SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: locogringo who wrote (1236859)6/6/2020 9:30:16 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577859
 
Study: Hydroxychloroquine had no benefit for hospitalized Covid-19 patients, possibly closing door to use of drug

By Matthew Herper @matthewherper
Stat news
June 5, 2020

A major clinical trial showed the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine had no benefit for patients hospitalized with Covid-19, likely closing the door to the use of the highly publicized medicine in the sickest patients — a use for which it was widely prescribed as the pandemic hit the U.S.

The results come from a study called RECOVERY, funded by the U.K. government, that sought to randomly assign large numbers of patients to multiple potential treatments in the country’s National Health Service. The goal was to rapidly get answers as to what worked and what didn’t.

“Today’s preliminary results from the RECOVERY trial are quite clear – hydroxychloroquine does not reduce the risk of death among hospitalized patients with this new disease,” University of Oxford epidemiologist Martin Landray, one of the study’s leaders, said in a statement. “This result should change medical practice worldwide and demonstrates the importance of large, randomized trials to inform decisions about both the efficacy and the safety of treatments.”

A total of 1,542 received hydroxychloroquine, and 3,132 received usual care. After 28 days of treatment, 25.7% of those on hydroxychloroquine and 23.5% of those received usual care had died, meaning those on hydroxychloroquine were 11% more likely to die. That difference was not statistically significant.

There was “no beneficial effect” on how long patients stayed in the hospital, or on other outcomes.

The results were shared via a press release, which the study’s lead authors shared on Twitter. They have not been peer-reviewed or published in a medical journal. The researchers said that full results would be shared as soon as possible.

Still, experts said even the top-line results showed they were meaningful.

“This is a hugely important finding that will likely end use of the drug in hospitalized Covid patients, given the other existing data as well,” said Walid Gellad, director of the Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing at the University of Pittsburgh. Gellad said that he is curious to see the results of other ongoing studies, and that it is still an open question whether the medicine might work earlier in the disease. “We need real answers there as well,” he said.

Robert Califf, the former Food and Drug Administration commissioner and Alphabet employee, tweeted that the study “essentially rules out benefit of [hydroxychloroquine] in critically ill hospitalized patients.” He wrote that the results showed “no benefit; no major risk.”

In addition to being used for malaria, hydroxychloroquine is prescribed to treat conditions including rheumatoid arthritis and lupus. But it was known to increase the risk of arrhythmias.

The FDA still authorized emergency use of the drug in hospitalized patients in March, citing the possible safety issues.

Concerns were heightened by a May 22 study in British medical journal the Lancet. That study, which claimed to use a database from hundreds of hospitals around the world, seemed to indicate that treatment with hydroxychloroquine increased the death rate and the rate of arrhythmias.

But on Thursday, the Lancet retracted that study at the request of the authors after widespread questions about the database the study used and the company, Surgisphere, that had provided it. The authors not associated with Surgisphere had asked for the data to be audited, and Surgisphere refused. As such, they wrote, “we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.”

On Wednesday, another group of researchers released results from another randomized study, testing whether giving people hydroxychloroquine shortly after they have been exposed to someone with Covid-19 could prevent disease transmission. That study also showed no benefit, thought some researchers, including Gellad and Califf, say some effect is still possible.

“It could still have an effect given very early in disease, although less and less likely every day that passes,” Gellad said.

There are dozens of studies ongoing with hydroxychloroquine, more than for any other potential Covid-19 treatment, including studies that combine it with antibiotics such as azithromycin or doxycycline. But the results appear to show the benefit of putting resources into testing medicines in large randomized trials, the medical gold standard, during a pandemic.

The RECOVERY trial represented an early and large effort at such studies, testing not only hydroxychloroquine but also a pair of HIV drugs, lopinavir and ritonavir, and the steroid dexamethasone. The study was later expanded to also test using plasma from recovered patients to treat those who are still ill.

statnews.com



To: locogringo who wrote (1236859)6/6/2020 9:37:13 AM
From: Land Shark1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pocotrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577859
 
Fake and Dr Smith has a conflict of interest



To: locogringo who wrote (1236859)6/6/2020 9:57:02 AM
From: bruwin1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Respond to of 1577859
 
Yes, and what the Extreme Leftists were SCREECHING ABOUT has now been PROVEN TO BE BULLSH*T to quote yet ANOTHER SOURCE --->



And you may recall, in May 2020, that it didn't take long for THE SYCOPHANTIC, LEFTIST, DEMOCRATIC-PARTY-BUM-LICKING MSM, e.g. The Washington Post, to come out WITH THIS VILE GARBAGE, FOR ONE REASON, AND FOR ONE TREASON ONLY, TO "POINT A FINGER AT PRESIDENT DONALD JOHN TRUMP", THE DULY ELECTED 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE USA, WHETHER THE LEFTISTS LIKED IT OR NOT ------>




To: locogringo who wrote (1236859)6/6/2020 4:58:21 PM
From: Taro2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577859
 
One just has to wonder, how this bogus report could pass all the stringent filters at The Lancet to make it all way into a real issue of theirs! Follow the money, most likely big money, I would say ...
I'd at least expect some people to get fired at The Lancet or at least 'relocated'. We'll see!