Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Whitegold Resources Corp (WGO) Asset Rich, by any measure -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stak who wrote (255)	1/28/1998 2:06:00 PM
From: Mikey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 378

I think they were a no-show because they were "lying low." I went by their office yesterday and everything looks good. They mentioned possible near-term newsletter appearance. Something is afoot, because Yorkton is snatching up everything today. 10 trades so far. Yorkton was the buyer on 9 of them. 5000 share blocks, 9000 share blocks...36,100 volume and they account for buying 36000 of it. Not a time for anyone to be selling, in my opinion. I asked about the guy exercising options and they said it was one of the directors paying the bills, as someone posted earlier. Yorkton crossed 2000 at 0.58 and has bought everything offered at 0.65 and 0.66 since then. Looks like we're FINALLY going to go somewhere. M.

To: stak who wrote (255)	1/28/1998 6:29:00 PM
From: Francis R. Biscan Jr.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 378

>>the vancouver mining conference had no whitegold representation. i would have thought that they'd have a booth again as they did last yeat. especially in light of the fact that the feasibility study should make it's appearance(hopefully) very soon. it seems the least they could do. does anyone know why they were a no-show? << I believe it was mostly a money thing. When principals are selling their stock to fund the treasury, even when a very positive feasibility is due out soon, there is not extra money for a booth. I do agree that it would have been timely with the report due out soon. Maybe they will have money for the next one. It will be interesting to review the full report when it is done. It will answer many unknowns, at this point, and probably raise a few new questions also. Rich