public and private sector. ÿ

Incorporated in March 1993, the GTAA is a corporation without share capital under Part II of the Canada Corporations Act. The GTAA opted to issue revenue bonds to raise the money required to buy Terminal 3, because it has no share capital and leases its assets from the government. ÿThe bonds are secured by the revenue stream the assets generate, rather than by the assets themselves. ÿ"This was a Canadian solution that, from a bond point of view, works very well. It's very financeable," Campbell says. "Once investors understood the not-for-profit aspect, they found [the issue] appealing." ÿBecause the GTAA's debt is not guaranteed by the government, one of the big questions investors were asking was how the GTAA would be held accountable, if it was a not-for-profit entity. ÿOnce investors understood that revenue would stay within the airport, Byers said, accountability ceased to be an issue. ÿBy the December close, 87% of the bonds had been sold in Canada, the rest in the U.S. Moody's Investors Service, Inc. has rated the issue A2. Canadian Bond Rating Service Ltd. gave it an A+ (Low) and Dominion Bond Rating Service Ltd. gave it an A (high). ÿ

Shortly after it took over Pearson in 1996, the GTAA management team set the wheels in motion to buy Terminal Three. After unofficially approaching potential underwriters both in Canada and the U.S. the authority launched a formal tender for offers in February 1997. ÿBy March, the team from Nesbitt had been chosen to lead the deal and also as financial advisors. Salomon Smith Barney International Inc. (formerly Smith Barney Canada Inc.) was selected as co-adviser and a member of the underwriting syndicate. ÿByers says Salomon Smith Barney's contribution to the team was key, because it is one of the most successful underwriters for airport authorities in the U.S. Airports in the U.S. are run on a not-for-profit basis by local municipalities, which act as guarantors for their debt. ÿ

Another aspect of this deal that was borrowed from the U.S. model was the role of the airport feasibility consultant. In the U.S., the opinion of the consultant carries a lot of weight both with airport management and with the investment community. Their report is relied on very heavily by the rating agencies. In this instance the consultant's report was incorporated into the prospectus. ÿSince the value of the GTAA's bonds will depend on the airport's ability to generate a long-term stream of revenue, investors were obviously concerned with factors such as the health of the airline industry overall, Toronto's economic future and the airport's ability to continue to meet the demands of travelers. ÿ

The roadshow to promote the bond issue kicked off on Nov. 12 in Montreal. From there, the team zigzagged west, stopping along the way in Boston, New York, Toronto and Winnipeg before wrapping up in Vancouver. ÿThe process was as much about education as it was about selling. "In Canada, investors were more aware of the Canadian business structure, and the banking and credit environment, but they were less familiar with airport financings," Byers says. "In the U.S., it was the other way around. Investors were familiar with airport financings but didn't know the Canadian model." ÿDespite running into what Campbell describes as a "huge headwind" from the Asian fallout, the issue quickly turned into a hit, and was oversubscribed by nearly $300 million. Moreover, with more than 70 investors in the book, buyers were broadly distributed across the whole spectrum of institutions. ÿ

The deal's success is more than just a feather in Nesbitt's cap. Over the next few years, Byers expects Canadian governments to begin privatizing not just airports but other large holdings as well. As that movement takes hold, the authorities being created to manage these ventures will need financing. ÿByers figures the time and effort his team has put into structuring the GTAA deal will land Nesbitt at the head of the line of potential underwriters for these upcoming deals. ÿ

********************************************************************************

Where to invest -- By WILLIAM HANLEY -- The Financial Post
ÿ
Is the Street having trouble making up its mind which way the stock market will go in 1998? Well, yes and no.
ÿ
After three years of a remarkable upleg in the secular bull market that is widely judged to have begun in 1982, North American market watchers are torn between wondering how long this splendid party can last and wondering if they will be punished for being wallflowers, as those of bearish persuasion have been in the past.
ÿ
At one end of the spectrum is the gung-ho approach embodied in a statement from TD Evergreen president Jeff Carney, who declared: "The only risk for investors in the year ahead is not being invested at all." investors in the year ahead is not being invested at all."
ÿ
Contrast that breezy assessment with the prophets of doom who see -- and, to be fair, have been seeing for some time -- all the signs of an "a-stock-alypse" in the making. Some doomsters are forecasting falls of 50% or more for equities.
ÿ
More typical of the Street's iffy mood is Merrill Lynch & Co.'s chief market analyst, Richard McCabe. He told reporters that a 25% decline in stock prices is possible this year, yet he steers clear of making an outright prediction.
ÿ
"The October decline was likely a wake-up call that markets, like trees, do not grow to the sky," McCabe said, referring to Oct. 27, when the Dow Jones industrial average plunged 554 points, its biggest one-day point drop inhistory.
ÿ
McCabe says the current bull market began in late 1994 and that bull markets usually run no longer than 31 1/82 years. He says stocks would be vulnerable to a "cyclical decline" in 1998.
ÿ
Even the Toronto-based Successful Investor newsletter, successfully bullish for the past three years, has reservations.
ÿ
"Stock prices are likely to move sideways to downward through the middle of [1998]," it said, adding that volatility will increase.
ÿ
Although the year may prove as profitable to many investors as past years, "it's also likely to be much more unnerving," the report continued.
ÿ
Merrill's chief investment strategist, Charles Clough, says bonds will be the best investment in 1998. He predicts global economies and U.S. corporate profits will slow because of economic turmoil in Asia. "The definitive financial event in 1998 will be lower interest rates," Clough said.
ÿ
Which way the stock market will swing this year appears to hinge on a combination of interest rates, bond prices, earnings growth, Asia and that most indefinable and most important of elements, sentiment. In Canada, throw in the shaky C$ and the outlook for natural resources.
ÿ
And yet as strategists and traders assess the risks and the rewards of staying in stocks, the buy-and-hold investor, rewarded for his patience these past three years with a doubling of his money in the U.S. market, is sticking to his plan despite a market that has been looking vulnerable now for months. If the new-age pundits are correct, the buy-and-hold brigade will continue to fare well into the next millennium.
ÿ
The Dow added 1459.98 or 22.6% to 7908.75 in 1997, but failed to recapture the high close of 8259.41 set all the way back on Aug. 6. The broader S&P 500-stock index fared even better, but also struggled to keep its gains toward the end of the year.
ÿ
On Bay Street, the Toronto Stock Exchange 300 composite index -- the benchmark for the Canadian market -- rose only 772.41 or 13% to 6699.44, the victim of a lacklustre resource sector that was supposed to be kicking in at this late stage of the economic cycle and providing the afterburners to catch the U.S. market.
ÿ
But analysts by and large are sticking to the script. A recent Reuters poll has found that analysts believe the Toronto market will gain substantially this year and into 1999 as commodities stocks rally. On average, the analysts see the TSE 300 up 17% from the close of 6641.9 on Dec. 12.
ÿ
While the TSE's 1997 gain of 13% (plus dividends reinvested) beat GICs and term deposits, the gap is not that great when, say, mutual fund fees are taken into account.
ÿ
Many of those in stocks were GIC refugees who had been persuaded to overcome their fear of risk by the lucrative rewards available in equities and equity dominated mutual funds. But as the Canadian market stumbles along about 10% below its record high, interest rates rise and RRSP season looms, it would be reasonable to expect that some refugees will return to GIC country.
ÿ
And if not out entirely out of stocks, a defensive position may suit. As 1997 drew to a close, mutual fund operators noted a lowering of risk tolerance.
ÿ
The North American bulls point to the following factors to explain their bullishness:

* Continuing favorable demographics see millions of baby-boomers pouring their savings into equity mutual funds and making rich returns.

* The lack of an alternative to the stock market while fixed-income instruments, such as GICs, are paying peanuts.

* An environment of solid growth and low inflation promises continued gains in earnings, which in turn fuel stock prices.

* Continued outstanding productivity gains for industry through technology applications.

* Continued benefits from globalization of trade, despite the warningsignals thrown up by the Asian crisis.

* The relatively stable world geopolitical scene.
ÿ
The bears, having spent most of the past three years in the wilderness living off scraps, are more than ever convinced their time is coming in 1998:

* The market is overvalued, and that indisputable fact will finally sink in with investors, although it has yet to do so on a consistent basis.

* Earnings growth cannot be maintained and earnings will not support such high valuations.

* Along a similar line, the Asian crisis is not about to go away, meaning that deflationary pressures -- not inflationary ones -- will set the agenda.

* The market has had three remarkable years. The odds against a fourth are very high.

For Michael Metz, chief investment strategist at CIBC Oppenheimer Inc., the odds are stacked against the U.S. market, because earnings expectations are far too high as conditions deteriorate in the face of the Asian crisis and a possible run-up of wage inflation in the services sector.
ÿ
As Moody's Investor Services Inc. said in a recent commentary: "The current mix of very low bond yields and steep price-to-earnings multiples underscores the vulnerability of both asset classes to a labor-cost-driven rise by inflation risks."
ÿ
Metz envisions a choppy market that could end up flat on the year.
ÿ
For some investors, the TSE's 13% gain in '97 will feel like a flat performance versus the Dow and the S&P 500. But the average annual total return since 1982 has been just 11% on the TSE against 15% for the S&P 500.
ÿ
One recent Wall Street poll suggested the consensus expectation was for U.S. stocks to fall back below a 10% return this year.
ÿ
Indeed, a return to more normal rates of return would not be surprising. But the market's mounting volatility as 1997 progressed was likely a precursor to a wild ride in 1998, a year in which anything can happen and probably will.
**********************************************************************************
**********************************************************************************