Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (1231543)	5/20/2020 1:54:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578642

Locogringo, Wharfie is hanging on by a thread, and it's unraveling. No Russian collusion, fake Russian "interference," and three years of wasted investigations for what? To put a black mark on Trump's legacy? Wow. Wharfie still thinks the case against Trump was a "slam dunk" and that the only reason why Trump wasn't charged was because of that rule that sitting presidents supposedly can't be charged with crimes. If what he said were true, the House would have impeached him on the Mueller report alone instead of waiting for that Ukrainian quid pro quo. But they didn't because Mueller explicitly said that he could not find evidence of collusion. That's not a "slam dunk" by any stretch of the imagination, yet Wharfie continues to push that narrative. And yeah, I think he is indeed losing it. Tenchusatsu