Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (38686)	1/27/1998 10:30:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>>I and others wished the company would have imposed a company halt when the price was at $2.5 or higher! Riley G<< Well, of course Riley, I'm sure you did. Preventing shareholder liquidity is serious business and if it has been for the reasons you and others have stated, it would just be another form of illegal manipulation. I can see more lawsuits on the horizon if it can be proven that the company did as you demanded. TC

To: Riley G who wrote (38686)	1/28/1998 12:27:00 AM
From: Garfield	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Could it be that the LONG certificated shareholders have demanded in an email and telephone campain that the stock not trade again UNTIL the money is in the bank or the deal is KILLED by RMIL? I do know that I and many other certificated shareholders are demanding this, as the SEC halt was a blessing to the company as now they can get everything in order for the merger and go through all the trading records for the past 1.5 years and see what's what and who's who! After all the stock stopped trading at $1.0625 and is not going anywhere as we speak. I and others wished the company would have imposed a company halt when the price was at $2.5 or higher! Riley G Thank god the whole stock exchange doesn't follow RMIL's new and improved trading model. I can see it now, all companies release great news and then open trading for a day or two and then shut down trading until they have good news again... You post makes me really wonder about your previous posts. You said in an previous post Quote "That's 3 days from the filing date of the 2-11. They already was a brokerage firm / MM that signed off on the form (yesterday, 1-07-1998.".. Since you told us the forms have already been filed, then it is out of RMIL's hands which invalidates your above post. Please read the following of your posts and explain why they contradict your above statement. Jan 6 - 1:13AM --- 32 hours till trading starts. exchange2000.com Jan 7 - 10:23AM --- A couple more hours, halt has been lifted. exchange2000.com Jan 7 - 11:19AM --- A couple more hours, delay caused by MM's low on inventory exchange2000.com Jan 7 - 12:23PM --- Riley talked to SEC and no reason it shouldn't be trading. exchange2000.com Jan 7 - 12:56PM --- Riley claims SEC didn't inform company about forms needing to be filed (Even though it was stated in the original halt notice), a day or two. exchange2000.com Jan 7 - 1:40PM --- Should be trading on Friday or Monday. exchange2000.com Jan 8 - 2:22PM --- Forms filed on Jan 7. Will be trading by Wednesday at the latest. Expect big news from RMIL before then. exchange2000.com Jan 8 - 3:42PM --- Takes 3 days to process the forms (per the form) exchange2000.com