SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (31580)4/15/2020 1:22:11 PM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32917
 
The Java Dumper Bandit
or
TED Privatemessages

Well Jeff, it is time to put your shoes on the other feet.
The real math is in and it isn't pretty, you may not realize this but the scope of the problem and the range of answers has really accelerated overnight and the models are wrong. I was going to release a TED Talks but if it is already on TED Privatemessages I won't bother.
How should we respond to this problem? Can we help each other out and perhaps get our answers while we are all in isolation. I have some updates on the real math, not the fake math, this is the real decoy. I really prefer full bushel baskets of answers when I do math. This is just the first part, focusing on the shoes. You can check the math with any calculator. So we throw out the orange herrings and the 30/6=5 and replace it with math that takes into account we all have a left and a right shoe so 3a+3b=30.

3a + 3b = 30

3a=30-3b
3a=30-2b-b
3a/3=30/3+2b/3+b/3
a=10-2b-b/3
so if solution t=b/3 then b=3t
so a=10-6t-t=30-7t
then
a=10-7t and b=3t, and this is a set of linear coordinates, not a pair.
This solution is like getting home from Aldo and finding that the boots you bought are a size 9 1/2 right and a 10 left, someone else has the other half of your pair.

This is liquid math and if you are wondering what happens to all the t don't worry, it will get consumed.
This solution only gets more complicated. I spoke to Ell and Arr, the two ghosts in orange robes who are pictured in the equation. They explained that they have been starved and kept out of the sun for months so that they would look properly enigmatic and they advised their resemblance to cannoncini or a tiny relay baton was intended. They also confided that the two people who posed for the graphic were SI Ron (Soup Nazi) and Cheeky Kid. I asked about the logo on the shirts but they just looked away. On closer examination there is a distinct possibility that it might not read...
PLUCK YOUR
CHICKENS
but might actually say
HOARD SOME
CHARMIN
in which case we are all good I think.
It really is a lot clearer at 250% zoom



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (31580)4/15/2020 6:16:27 PM
From: elpolvo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32917
 
We actually had one more winner in TEDennis, though via PM. Like you,
he had many different answers depending on this or that. It took me a while
to pin him down to what he thought *should* not *could* be the right answer.
my initial thought was that this (?)
was this (7)

which woulda made the answer 70

so NOW we'd have three answers...

1) woulda = 70
2) coulda = 63 plus ?
3) shoulda = 106

if we add those three together and divide by three we have an
"average" answer of 79.666666(ad infinitum) plus (? ÷ 3)
(which you certainly wouldn't get from elpolvo or Graystone or
TEDennis because they're far from "average" mathematicians.)

since i already have one of the blue Silicon Investor T-shirts
i'm willing to withdraw my "coulda" answer from consideration.
this makes the new "average" answer 88 - creating a tie between
Kitskid (83) and longz (93) who only missed the "average" answer
of woulda and shoulda by 5.

but... i could be wrong... please check my math (and my latin)