Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JMAR Technologies(JMAR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Candle stick who wrote (4877)	1/28/1998 12:14:00 AM
From: Bilberry	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9695

Candle Stick, your points are well taken. Of course its a crapshoot whether the warrants are extended or not. My new thinking is that JMAR would be better off getting $12.6 million earlier to expand the new product lines faster. JMAR has so much on its plate, that I find it hard to believe that more money now would not make it so that earnings in 1998 and 1999 and beyond would not benefit far more than the dilution. The DARPA funds only cover XRL, not the products and spinoffs that come from it. As you said, this depends on JMAR getting high enough in price. If JMAR performs as we expect, I don't think the warrants will keep JMAR down. Lots of companies have warrants and move well past the strike prices. JMAR almost broke $5 until the swiss shorting and korean problems. JMAR was above the warrant price. JMAR can modify the warrant this time around to make it easier to call the warrants, and other adjustments. We will just have to see how things work out. Either way, we will all do very well. So don't fret regardless of the decision. This is not a win/lose type of thing. A decision in either direction has its advantages and disadvantages. I am a shareholder and am happy either way. --Bilberry