Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : BAY Ntwks (under House) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RFF who wrote (3855)	1/27/1998 2:31:00 PM
From: jethro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6980

Bay is really starting to amaze me, it's like they're moving at light speed under House. biz.yahoo.com jethro

To: RFF who wrote (3855)	1/27/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: w2j2	Respond to of 6980

Remember a few months back when Worth magazine dedicated a whole issue to Intel? You should have sold. I have just sold some of my Cisco, and the Fortune article confirms my viewpoint.

To: RFF who wrote (3855)	1/27/1998 11:21:00 PM
From: Beachbumm	Respond to of 6980

You know, back when obituaries were being written for BAY all over the place, one of the reasons that I invested in it was its customer base. That and the balance sheet convinced me that this company was not going out of business. Now, I think BAY's prospects are extremely promising. This Fortune article just confirms that we are in that sort of market where fear of making mistakes reigns. No investor/fund manager wants to have anything less than prime rib on his menu right now. I mean, has any analyst called Mr. Chambers yet to ask him just what did happen to Granite and a couple hundred million? That disappearing act should be in Vegas. I still say that one day the emperor CSCO will be seen to have no clothes. Beachbumm