SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (158751)6/5/2020 11:05:05 AM
From: Follies  Respond to of 218140
 
There seems to be no question that there was no need to keep him prone as he had been subdued by then.
Unless you wanted to prevent him from breathing Corona on you.



To: carranza2 who wrote (158751)6/5/2020 11:34:48 AM
From: Horgad2 Recommendations

Recommended By
marcher
Pogeu Mahone

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218140
 
"there is no evidence of asphyxiation"

The officer was compressing is carotid artery in a type of sleeper hold. The officer was not cutting off his air supply..."just" the oxygen going to his brain. A sleeper hold or a taser shot is non lethal MOST of the time. But the police don't know the medical conditions of the citizens they are encountering or whether they are fit enough to live through sleeper holds or taser shots. And so sometimes people die.

Probably this cop had squeezed many carotids in the past with no deaths. Probably this cop was trained in how to squeeze the carotid. But the question is should the police be using these "almost" non lethal techniques so freely?

Also Floyd was handcuffed and was being beaten while inside the cop car, he moved as far away as he could to avoid the blows, the door was opened such that he fell out and then he was sat on with knee applied to neck. He presented no risk to anyone.

Also if you shove an old lady and she happens to fall down and die, it doesn't matter that she was frail and that most people would not have died from a similar shove. The crime is the same...



To: carranza2 who wrote (158751)6/5/2020 11:43:05 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218140
 
Re <<A skilled trial lawyer who picks the right jury could win the case. If a jury should find them not guilty, the present riots will seem as peaceful as a garden party>>

I cannot breath could have been literal.

it is difficult to overestimate the possibilities.

jury everything.

would not want to be on the jury.

would not want to be at all involved in the case.



To: carranza2 who wrote (158751)6/5/2020 12:12:41 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218140
 
Water is fine
per Grants grantspub.com

Almost Daily Archive Grant's Website

Thursday, June 4, 2020
Shark bites
A gift for the people. Yesterday, the Department of Labor issued guidelines stating that private equity is an appropriate investment for retirement plans such as 401Ks. Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia told reporters that the guidance “helps level the playing field for ordinary investors and is another step by the department to ensure that ordinary people investing for retirement have the opportunities they need.”

The DoL has company in that view. While current rules restrict p.e. to so-called accredited investors (those with $1 million in assets or $200,000 in annual income), the Securities and Exchange Commission last year suggested relaxing those rules in order to “expand investment opportunities while maintaining appropriate investor protections and to promote capital formation.”

The highly illiquid nature of private equity portfolios and discretionary price marks figure prominently in p.e’s appeal. In the first quarter, the buyout portfolios of industry heavyweights KKR & Co., Inc., The Blackstone Group, Inc., Apollo Global Management, Inc. and the Carlyle Group, Inc. were down an average of 15.8%. By comparison, publicly traded single-B-rated companies (usually the highest credit rating of p.e.-backed companies) in the S&P 500 absorbed losses closer to 50%.

While regulators look to open the p.e. door to Joe and Jane Six-Pack, the downside of illiquidity is on display. Institutional Investor reports today that the S.E.C. “is looking into” valuation problems in the bond market during the March asset-price swoon, as difficulty in ascertaining the true clearing value of rarely-traded debt securities led certain credit-themed hedge funds to suspend redemptions.

***

Leveraged loans (i.e., floating-rate, tradable bank debt issued by speculative-grade borrowers), figure prominently in the private equity playbook, as p.e.-backed companies account for over 60% of the loan market according to estimates from S&P’s LCD unit. The asset class thrived in the post financial crisis epoch, growing at a 10.2% compound annual rate in the nine years through December, compared to 3.7% growth for junk bonds. Last week, a New York judge dismissed an investor lawsuit claiming that a loan syndicated by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. should be officially designated as “securities,” and subject to the same disclosure rules as stocks and bonds.

In issuing his opinion, Federal District Judge Paul G. Gardephe cited the presumptively informed loan market investor: “It would have been reasonable for these sophisticated institutional buyers to believe that they were lending money, with all of the risks that may entail, and without the disclosure and other protections associated with the issuance of securities.” Currently, the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Price Index trades at 90 cents on the dollar, up from the March lows of 76 cents, but well off the recent highs of 97.3 in January, prior to the pandemic and lockdown.

Collateralized loan obligations, or packaged and securitized collections of leveraged loans, present their own potential for broader complication. On Tuesday, the Bank of Japan and the Japanese Financial Services Agency regulator warned that local institutions should pay heed to risks within CLOs, which account for roughly half of the leveraged loan universe. With banks and investors in Japan forced to reach for yield, CLOs have become investment de rigueur: Japan’s five largest banks held a combined $126 billion in CLOs as of March 31, largely concentrated at the triple-A level.

Trouble is afoot down the CLO credit spectrum. Yesterday, Moody’s added 241 CLO securities to its watchlist for potential downgrade, joining 859 such tranches which have been under review since April. Together, the watch-listed securities now account for roughly 25% of all outstanding CLO notes, and, while none of those tranches is rated triple-A, eight are rated double-A and 51 are rated at single-A.

Risks in the underlying loans themselves are even more pronounced, if the actions of rating agencies are any guide. Thus, the rolling three-month ratio of downgrades to upgrades within the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index reached an eye-popping 43 to 1 at the end of May, LCD reported yesterday. Over the last 12 months, the downgrade-to-upgrade ratio stood at 8.5 times, easily topping the 5.3 times peak in 2009.

Come on in, mom and pop. The water’s fine.


QE progress report
Lucky sevens: Reserve Bank credit (or the Fed’s sum total of interest-bearing assets) rose to $7.1 trillion this week, up $42 billion from a week ago. While down from a $137 billion sequential increase in last week’s reading, the latest move was enough to nudge the three-month annualized growth rate to 700% from 655% on May 27. Relative to a year ago, Reserve Bank credit is up 82%.
Recap June 4
Bear steepening action in Treasurys continues apace, as the 10- and 30-year yields jumped to 0.82% and 1.63%, respectively, with each at their highest since March. Stocks took a pause after a feverish recent run, as the S&P 500 finished modestly in the red, while gold climbed back to $1,716 an ounce and WTI crude held at $37 a barrel. The VIX ticked to 25.5, its third straight decline.

- Philip Grant



To: carranza2 who wrote (158751)6/6/2020 4:38:00 PM
From: gg cox1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218140
 
Message 32773096



To: carranza2 who wrote (158751)6/8/2020 12:15:22 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 218140
 
Martin noted

ask-socrates.com

Blog

The Pattern is the Same



Many have written in to ask that simply because of the strength of the rally that this means the low is in place and the recovery is now confirmed. Such opinion has been the doom of traders for centuries. People make judgments solely based upon the percent of the rally and that is no way to determine a market forecast. The Dow, in case you may not look at history, tested the 1,000 level three times and fell and only on the fourth time did it finally breakout.

The 1966 high was 1001.11 and the 1968 high was 994.65. If we just look at the 1966 rally which was the inflationary boom and the bust in mutual funds, the rally into 1968 had everyone convinced all was well. But 1968 was the first crack in Bretton Woods when they began the two-tier gold system and gold began to trade in London. From there, the market crashed into 1970 with the dollar rallying to record highs and gold fell below $35 for the first time. Then in 1971 was the Monetary Crisis Cycle and that is when Bretton Woods collapsed on August 15th. This demonstrates that the fundamentals were not just wrong, but that they caused everyone to be on the wrong side every single time to the extreme.

This is what we are facing with the coming Monetary Crisis Cycle once again. It hit in 1971 and here we are approaching a critical point and once more the foolish want to rush in and assume the rally is real simply because of the percentage move. This will be interesting and the Dow is what we need to watch for that can make a new low just as you see here in 1970.

Just follow the reversals and the arrays and be objective - dismiss all emotional judgment if you care to survive.