Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (158636)	6/3/2020 4:45:31 AM
From: TobagoJack	2 Recommendations Recommended By dvdw© marcher Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218169

(1) I spend my days here as always, working on this and that, and learning, and doing same w/ the jack (2) am now listening in on yet another webinar (2-i) looks good for globalisation 2.0, but hard-slogging for the planet for 5-12 years, after we got to here by accelerated way, shrinking 10-20 years happenings into 2020. super ultra bullish. (2-ii) globalisation will change, encompassing willing participants and disconnecting unwilling nationalists. (2-iii) there are risks requiring active management. true economic vectors shall enforce whatever must happen shall happen. (2-iv) a club (i.e. G7+3 or 4) for the purpose of containing china is doomed to failure at the get-go, because world cannot exist w/o china cooperation, full stop. none sense to try but sure, try by all means and look suicidal (2-v) china has too many true friends for Cold War 2.0 to even remotely get-go (2-vi) as one team tries to withdraw by ways of automation, cheap capital, universal income transfer, re-shoring, national security, and and and bifurcation, and (2-vii) another team tries to outward bound by ways of automation, cheap capital, global inter-connectivities, far-shoring, national security, and and and within arena where bifurcation or hard-forking happening (2-viii) the world needs and shall recover, but not w/ engaging w/ Cold War (2-ix) G7 ain't it, outdated, and to be replaced, and let's see which one of USA, China, and EU signs up. Some of the rest would follow as long as the club is not exclusionary, the professor's guess. (2-x) India - increasingly significant, but has not proved its role in leading any part of the world. Insular at the moment, and chaotic, and devastated. Maybe 10-20 years to review. (2-xi) No mention of Brazil. (3) Let's see if the professor is correct (4) the egg did not make it

To: Snowshoe who wrote (158636)	6/3/2020 6:56:08 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218169

(1) Am having a hard time believing this spin <<At least nine dead, +4,000 arrested, riots rage in 140 cities as riots rage for the seventh day>> How can? 140 cities? Riots? Meaning burning and looting, as opposed to peaceful demonstrations? (2) Spoke to retired democrat friends in NYC, and the couple said they might vote for the Trump. Am wondering if the poll cited below is valid based on any personal guess? Given that Trump was elected and put into office by a lot of somebodies, and presumably that same percentage of somebodies participated in the poll, would mean folks other than the Trump base are saying yeah to military engaging w/ the protestors / rioters zerohedge.com Poll Finds Clear Majority Of Americans Want Military To Help Police Deal With Riots