Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (8625)	1/27/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Henry, I agree with you. But you have to admit, this group is kind of schizophrenic on this point. On the one hand, we want all the info we can get and some we shouldn't really have. And then when we get it, it gets plastered all over the internet (instead of a nice quiet phone call) getting everyone nervous, excited and eventually mad when the rumour turns out to be wrong. It doens't take much selling volume to drop the price on this stock so it cannot be overemphasized the damage wrong rumours can have on the stock price. Respectfully, Tom F.

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (8625)	1/27/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: Anne Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

why do you think i likened it to the Titanic..but to act like its not happening..<and this isnt aimed at you> why do you think that on Friday after market close a couple of weeks ago..instinet was trading at much higher numbers..I dont hear a huge amount of rumors on this stock..but the ones i have heard have almost all come to pass..i'm not a major player here..if i hear it.must be pretty well known by many..i just said i had heard it also..is it better to just let it run around in emails? Its reality..rumors,leaks.etc.. not fair , but a reality..

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (8625)	1/27/1998 6:37:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Sorry about that. Suppose I should have stated it was just a rumor. Unfortunately, I've never been able to get any response to all the inquiries I have directed concerning the factual matters (which are material to me as a shareholder) to Jimmy John such as the ones I have posted over the past week. If a constant flow of material information (such as for example, a release concerning J/L Technology option extension) were released on a timely basis, perhaps people ( including myself) would not feel a necessity to grasp at straws as the stock price follows the death spiral. Perhaps there wouldn't even be a death spiral. Generally, I have not found information obtained from investor relations to be all that accurate or timely (JMHO). I don't hear a lot of rumors about the stock but I do hear them from time to time. I'll keep them to myself in the future. JLA

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (8625)	1/27/1998 11:14:00 PM
From: mfgrep	Respond to of 20681

Thanks Henry.....you have just given me reason to believe that there is intelligent life out there.....noone at Naxos could possibly be so stupid as to hype rumors .... could they? Anyway...I think that we should start givin' this thread a rest...we will all probably make more money by using our thread time to practice our occupations. It may also give us a new p.o.v. Sliding into lurk mode...and away from the "rumormill"..... DO YOU THINK THAT ALDOUS HUXLEY WAS REFERRING TO JIMMY JOHN AS BIG BROTHER????