SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (1221440)4/17/2020 8:57:14 AM
From: RetiredNow1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579980
 
OK. Let's tackle that head on. I personally think Trump is contradicting himself. I applauded him when he said he did NOT want to issue a nationwide lockdown directive, because frankly that's not up to him. The Exec Branch does not have that power under our Constitution. It is well documented that the liberals wanted him to do that and that absolutely would have been dictatorial, but he didn't and he said he didn't do it, because of states rights and that it was up to the governors to apply their discretion, while up to Trump to apply guidelines and advisories. Well done. But I am a strong believer in states' rights as outlined in the 10th amendment to the Constitution. Basically, here's a good summary of states rights versus federal rights under the Constitution:
In establishing American government’s power-sharing system of federalism, the Bill of Rights' 10th Amendment holds that all rights and powers not specifically reserved to Congress by Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution or to be shared concurrently by the federal and state governments are reserved by either the states or by the people.In order to prevent the states from claiming too much power, the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) holds that all laws enacted by the state governments must comply with the Constitution, and that whenever a law enacted by a state conflicts with a federal law, the federal law must be applied.
So when Trump reversed and contradicted himself by saying he has the absolute authority to re-open the economy, that made me uncomfortable. No he doesn't. He does NOT have absolute authority. However, he does have considerable power to influence the outcome. He can issue advisories and guidelines. He can work with Congress to pass federal laws to unify the economic policies and compel states to act according to federal law, which is consistent with the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution. He can give orders to the CDC and other regulatory bodies on their guidelines, which states listen to and coordinate with. So he does have power, just not the "absolute authority", which he claimed. His choice of words was poor, but that's a common malady with Trump.

Check out these articles, which discuss this interesting topic and give good, nuanced answers to how much power the Exec Branch has vs states rights. This is a 245 year old debate and a good one for Americans to understand.

This article discusses the LIMITS to Exec Branch powers:
Pandemic Federalism

This article discusses what the Exec Branch can do despite the limits:
Trump’s Backwards Federalism Could Actually Work