SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1221721)4/17/2020 4:23:30 PM
From: puborectalis3 Recommendations

Recommended By
J_F_Shepard
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577359
 
The bump in coronavirus cases is most pronounced in states without stay at home orders. Oklahoma saw a 53% increase in cases over the past week, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. Over same time, cases jumped 60% in Arkansas, 74% in Nebraska, and 82% in Iowa. South Dakota saw a whopping 205% spike.

The remaining states, North Dakota, Utah and Wyoming each saw an increase in cases, but more in line with other places that have stay-at-home orders. And all of those numbers may very well undercount the total cases, given a persistent lack of testing across the US.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1221721)4/17/2020 5:52:44 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577359
 
I think it may be possible for New York, but one of the main reasons is that NY has been on the brink of disaster with their health care for a long while. Even so, the surge capacity that was built for New York, still has not been used. So this doesn't seem to have been a capacity problem, which means flattening the curve would not have decreased the number of deaths, because the problem was not resources, but rather too many elderly and unhealthy people with compromised immune systems that made them more susceptible to this virus. In addition, the community spread appears to 20-30 times what was originally thought due to how fast this virus spreads. So the rational part of me says, this was a rocket that we would have never caught, even if Cuomo had acted a month earlier. The virus was going to spread fast, regardless. It's a conundrum.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1221721)4/17/2020 9:24:14 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577359
 
Hospitals are going to be crushed

.....except they are NOT

I keep repeating about the difference between California and New York because the differences are striking, and they support my view that New York was a few days too late

...if you think that a few (3-4) days late in calling for a lock down was the difference in the number of cases in Ca vs NY............you are a complete idiot.