Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ASHTON MINING OF CANADA (ACA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Famularo who wrote (3665)	1/27/1998 7:01:00 PM
From: ddl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7966

Frank, I'm a little disturbed by these K14C results also. How can Ashton be considered a competent reporting Co. when on the one hand they release 422 Micros and 94 macros of which 152 are unbroken crystal micros and 4 are unbroken crystal macros from a drilled sample and then report confirmation of these drilled reports with another drill project saying they are not there!!! Either they should not have reported K14C originally, as it was probably a huge anomaly that could have misled the readers, OR they screwed up on the mini bulk samples as these were not representative of the original soil samples. All past evidence strongly suggested K14C as being better than K14! I'm at a loss here. Did they count drill bits in K14C!! Either way tho, K14A & K14B at 36 & 43 c/100T definately suggest a 1000T bulk should be warranted as their ave C/100T for Merlin, AU is 52.9 c/100T with 35% gem quality. - denis