Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (1223683)	4/22/2020 8:35:31 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577893

Dr. Rick Bright, the director of the federal office involved in a coronavirus vaccine, says he was reassigned after questioning hydroxychloroquine treatment. More fakenews and Mr Trump said he never hear of the guy at the press conference today, and neither did Dr Fauci. Please try to be accurate. We don't appreciate fakenews here.

To: puborectalis who wrote (1223683)	4/23/2020 11:22:42 AM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Recommended By Bill IC720 locogringo Tenchusatsu Respond to of 1577893

Media Push Fake News About FDA Official Supposedly Fired Over Opposing Hydroxychloroquine, Then the Real Story Comes OutPosted at 10:00 am on April 23, 2020 by Bonchie Share On Facebook Share On Twitter Christine Blasey Ford takes a break in her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Thursday, Sept. 27, 2018 on Capitol Hill in Washington. Lawyers seated are Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich. (Saul Loeb/ Pool Image via AP) It’s almost like The New York Times is nothing but a partisan gossip rag. Yesterday, a story was put out by Maggie Haberman that made a rather convenient claim that just so happened to reinforce every media narrative. Namely, that an FDA official named Rick Bright was fired for selflessly sounding the alarm on the supposed vast dangers of hydroxychloroquine. The New York Times ?@nytimes Breaking News: A doctor who led a U.S. agency helping to develop a coronavirus vaccine says he was removed because he questioned the promotion of hydroxychloroquine, a drug endorsed by President Trump without rigorous vetting t.co t.co Coronavirus Live Updates: Doctor Says He Was Removed After Questioning Drug Promoted by TrumpThe first known U.S. death from the illness came in early February in California. An order by Trump will impose a 60-day halt in issuing green cards. Some stability returned to the energy market. nytimes.com The New York Times ?@nytimes For today, April 22, here’s how to follow the latest on the coronavirus outbreak. Live updates from around the world: nyti.ms The latest in New York: nyti.ms Markets news: nyti.ms 4,045 4:08 PM - Apr 22, 2020 Twitter Ads info and privacy 3,184 people are talking about this But, like all stories that appear in the Times and other mainstream outlets, it’s always best to give them a few hours. In this case, it didn’t take long for the real story to start coming out and you’ll be shocked to learn that Haberman’s original piece was completely wrong. For example, Bright himself requested the FDA give emergency approval for hydroxychloroquine. jerylbier ?@JerylBier In March, Rick Bright requested the FDA issue an "Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of oral formulations of chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate for the treatment of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)..." t.co 416 9:34 PM - Apr 22, 2020 Twitter Ads info and privacy 305 people are talking about this Does that sound like someone deeply skeptical of the drug who’s just attempting to stop that dastardly orange man from harming people? It gets worse, though. Dan Diamond ?@ddiamond · 16h Replying to @ddiamond UPDATE: Rick Bright, vaccine expert who said he was ousted for opposing Trump’s drive to acquire malaria drugs, recently praised the acquisition in internal emails. t.co Dan Diamond ?@ddiamond The Trump administration has been working to oust Bright since last year, as officials battled with him over his management and leadership. With permission, sharing this time-stamped text from individual with knowledge of those fights. 589 7:05 PM - Apr 22, 2020 Twitter Ads info and privacy 409 people are talking about this Not only was Bright not fired for anything to do with hydroxychloroquine, his ouster has been in the making long before anyone was even concerned with the Wuhan virus. Apparently, Bright has a history of insubordination and believing he has more authority than he does. Knowing that he was going to be fired anyway, he’s now spinning a fake narrative that he was simply a hero trying to save lives. But are you ready for the best part? He’s now hired Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyer, so you know this is totally legit. Maggie Haberman ?@maggieNYT BRIGHT is being represented by Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, who have a whistleblower practice (and who also repped Christine Blasey Ford) t.co Coronavirus Live Updates: Woman’s Death in California Upends Virus Timeline in U.S.The first known death from the illness came in early February. An order by Trump will impose a 60-day halt in issuing green cards. Some stability returned to the energy market. nytimes.com 816 4:29 PM - Apr 22, 2020 Twitter Ads info and privacy 470 people are talking about this Yes, Bright is hiring Debra Katz, whose malfeasance during the Kavanaugh hearings is well known. No doubt this is an attempt to push Bright as a “whistle-blower,” either for money or via another Congressional farce. It’s also not a coincidence that Haberman knew Bright was hiring Katz almost immediately. The likely explanation is that this entire story came from Katz in the first place and Haberman either got worked over or willingly chose to be her mouthpiece. There’s a reason the Hillary campaign described Maggie Haberman as a reporter they can count on. She and the Times continue to put out half-baked, false stories knowing they can hide behind the idea that they were simply reporting what they were told. Apparently, verifying information isn’t within their purview. Take this deflection of responsibility for example. Seth Mandel ?@SethAMandel The NYT story about Bright was not structured as a story, it was more like a gossip item, forthrightly saying the whole item was “he claims.” Ppl still read it as something other than it was, which is not NYT fault. What was it exactly? It should’ve been obvious: 378 8:18 PM - Apr 22, 2020 Twitter Ads info and privacy 131 people are talking about this It’s not the Times’ fault for making such a serious charge in the form of a gossip item, failing to check even the most basic facts? Yeah, I’m gonna have to disagree on that one. This is absolutely the Times’ fault and they continue to show themselves to be a totally worthless rag.