To: Nazbuster who wrote (925 ) 1/27/1998 8:32:00 PM From: Vanni Resta Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1253
Daniel Gold: You said before there was no evidence of racist attitudes towards Singapore brokers in the Creaf thread. Well, I'm not going to come to any conclusions, for you. But read these, and draw your own. "i don't need to know what some singapore broker says.. i need to know that they aren't getting hurt on the side by the asian flu.."Message 3229705 "Singapore brokering houses don't understand Creative, period.... I can tell you those Singapore Analylicks don't understand the business model of creaf... if these analylicks have to keep changing their estimate every few days, what credibility and respects should we give them?"Message 3231490 "I don't pay very much attention to those Singapore analysts, their ability are to be doubt."Message 3231795 "I agree with PR that Singapore bokerage firm sucks. They only understand their local business models. They don't even see the evolving technological changes that is happening in the PC industry"Message 3235362 "Note that all the names you supplied are Stock Brokering house in Singapore. I will not give much thought on their analysis reasons given earlier."Message 3237152 "Doesn't matter how many singapore brokerage firms changed their earnings revisions, or which way they changed, what's being compared with is the First Call (read non-Singapore) estimates."Message 3245848 Do you think that all of these posts more or less conclude that analysts in Singapore as a group are incompetent and irrelevant, based soley on the fact that they are Singaporian? You also wrote: "Where did you see me condone racist comments? That is a SERIOUS accusation." By denying it exists, not to mention by not speaking out against it, don't you think you are condoning it? Happy Investing! Vanni