SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Zitel-ZITL What's Happening -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Deep Digm who wrote (13870)1/27/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: David A. Smallberg  Respond to of 18263
 
Oh, my, have I been misunderstood. Let me clear the air:
(1) I agree that Dr. Singh is a gentleman and have never
implied otherwise.
(2) I definitely *do* encourage postings by longs, as I said
in Message 2612909
(3) Explaining a possible origin of a belief does not imply
the writer holds the belief.

A question was asked: "Why do doctors think they are astute
investors?" I presented a possible origin of that stereotype,
qualified with phrases like "With no disrespect intended to
any particular doctor" and careful qualifications like "some
doctors" instead of "doctors" or "all doctors". I am therefore
puzzled by your comment "Generalizations like yours are the
foundation for other comments like; all blacks are lazy, all
Jews are cheap, all Polish people are stupid, ..." The
stereotype itself is not my belief, and if A's statement
"Some X are Y" is the foundation for B's comment "All X are
Y", then who is the bigot, A or B?

As an example, does explaining the origin of the money-grubbing
Jew stereotype make me an anti-Semite (or self-hating Jew, or
whatever)? No. [The origin as I understand it involves the
economics of medieval Europe, Christian prohibitions of the
time against charging interest for money lent (modern Islam
shares this), resentment of debtors against their creditors,
and denial of certain legal rights to Jews.]

> Dismissing his opinion based on your little anecdote, IMO ,
> is not only insulting, but may indicate that people with the
> middle initial "A" are in fact, small minded bigots.

If you can write this, you definitely misunderstood me. I hope
I've clarified things.