SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (116481)5/21/2020 1:06:04 PM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Good Article
or
Trust in science

Haseltine is right, someone needs to review the claims of Moderna and others offering false hope.
As Haseltine points out Fauci is under tremendous pressure from the Whitehouse to change the story.
It is much worse, Fauci needs to make it clear that any vaccine is a long ways away.
That the current administration refuses to accept this is the problem, that is what is undermining science.
It is companies like SNRE annoucing "We have found a cure." when they haven't even had a single trial.
The whole intent of the current administration seems to be be undermining science.
I actually heard the word "unacceptable" used about Fauci's warnings, did you hear that?
The process of developing a safe vaccine takes years.
Who doesn't care, doesn't understand and is trying to go warp speed? (Hint: Not Picard)
Dr. Fauci is failing to point out that Moderna is offering false hope.
Do you think Dr. Fauci is making a lot of money off of offering false hope?
Who is making a mockery of science?
So who is undermining science do you think?
Haseltine's POV certainly isn't an advertisement against Dr. Fauci if that is what you thought it was.

Apparently you do not read what you post.
Donald Doc <tweet> quack is the problem, not Dr. Fauci.



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (116481)5/22/2020 12:11:40 AM
From: S. maltophilia  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
What I don't understand is how mRNA is supposed to get into cells. An injection would just float along in the bloodstream. AFAIK, RNA is is made and stays in the cell; I'm not aware of mRNA receptors, or any evidence that it enters cells, where virions go their thing. Seems like extracellular RNA would evoke an immune response against the RNA, that doesn't belong there.