Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications-News Only!!! (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: username who wrote (1064)	1/28/1998 8:43:00 PM
From: Maverick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1629

MFS founder plots big IP net By Tim Greene Network World, 1/26/98 Omaha, Neb. - Level 3 Communications, Inc. is betting billions that when it comes to delivering data, voice, and video IP is it. While the industry at large is still trying to figure out what it will mean long-term, the group of veterans at this start-up says there is just one network for the future - the Internet. Level 3 promises to offer IP data services in six cities this year, expanding to 60 cities by 2001. Voice and video services, as well as quality-of-service (QOS) guarantees will come in about two years, according to the company's CEO, James Crowe. Level 3 boasts plans for a 20,000-mile fiber-optic network in the U.S., transoceanic cables and foreign networks, and is blessed with very deep pockets. So the company will be a force to be reckoned with whether its vision is right or wrong. There is another reason to listen to Level 3, Crowe and Kiewit Diversified Group, with roots in mining and construction,have done it before. They combined to build MFS Communications, Inc. from the ground up as the first major competitive local carrier. Started with $500 million in Kiewitt funding, MFS sold for $14 billion in 1996. Part of the Level 3 promise: network infrastructure costs so low that it can ignite a price war with the established phone companies, analysts said.

To: username who wrote (1064)	1/28/1998 8:45:00 PM
From: Maverick	Respond to of 1629

MFS, Prt II ''It's going to be a wonderful free-for-all,'' said Frank Dzubeck, president of Communications Network Architects, Inc., a Washington, D.C. consultancy. It is uncertain what Level 3 will charge customers, but ''the pricing differential will be so astronomic that the established carriers will have to react,'' Dzubeck said. ''These guys are really going to have an impact.'' Dzubeck said it costs an IP service provider a mil _ one one-thousandth of a cent _ to offer a minute of long-distance voice service. The cost for a traditional phone company is more like 2 cents. MFS II? Under the Level 3 model, customers will buy not dial tone, but Web-tone access to an IP network. The backbone of that network will be all fiber, guaranteeing ample bandwidth to bear scores of gigabits per second of user traffic. Traffic among destinations on the Level 3 network could be assured QoSesbecause Level 3 would have control of the entire network being used. Traffic traveling to other carriers' networks for destinations off the Level 3 network might or might not support those QoSes, he said. For some destinations, traffic might use the public Internet, where today no service quality can be guaranteed. Business-quality voice will probably not be ready until 1999, he said. A service based on the most inexpensive backbone can still be costly, said Bill Homa, communications director for Hannaford Bros. and Co., a supermarket chain based in Scarborough, Maine, which is looking at ATM to anchor its network. ''The key is who controls the local loop. If you have multiple locations, it's going to be expensive if you have to use the local loop for access,'' Homa said. Level 3 will pay those access fees except where Level 3 can run fiber directly to the customer, Crowe said. But he would not say what impact access fees would have on pricing, which is still being worked out.

To: username who wrote (1064)	1/28/1998 8:46:00 PM
From: Maverick	Respond to of 1629

MFS, Part III However, he did say flat rates would be available for users who want it, as well as usage-based billing. Not your father's Internet Level 3 is the most well-funded domestic player among new IP carriers, but the boldest is CTR Group, Ltd. CTR has started up Project Oxygen, a plan to circle the globe with nearly 200,000 miles of fiber-optic cable to support a Super Internet that will support all services (NW, Jan. 19, page 12). Smaller regional carriers that follow the same model are sprouting up, too, including XCOM Technologies, Inc. in Cambridge, Mass. It could affiliate itself with companies such as Level 3 to offer IP QoS over a wider geographic area.

To: username who wrote (1064)	1/29/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: Maverick	Respond to of 1629

Merger, Part III Already Cabletron and 3Com are worlds apart from a competitive perspective. How often do you hear of Cabletron in the commodity modem or adapter markets, which represent an overwhelming majority of 3Com's business? While Cabletron and Bay often compete, as do 3Com and Bay, the real unifying force in this market is Cisco. Further, we already know that the traditional datacom outsiders, such as Alcatel, Lucent, Nortel, Siemens, Nokia and NEC, are sniffing around the internetworking space and have already begun to snap up the smaller fish (look at Nokia buying up IP Switching creator Ipsilon). It is only a matter of time before one of these firms decides to move up the food chain. Their goal isn't necessarily to dominate the LAN market, but to leverage the LAN and routing/switching technologies with their own datacom and WAN technologies (again, see Nokia and Ipsilon). The rumor mill has recently linked Cabletron with Nortel and Bay with Lucent. Yes, just rumors, but you have to admit that they do make a bit of sense. Not many in the industry would be surprised or disappointed if these turned out to be self-fulfilling rumors. Now I've been in the market long enough to know that there are no "sure" things, except for perhaps death, taxes and the combination of the two: estate taxes. So I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a bit (perhaps a lot) of disagreement over my predictions or my logic. On the other hand, what good are predictions if everybody agrees? In fact, when everybody does agree, that's when I start to get worried. So what do you think?

To: username who wrote (1064)	1/29/1998 6:40:00 PM
From: Maverick	Respond to of 1629

Merger, Part IV Tom Anderson - 04:19pm Jan 22, 1998 EST (#1 of 2) I don't know why the uproar to Fred's original predictions. In light of this week's consortium announcement by MFST, CPQ and INTC, I think he should write a third column entitled "Then There Were Two". The clout these three have in the marketplace, not to mention the cash to back their play, matches the potential economic rewards of broadband communications over the Internet. It's a direct challenge to the telecos and their POTS, particularly with last week's announcement out of Omaha re an IPO called Level 3 built around a new, nationwide fiber optic network that would seriously challange the need for much of the Fab Four's products. Everyone is vying to be a part of the consortium, including PAIR with its continuous connection DMT modem. The ISPs and cable companies have to be sweating because they cannot meet the public's demand for speed and bandwidth. Bay is vunerable and Lucent has announced it WILL be a part of the action. Wintel wants Lucent on the team, if for no other reason of its reputation and ability to deliver product. INTC would love a BAY/LU combo because David House is kin and a known entity. Siemans and Noika are not going to concede Europe to Gates, so Cabletron and 3Com are in play. That leaves Cisco to evolve into something new, and they certainly have the cash, management and market support to do it. I'd like Fred's take on this. I feel he owes us a revisit to his predictions in light of this week's consortium announcement. Please!!!