Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (26056)	1/27/1998 9:47:00 AM
From: Seth L.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Hi Mike! Good luck. IMO if you do your DD and you have fare approach to your questions/statements than they should be handled differently. Of course I am just 1 person here. There are about 100 other people yet to comment on your latest post. Seth

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (26056)	1/27/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: Larrie Woods	Respond to of 41046

You will be judged by your actions. L

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (26056)	1/27/1998 10:09:00 AM
From: Martin P. Smith	Respond to of 41046

Mike, I suggest that a first step before you post here is to step back and make sure you have done some reasearch on the topic at hand. I know what pissed me off about your posts was a combination of the "arrogance" and the fact that a little research would have proven your postition inaccurate. You know the posts in question. The reaction to the first of these posts should have been a warning that you were dealing with folks who know this company a lot better than you at this point. The value of DD in a company cannot be understated especially in high tech arena where seemingly innocuous items on a corporate asset list are often of the most value. Martin Smith

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (26056)	1/27/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: topwright	Respond to of 41046

Mike, my credo has always been to accept everyon on an equal basis and with an open mind. Not until they do something to jeopardize that relationship will I alter my views. Unfortunately you have gotten off on the wrong footing in my book, and now your words fall on deaf ears. You will now have to earn your way back based on actions, not cheap words. Don't get me wrong, I fully accept your apology and am willing to forgive anyone that makes an honest effort to make a change in their shortcomings as a person. I still stand with the conviction that opposing views and honest concerns should be aired on the other thread that I created. I assure you that it was not created to send you or anyone else into Coventry, afterall we should all have questions when our hard money is at stake. Honest concern will be met with honest debate, that is my promise to you. Good luck, RB