Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cameron Dorey who wrote (45900)	1/27/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: tom lenaerts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Cameron, I remember defending Gary once ( the volume updates - jeez, this seems to have been a long time ago ). Guess I was wrong there. Well, won't sue him anyway. BTW, just been to the Bgen thread. There was a transcription of the CC over there, brought by the firm itself. Sounds like a good idea, KE...or the good dr.(g) Tom

To: Cameron Dorey who wrote (45900)	1/27/1998 11:24:00 PM
From: Naggrachi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Re: Gary's lawsuit. If anyone deserves to be sued, it should be Dr. Iomega. Period. I asked that guy a couple of times if he worked for the company or the company knew he posted on this thread, however, he always avoided the subject. The guy acted like he was an insider even commenting once that there was "not a chance" that IOM would miss. Pressteck has sued a couple of poster on SI, I definatley think that IOM should take action towards this guy. Put simply, he acted like he was a company representative. Zead