Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1223474)	4/22/2020 12:02:52 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577030

" During 2015, Dr. Fauci has been videotaped saying that the next administration would experience "a surprise outbreak" I wonder if this is why he could predict that? Fauci’s NIAID Funded Wuhan Lab Scientists To Research Bat ...

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1223474)	4/22/2020 12:08:38 PM
From: Winfastorlose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577030

Fauci is a Hillary lover. He would probably like nothing more than to wrap his arms around her fat cankles and give her feet a tongue bath. He is a weird little puppy.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1223474)	4/29/2020 3:18:07 PM
From: RetiredNow	1 Recommendation Recommended By Taro Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577030

I know everyone will do their best to pin this on Trump. What I see is that this was a systemic lack of preparedness. And the truth is that I can understand lack of preparedness, because none of us have seen anything like this in our lifetimes. The truth is that no President would have been better prepared, so it was always going to boil down to reaction speed and the quality of the response. Trump has done well on both of those scores. However, what I cannot forgive that every agency involved lacked brainpower and an ability to get organized, to think logically, and to fashion proportionate responses. They didn't put the right statistics together to make unbiased decisions. They didn't stop to question when people engaged in scare tactics and apocalyptic scenario peddling to get extreme measures in place. They were not nuanced and not focused on what was really needed. The lockdown was a sledgehammer to push a pin into a drywall. 99.5% of the population will survive with no longer term problems if they get infected. The ultimate death rate on this will likely be close to the flu, somewhere between 0.1% to 0.5%. The lockdown has put 26 million people into poverty and we'll experience the Greatest Depression as a result of it. The costs are greater than the benefit. What we should have done is quarantine the vulnerable and ask them to separate from their family and friends likely to infect them. For everyone else, the government should never have engaged in the overreach of incarcerating them in their homes and ordering them to close their businesses. Not only was it not Constitutional, but it was immoral, wrong, and will ultimately be ineffective, as Sweden and Taiwan have proven. They had a more nuanced and thoughtful response and it is working without destroying their economy and without impoverishing their people. All we have done is to hasten the day that the US will no longer be a force in the world, which conversely hastens the day when we will all have to bow to the will of the Chinese Communists.