SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Electric who wrote (34254)1/27/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: broken_cookie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58727
 
Electric,

I didn't say I agreed with it either. It just struck me as strongly worded.

All analysts comments are to be taken with a grain of salt. The tremendous conflicts of interest that reside within brokerage houses blow my mind. How often have we seen a flurry of upgrades around a top while the fundies unload? CNBC did a study and found that if you traded analysts picks from any brokerage house you would lose money 100% of the time.

They do have the power to move stocks however unfortunately. Perhaps if Kevin has his portable bloomie he could tell you what the blocks are doing.

Good luck.



To: Electric who wrote (34254)1/27/1998 12:17:00 PM
From: Judy  Respond to of 58727
 
TT's S&P futures signal this am

"Buy signal triggered earlier this morning at 971 on the March futures; currently futures are trading at about that level"



To: Electric who wrote (34254)1/27/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: donald sew  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58727
 
Electric,

Per last Friday's technicals, IBM was a CLASS 1 BUY, and it still went down futher. This is a common occurance when news comes out, which over-ride the technicals. The news is still too recent for the technicals to come back into play.

Sorry, I couldnt give you better news.

Seeya