SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1225701)4/30/2020 10:01:23 AM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579130
 
"We had old-fashioned tests that didn't work ... they were broken" -- this is complete nonsense from Trump. The novel coronavirus didn't exist until late 2019, so there were no tests for him to inherit.
@atrupar



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1225701)4/30/2020 4:46:42 PM
From: PKRBKR1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 1579130
 
(He doesn't seem to understand that infectious disease don't just magically vanish)


Actually they most often do. Typically due to mutations.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1225701)4/30/2020 4:52:44 PM
From: PKRBKR1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579130
 
(experts say more testing is necessary)

I'm having issues with the logic here. If one only tests positive for two or three weeks with the virus is the plan to test the entire population within every two week period? If an instantaneous test existed this could be viable but still unrealistic. Only those with symptoms or likely exposed are seeking tests and we should soon be at capacity to manage that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News