To: chronicle who wrote (1228215 ) 5/20/2020 1:18:47 PM From: Maple MAGA 1 RecommendationRecommended By
Respond to Who are we, to judge them?Austria: Muslim migrant double murderer mocks his victims, says “Only Allah can judge me” ROBERT SPENCER Reliance of the Traveller , a classic manual of Islamic sacred law, explains matter-of-factly that “the indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man. The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth that of a Muslim.” (o4.9)A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , agrees, stating: “Thus if [a] Muslim commits adultery his punishment is 100 lashes, the shaving of his head, and one year of banishment. But if the man is not a Muslim and commits adultery with a Muslim woman his penalty is execution. … Similarly if a Muslim deliberately murders another Muslim he falls under the law of retaliation and must by law be put to death by the next of kin. But if a non-Muslim who dies at the hand of a Muslim has by lifelong habit been a non-Muslim, the penalty of death is not valid. Instead the Muslim murderer must pay a fine and be punished with the lash. … Since Islam regards non-Muslims as on a lower level of belief and conviction, if a Muslim kills a non-Muslim, then his punishment must not be the retaliatory death, since the faith and conviction he possesses is loftier than that of the man slain…Again, the penalties of a non-Muslim guilty of fornication with a Muslim woman are augmented because, in addition to the crime against morality, social duty and religion, he has committed sacrilege, in that he has disgraced a Muslim and thereby cast scorn upon the Muslims in general, and so must be executed. … Islam and its peoples must be above the infidels, and never permit non-Muslims to acquire lordship over them.”Wochenblick , May 18, 2020 (thanks to Medforth Blog ):from the first minute to provide readers with comprehensive and complete information. The 33-year-old Afghan cut the neck of a 32-year-old Red Cross helper. “Out of revenge,” as he has now said. Allegedly, David N. would have ensured that he would no longer be allowed to work in the community’s used clothing collection. His first victim lost the struggle for survival after a few days in the hospital.“Didn’t want to give away the vehicle” Today quoted the alleged double killer as saying that the man did not want to give him his car. That was his death sentence. He somehow found it “not good” that the two people had to die because of him, but “they are to blame for their death”. He has no regrets. He was in daily contact with Allah, and only he could judge him. A. is defended by the “celebrity lawyer” Astrid Wagner, who has represented many Muslim criminals, such as the Graz killer Alen R.Discussions about the term “murderer” Stefan Magnet’s much-watched video from October 21st. It was about lawyer Astrid Wagner’s legal threat to everyone who described her Muslim client as a “murderer”.
