Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Thrustmaster (NASDAQ:TMSR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul W who wrote (1147)	1/27/1998 9:01:00 PM
From: esecurities(tm)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2443

One year ago. Message 728163 Note: Jan 28 1997 fell on a Tuesday. Numbers were released after the closing bell. Also note volume subsequent to last year's Jan 28 release, i.e. check out subsequent posts to the above. TMSR now has a respectable (and influential?) 5 analysts following ThrustMaster: Red Chip (11/23/97 last report), Cruttenden Roth, Black & Company, Wedbush Morgan and Van Kasper, having only recently picked up Wedbush (Oct 6 '97-BUY at ~$16/sh) and Van Kasper (Dec 19 '97-BUY at ~$13/sh). There are presently 3 BUYS out and 1 STRONG BUY on TMSR. TMSR has been uncharacteristically quiet (vs. last year) which also accounted for TMSR stock not moving after their 1/28/97 release given they apparently talked too much (per Red Chip Review). "...Poor TMSR. The Company reports a "blow-out" fourth quarter, beating everyone's expectations (including their own), and the stock barely moves. Of course, much of the quarter's success was already built into the stock price, as management made no secret of the fact that they were having a great quarter..." [emphasis added] &copy 1997 The Red Chip Review 2/25/97 Research Report It is our opinion this is precisely why TMSR effectively appears to be under a gag order and perhaps why the stock has not experienced a similar ramping-up...Apparently, Aanderud does not want to make the same mistake twice?