Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (13491)	1/27/1998 12:54:00 PM
From: Elllk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

Zeev Re: <<Wendy, I am not sure if you directed your question directly to me, but if indeed the man in question engaged in the non intercousial activity, he broke two biblically given laws, the first is (transliterated from Hebrew, the King James version is welcome): "Thou shall not spill your semen in vain" and the second is "thou shall multiply ...">> It has always struck me that a corollary of the above laws is that men and women should be forcing themselves to have intercourse as often as possible everyday. Failure to do so may not, technically speaking, be a sin of inappropriate intromission but it is a failure to maximize appropriate intromission, and thereby a failure to maximize the opportunities to multiply. As such, it certainly would qualify as a sin omission, if not some subset of intromission. Larry