SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dvdw© who wrote (156643)4/18/2020 10:32:06 AM
From: Joseph Silent5 Recommendations

Recommended By
abuelita
bull_dozer
Gemlaoshi
Secret_Agent_Man
Sultan

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217553
 
Thanks. That was interesting, from someone sharp

and thoughtful.

You are brought up in one system. That system is you. If it feels right, you'll think everyone should have it. For example, if the system is democracy and you can say wonderful things about it, you'll find find a way to force feed it to everyone else ..... especially if in this way you can co-opt some or all of of what they have materially. Ultimately they will lose their culture because you'll give them McDonald's and bury their art, and because you feel like God, you'll create their men in your image. If this sounds brutal, the truth invariably is.

You are brought up in another system. It does not feel as good as that glitzy system over there (well, the grass is always greener somewhere) and the people over there say "yeah, come on over". And just as is the case in your system, that system over there has its clever people, its sharks, its clowns and its dumbos. Everyone goes to make up a society and people use other people all the time.

Freedom is a nebulous thing. Law is a nebulous thing. These are what somebody with more power than you can make them be, and you can twiddle your thumbs and wonder what to do about it. In the end you convince yourself that freedom must be the ability to fight what is being done to you and not be persecuted for it. Then you spend your life doing just that, and at the end of your life you write papers and give talks on how your fight has worked. But was your life free? You were captured by that task which did not give you the freedom you wanted in the first place.

Life is just this. You have more of something or you have less of something. There is always something someone else has that you want (gold, freedom, hair, teeth :) ) .... and when you start to think about it more deeply you face the truth of how unsettling deep thoughts can be. So you go back to markets and politics where everybody feels safer. :) So this is all true, but said in some jest.

If freedom means the ability to waltz about with asymptomatic covid and share it with everyone else then that is the freedom we must all settle for. If freedom comes with restrictions, then we should understand what and why we have those restrictions. If freedom is a calculation that 5% of the young and 50% of the old can and must die so the young can move on to driverless cars and bigger carnival ships ..... then we start to realize that we don't really understand what freedom means. We just experience examples of what it should not mean and we know we do not like it. But we cannot know the real cost of what we'd like.



To: dvdw© who wrote (156643)4/18/2020 12:45:20 PM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
ggersh
Secret_Agent_Man

  Respond to of 217553
 
my dad's stuff is at the same institute oac.cdlib.org

am familiar w/ its workings

I think the professor is wrong, to very wrong

my brother, at age 77, and sister, at age 76, are still enjoying their work

my dad worked up to 30-days before he passed away

the idea of retiring at age 50, 55, 60, 65, xx is faulty, when life expectancy is xz

social issues are invariably self-correcting, one way or another

recommendation, getmoregold

international.stanford.edu

The Jack Chen Archives at the Hoover Institution

OIA had the opportunity to speak with Jack Chen'’s widow, Yuan-tsung Chen, author of Return to the Middle Kingdom: One Family, Three Revolutionaries, and the Birth of Modern China which chronicles the lives of Ah Chen, Eugene and Jack Chen.

In August 2012, the Hoover Institution acquired a collection of forty original drawings and cartoons, letters and family photographs belonging to the late Jack Chen, a noted author/artist. The son of Trinidadian born Eugene Chen, who was most well known for being Sun Yat-sen’s chief secretary, legal/international affairs advisor (1918-1925), and Foreign Minister of the Wuhan government (1926-27), Jack was born in 1908 in the Port of Spain, Trinidad. Until his death in 1995, he crossed thousands of miles living in several countries while experiencing a colorful, sometimes turbulent life. His journey took him from a mansion in Trinidad to a peasant village in rural China to the halls of academia at Cornell University.

Jack’s writing and art highlighted the cultural and political landscape, whether it was the threat of Japanese aggression or the Cultural Revolution in China or the Chinese immigrant experience in America. However, Jack was not merely an observer, but also an active participant. Under Mao Zedong’s leadership and through the mobilization of Red Guards, the Cultural Revolution started in 1966 with the goals of literally “revolutionizing culture.” Jack was not spared, and he was sentenced to hard labor and toiled alongside peasant farmers in the rural countryside. His experience is recounted in his book, A Year In Upper Felicity: Life in a Chinese Village During the Cultural Revolution.

Later, Jack went to the United States, where he faced another challenge in the form of racial discrimination that he documents in The Chinese of America. In Hoover fellow Thomas Sowell’s New York Times book review, he writes, “Chinese Americans have a remarkable – almost unbelievable history, and no one has recounted it better than Jack Chen in this book.”

Q.: Jack was educated at Moscow’s Polygraphic Institute where he learned about European art. How did his interest in political cartoons develop?Jack, in his childhood, loved to scribble. The first cartoonist who attracted his attention was David Low of the London Star. He was impressed by the Englishman’s sense of humor and quiet persuasion and later on he incorporated what he had learned from David Low into his art.

The English edition of People’s Tribune, funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, needed a cartoon to accompany each editorial. Jack, without knowing a thing about revolution, stumbled into his first revolutionary job and accidentally launched his career as the first editorial cartoonist of modern China.

Working for Wuhan’s People’s Tribune, Jack discovered a group of American artists drawing for the Marxist magazine New Masses. Fred Ellis, Robert Minor, etc. and they taught him how an artist could provide a strong social commentary through the use of cartoons. During this period, Jack’s eyes opened to all the miseries of a semi-colonized country, and he was compelled to report the injustices that he had witnessed.

His art was for the revolution, and he would use his art to fight for the rights of the poor, the needy, and the oppressed. His study of European art quickly led him to spot the kin spirit in Francisco de Goya and Honoré Daumier. Goya showed him that by caricaturing the characters in his drawings or paintings, he could deal a devastating blow to those who were corrupted by power. It was Daumier who inspired Jack to portray the downtrodden with beauty and dignity.

Q: Painting in China is one of its earliest art forms while the genre of political cartoons in the 1930’s was relatively young and not considered a serious art form. How did Jack deal with this criticism?Once I asked Jack the same question. I knew Jack’s first love was oil painting and he was talented. If he had devoted his time, energy, and effort to oil paintings, he would have gone far. However, he chose to draw cartoons for their mass appeal and effectiveness in raising people’s political consciousness. He said, “I did not think pursuing my personal dream was more important than doing my bit to fight back against the Fascist Japan’s invasion.”

Q: Which works do you think represent his best work and why?Nazi German bombs, Jack told me, had destroyed almost all of Jack’s best drawings, when London had nearly burned to the ground. However, in my opinion, I would consider the following drawings representative of Jack’s best work:

1. The cartoon (above) was printed in Life Magazine in early 1938. The caption read “…a peasant squatting beside his dead child, looking into a future in which there is no other course but to take up his gun and fight Japan. The emotion, the pathos and the dignity of the figure suggest the best cartoons of Daniel R. Fitzpatrick of St. Louis Post-Dispatch.”

2. The cartoon detail (below) in the British Museum illustrates the rising sun of Japan as a huge skull coming up over the horizon of China. In the foreground, you see small figures with arms outstretched in the air; you can almost hear the anguish in their cries for help. On Jan. 15, 1938, the New York Journal-American reviewed a collection of Jack’s works that included this drawing. The reviewer writes “…Jack Chen is known to both the Chinese and Japanese as ‘Bitter Brush’, because he has visually portrayed the fiery anti-Japanese sentiments his father portrayed in words.”

3. Finally, the cartoon detail (below), that is on page 286 of my book illustrates a war refugee-turned-beggar; we can see the influence of Goya’s later works that characterize the brutality and darkness of war. The picture conveys the horror of a Japanese-occupied Beijing through the dramatically distorted body and face of a helpless victim.

Q: What is the artistic and political significance of Jack’s work?On March 12, 1927, Jack’s first cartoon was published in People’s Tribune at Wuhan. The picture was of a coolie carrying a pole across his shoulders, a basket on each end. One was marked “wage”, the other “work”. The cartoon accompanied the editorial that hoped to add ten cents (Chinese) to the coolie’s daily wage of twenty-five cents for sixteen hours work. Thus was born the political cartoon of modern China. Since that day Jack was never out of touch with China’s revolutionary movement. In 1935, when the Chinese revolution was at its lowest ebb, Jack drew for the Moscow-published Chinese newspaper, National Salvation Times. In the history of the Communist Party, it was credited for exuding warmth and light for the revolutionaries lost in the cold, and following the light they were able to regroup.

From 1931 to 1935, the Japanese militarists invaded and occupied the northeast and north China. They announced to the world that the Chinese people had no will to resist what they could offer: the prosperity of greater East Asia. In early 1936 Jack came back to China and planned to organize an exhibit of anti-Fascist art in retort.

Jack mentored the new generation of young artists. He shared his albums of the work of Daumier, David Low, Boris Efimov, American artists Ellis and Gropper, etc. and helped them to create a new, constructive note into their art. He worked with each and every one of the 28 young artists whose drawings and wood engravings he had selected. The reviews from Moscow, London, New York, and other cities spoke volumes about what Jack had achieved. The News Chronicle of London enthused about the exhibit: “All the exhibitors are under 30. They have broken away from the old, dreamy, hill-and-blossom pictures, and now depict realistically – yet with artistic selection – the life of their countrymen…they wish to make the coolie self-conscious that he lives like a pig.”

Q: What role did Jack play in US-China diplomatic relations?In late autumn of 1971, Jack went on a speaking tour to North America. He received invitations from Yale University, Southern Illinois University, and York University in Canada. His speeches were well received and more invitations came from Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Stanford/Hoover, UC Berkeley, altogether more than twenty universities. As a result of the successful speaking tour, subsequent invitations came from think tanks such as Council on Foreign Relations and the Brookings Institute. Many among Jack’s audience were very influential and what they said or did greatly impacted the US-China policy.

Jack spoke on a wide range of subjects. Jack introduced them to a China that was a revolution in progress. It was not a monolith that was all good or bad. It was made up of a myriad of people with all the greatness and frailties of human beings, so that the sum of their actions worked out to be sometimes good and sometimes bad. There seemed to be no simple answer to what was wrong or what was right about it, and he, Jack Chen, had neither the capability nor the ambition even to pretend to be such an arbiter. All he believed he could do was to push the equation a little to the good side of the ledger of destiny.

The Jack Chen Archives will be on display at the Herbert Hoover Memorial Exhibit Pavilion (next to Hoover Tower) from April 23, 2013 – February 2014.

Special thanks go to Lisa Nguyen and Rayan Ghazal at the Hoover Institution, Mary Ginsberg and the Trustees at the British Museum and the Jack Chen Estate for assistance with the images that accompany this article. Permission to re-print images has been granted by the Jack Chen Estate.



To: dvdw© who wrote (156643)4/19/2020 8:26:22 PM
From: sense  Respond to of 217553
 
Otherwise your own momentum is all you will be left with. In that case, your/all will show, just another set of lazy beliefs who've failed you.

youtube.com

I'll note... none of us gets out of this alive. The Zero Hedge logo paired with the quote "On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero."

But, what you do with that awareness is a CHOICE. You can believe, if you want to, that your momentum in life isn't enough... not enough even to make the effort to continue living worthwhile. Or, instead, you can "rage, rage, against the dying of the light," speak the truth, and Do not go gentle Into that good night.

But, beliefs don't "fail"... instead, people make bad choices. The core in ideas is more or less static... which still doesn't make ideas more or less equivalent ? Innovation might add to the core of a concept, building upon it, or effort may end in chipping something away as a sculptor might... to find more inside than was apparent at first...

But, failure is a function of adopting error... evaluating in error, adding or taking away things that generate results, but end without making positive contributions ? The ideas aren't what fails. Our choices don't get a pass. The choices one makes were either more right, or more wrong, and people opting to think one idea or another is "better"... and then being proven wrong... isn't the fault of the idea ?


All of which is essential in understanding that responsibility for your choices... is about more than outcomes.

Outcomes always depend on others, at least, they will whenever we judge value based on what others are willing to value, and how much. Ultimately, that requires surrendering to others judgment... even when they clearly are wrong.

Choose well... choose rightly... and live courageously...

Can you say you have lived, otherwise ?

Note, that seems it is inherently in conflict with what you do in markets... where the whole point is "other focused": as the goal is to figure out what OTHERS value... rightly or wrongly... and to figure out how that will change over time. Your goal is only to get there ahead of them... to sell them what they want at a profit... when they want it most... whether or not they're aware of what they''ll want or need beforehand. The early bird gets the worm... is the only aphorism that comes to mind... Surely there must be something more powerful that could be said about this idea ?

Because, in the end, not only can you not take it with you, you also must leave it all behind... for others to deal with as best they can without you. How well you do that matters ?

My grandfather taught me two things:

1. Whatever it is you do in life... do the best at it that you can. All the art in living life, as all art, is in the work, and in finding paths to expressing excellence in that work... even in the simplest tasks.

2. Whatever it is you work on... leave it better than you found it.

And if you do that, only... you are a success... and will have no reason for regrets.

Finding that point of balance... between what you value... and what others value... is the key ?




To: dvdw© who wrote (156643)4/20/2020 6:19:54 AM
From: dvdw©  Respond to of 217553
 
Arrests in Hong Kong, reading this piece the grounds seem absurd. But exactly what one would expect.
qz.com



To: dvdw© who wrote (156643)4/21/2020 3:24:19 AM
From: Dr. Voodoo  Respond to of 217553
 
Really great. Thanks for posting.

First comment is hysterical:

"If you close your eyes, you will believe that Joe Pesci has an enormous take on world affairs."