Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Starduster who wrote (9597)	1/27/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: jerry anchin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

My Lava Lamp spelled out the following message in Red Letters last night: NMS by end of January . Good luck to all. Jerry

To: Starduster who wrote (9597)	1/27/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: Jack Zahran	Respond to of 31646

Sandie, I have resolved that the best way to handle the NMS is not to count on it. It is taking too much attention from the core. NMS will add only if the company is worth investing in long term. I believe now more than ever before that TPRO is a solid investment, I don't care if NMS comes in Jan, Feb or March, I have a long position and will only get out if any of the fundamentals change. My expectations for the 2nd quarter are a significant Gross Revenue increase over last year same quarter. In addition, I am looking for two things in order of importance: 1. A reduction of debt 2. a small but significant Y2K component. If they have small earnings or a small loss, I can live with that since they are growing at a significantly faster rate. As far as reduction of debt, they have already retired half of what they started 97 with, leaving them with $250,000 (verify?) more each month in saved interest fees. But I am speculating that their operations costs increased in the light of Staff growth, more Y2K marketing costs as well as R&D on the UtilityY2KOne product (not released yet). The debt they have remaining is well within their debt to asset ratio requirement, so they are in good shape there, but no debt would even be better, I'll be haapy to read that they reduced it by another Million. I believe this will be a watershed quarter for the company, and thus the Share Holders Meeting accompanied with the name change. You MM shorts: time to go long. Regards, JZ