Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (164749)	5/19/2020 8:03:21 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361820

>>No one has alleged that HCQ has prophylactic properties. Or, that HCQ alone is a treatment for the virus. Or that it will replace a vaccine as Lane suggested. No idea where you got that idea, but on review of your posts I see it slipped into to the conversation. I think, perhaps, you to my comments on mitigation for a lack of vaccine as though I thought it had preventive value. From my posts I believe I have been clear at all times it is a treatment, not a preventive. And so has Zelenski, at least what I’ve seen. HCQ works, is a treatment and a cure for most. But the overwhelming evidence is that Zinc is and essential active agent. HCQ alone has not been shown to cure the virus. With zinc, it has. While taking HCQ with Zinc probably would serve as a prophylactic for a period, that has not been proved but it could still be the subject of an RCT, and ethically so. You give it to a lot of people and test people for antibodies afterward. Then test the result for significant reduction in antibodies. It isn’t a worthy argument, however. It should be self evident that if you have a vaccine you would prefer that over taking HCQ and Zinc routinely. The bottom line here is we need to be making all the HCQ we can. The claim that it is unduly dangerous has been shot down as the liberal media lie it always was.