Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (715668)	5/21/2020 6:58:01 PM
From: Thomas M.	9 Recommendations Recommended By Alan Smithee alanrs Berk Brian Sullivan locogringo and 4 more members Respond to of 794370

Excellent point, made at greater length in this thread: twitter.com 20) The DC Circuit is thus making Judge Sullivan--a lifetime federal judge--publicly and directly explain to them his actions. 21) In short, of all the options available to the DC Circuit for ruling on @SidneyPowell1's writ, the DC Circuit, chose the most extreme, rare, and drastic of them. 22) It has ordered (not requested) Judge Sullivan to personally (and not through appointed amicus) respond and defend his actions to them. Sullivan should be put under full FISA surveillance to make sure he isn't getting help from his Lawfare buddies. Maybe solitary confinement? Tom

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (715668)	5/21/2020 7:03:22 PM
From: D. Long	2 Recommendations Recommended By Alan Smithee Brian Sullivan Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794370

Incredible. I saw a lot of weird and wild stuff clerking in the Civil Appeals section at the Utah Attorney General's office, but I never saw a judge ordered to file a response on any kind of interlocutory appeal. Certainly never saw it in practice to date.