Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (716937)	6/2/2020 12:39:44 PM
From: carranza2	1 Recommendation Recommended By Pogeu Mahone Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794268

Don’t know. The Court of Appeals did not ask for responses and did not set a schedule calling for them. Sullivan’s only arguable point is that he hasn’t decided anything yet. Until he does, mandamus is an unnecessary remedy. It’s not much of a point, IMO, because the filing of the DOJ’s motion to dismiss required him to act promptly without asking for amicus briefs, which are not contemplated under law in criminal cases at the trial court level.