SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 5G Wireless and the Internet of Things (IoT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric L who wrote (29)6/7/2020 11:56:42 AM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 47
 
Mobile 5G Technology Leadership 2019 Part 1: Tech Innovations And Standards

>> Who Is 'Really' Leading In Mobile 5G, Part 1: Tech Innovations And Standards

Patrick Moorhead
Anshel Sag
May 15, 2019

forbes.com

For the first part of this series, the focus is on mobile 5G leadership in technology innovation and standards development.

For this, we must define what we consider a leadership position for mobile 5G and how we define that in terms of technology innovation and standards development. Many companies use different metrics to define success in this area, but ultimately the main metrics of success that we believe to be relevant to mobile 5G leadership are how many innovations get adopted into the 3GPP specification and ETSI’s IMT-2020 standard and whether these standards ultimately solve a problem that existed before its creation.

Number of contributions a flawed approach (quality, not quantity)

The industry works together to create these wireless standards and specifications which are made up of disclosed Standard Essential Patents (SEP) that are relevant to 5G for the ETSI standard. This process is continuing from the initial 3GPP Rel. 15 spec of 5G NR and is ongoing into the upcoming Rel. 16 version of the spec. Some firms are counting these SEPs and misguidedly using them as a metric for success in 5G. Not all these SEPs are necessarily created equally, with companies like Qualcomm’s SEPs having a higher quality and making up a bigger part of the core of the 5G spec than others. Patent counting or just filing patents for the sake of getting that number up has been a strategy employed by some vendors, like Huawei. The practice of patent counting has been employed before by Huawei Technologies in the Linux Foundation and appear to be repeating the same strategy to show perceived leadership with 3GPP. Patent and contribution counting is a flawed way to measure the degree of contribution and is covered here in a recent article in "IAM", recognized as a leading IP business media outlet.

Don't confuse "research" and "development"

Many in the 5G industry spend considerable amounts of money on R&D, but it is important to not confuse the difference between research and development and how few have real research. Everyone uses development to build products off the research that is done, but very few have deep research organizations that are breaking new ground and paving the way for the industry. This is a key metric for what kinds of companies are truly leading the industry in innovation and standards development. Companies that are doing lots of research are trying to solve problems that the rest of the industry is most likely to encounter, a good analogy is that these companies are the ice breaker ships for the entire fleet.

Huawei Technologies has become a major player here but we believe Qualcomm is the undisputed leader in this space as they have been leading in 3G, 4G and 5G and the company is continuing to invest heavily in R&D to ensure that leadership continues all the way through 5G and eventually to 6G.

5G release 15

Qualcomm was one of the 3GPP members has contributed greatly to where 5G is today, including pushing for the phase 1 and phase 2 releases of the 5G NR standard that are coming with Release 15 which include NSA (non-standalone) and SA (standalone) 5G networks. This is important because Qualcomm pushed for the two-phase approach which brought us 5G NR a year earlier (2019) rather than the originally planned 2020 (hence why the global standard is called IMT-2020). Qualcomm has also had other major contributions that have shaped the 5G standard’s direction and accelerated development for the whole industry, solving problems.

Release 15 of the 3GPP specification was very academic and crucial to establishing the foundations for 5G that will carry on through the technology for the next decade and beyond. 3GPP’s Release 16 is all about the fundamentals of applying the ideals of release 15 into the new industries that 5G is trying to address and bring into cellular connectivity.

Release 16 is about adding a small number of new capabilities to meet the requirements of those new industries while maintaining a common platform, the 5G network. We already saw this happen to a degree in Release 15 with C-V2X, which was originally introduced in Release 14 as part of 4G LTE incorporating C-V2X into 5G. This was also enabled thanks to Qualcomm’s creation of the device to device feature within 4G LTE which ultimately allowed for C-V2X and the creation of first responder networks like AT&T’s FirstNet.

5G release 16

One new industry that has a big area of focus for 3GPP Release 16 is Industrial IoT. In the area of industrial IoT, private 5G networks are a big lure for factory owners, but operators who have been part of the creation of the standard don’t want to have issues with these private networks, so Qualcomm is helping them bridge the gap between them to find solutions that satisfy both parties. Qualcomm has been a pioneer in enabling the use of unlicensed spectrum for 4G LTE (LAA), which is partly what has enabled some of the crazy LTE speeds you may have been noticing recently. With 5G, however, they’ve found a way to separate the licensed and unlicensed carriers so that a licensed anchor isn’t required to enable unlicensed access. These networks will most likely operate on the 60 GHz unlicensed band, much like LAA operates on 5 GHz today, but there’s also the possibility it may operate on other frequencies like 6 GHz and 95 GHz.

Other contributors to 3GPP’s 5G NR standard like Huawei have also been instrumental in the establishment of the standard. Huawei’s developments in polar codes found their way into the coding scheme for the control channels of 5G NR. However, this contribution to the standard while relevant does not amount to the same amount of work that Qualcomm has produced to create solutions for 5G.

3GPP organization is made up of many different companies, including operators, infrastructure vendors, and smartphone OEMs, many of these companies make small contributions together that make up the whole of the standard. Very few of these companies can solve some of these problems on their own and it is generally the experts like Huawei and Qualcomm that are able to solve major wireless problems. The amount of contributions themselves is not relevant, but rather their overall impact on the standard and whether they are adopted by the industry.

These innovations are not the end, there are many things being discussed as part of 3GPP Release 16 that include incorporating broadcast technologies into 5G to broaden the capabilities of operators and seamlessly deliver TV services to consumers with richer content and interactivity. Release 16 is still not complete yet, so it remains to be seen exactly what makes it into Release 16 or what will end up in 17. Nevertheless, Qualcomm is investing billions of dollars into 5G R&D every year, the company spent north of $5.6 billion last year and the company was fighting off hostile takeovers and assaults on their fundamental business model. When the company cut its budgets to appease investors, R&D was the only part of the company that didn’t see significant budgetary or staffing cuts. They take their role as an innovator and industry leader very seriously and understand what could happen to the entire wireless industry if they were to cut back on R&D. Because of these facts, there’s no doubt in my mind that Qualcomm is the leader in 5G innovation and standard settings.

The next part of this series will cover chipset leadership in 5G and see exactly what the status of the industry is there.

Disclosure: Moor Insights & Strategy, like all research and analyst firms, provides or has provided paid research, analysis, advising, or consulting to many high-tech companies in the industry, including Advanced Micro Devices, Apstra, ARM Holdings, Bitfusion, Cisco Systems, Dell EMC, Diablo Technologies, Echelon, Ericcson, Frame, Gen Z Consortium, Glue Networks, GlobalFoundries, Google (Nest), HP Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Huawei Technologies, IBM, Jabil Circuit, Intel, Interdigital, Konica Minolta, Lenovo, Linux Foundation, MACOM (Applied Micro), MapBox, Mavenir, Mesosphere, Microsoft, National Instruments, NOKIA (Alcatel Lucent), Nortek, NVIDIA, ONUG, OpenStack Foundation, Peraso, Portworx, Protequus, Pure Storage, Qualcomm, Rackspace, Rambus, Red Hat, Samsung Technologies, Silver Peak, SONY, Springpath, Sprint, Stratus Technologies, TensTorrent, Tobii Technology, Synaptics, Verizon Communications, Vidyo, Wellsmith, Xilinx, Zebra, which may be cited in this article. <<

# # #

- Eric L. -



To: Eric L who wrote (29)6/7/2020 1:11:55 PM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 47
 
Mobile 5G Technology Leadership 2019 Part 2: 5G Mobile Chipsets ...

>> Who Is 'Really' Leading In Mobile 5G, Part 2: 5G Mobile Chipsets

Patrick Moorhead
Anshel Sag
Jun 12, 2019



forbes.com

Two weeks ago, we kicked off our 5G leadership series here, starting with 5G technology innovations and standards. As we continue the series, we wanted to move on to 5G chipsets, which we define as chipsets that go into 5G consumer mobile devices versus, let’s say, IoT or IIoT devices. There is also another aspect of 5G that could be considered “chipsets,” which go into 5G infrastructure, but we will cover those in the infrastructure portion of this series, which will come later since it is many of the same players.

When it comes to 5G mobile chipsets, the market has become considerably more consolidated since the beginning of the 4G days with many players exiting the market or selling off their divisions due to high R&D costs and low returns. Lots of claims of leadership in 5G mobile chipsets have been made in the past, but we define leadership in the space as one that is first and foremost defined by commercial availability and chipset capabilities. There have been many players in the space that have announced chipsets months in advance to only deliver those chipsets later, commercially, than their competitors.

The players

As mentioned earlier, while there are few players in the mobile chipset space, it is still a highly dynamic and competitive market with some building modems, some building RF-Front-end components, and some players in the space doing both to better resolve the increasing complexity of cellular networks and tighten integration and improve time to market.

Much of the industry is split between those that can do mmWave and those that cannot. This will be a key variable to consider as mmWave is considerably more difficult to deliver, and very few players can do mmWave commercially. However, the benefits to capacity and bandwidth delivered by mmWave will eventually make it an inevitability everywhere that dense deployments are needed.

The biggest market for 5G modems right now is in Sub-6GHz for a few reasons: many countries have yet to free up mmWave spectrum; mmWave is harder to do in terms of RF and device design; and lastly, mmWave doesn’t cover as wide of an area due to the higher frequencies. In the modem space, we have players that include the following companies with announced 5G modems. I will note that the US has been the only region able to deploy both mmWave and Sub6, for now.

Huawei Technologies (HiSilicon)

Huawei’s 5G modem portfolio is branded “Balong.” The company refers to the Balong “platform,” which it says includes both modem and RF ICs. It is unclear as to Huawei’s complete RFFE solution. However, the modems themselves are also called “Balong,” and the company has announced that its Balong 5000 series modem will be shipping commercially this year in devices. Clear as mud at this point.

Huawei says the Balong 5000 is a 7nm, multi-mode 5G modem with support for both standalone and non-standalone networks. The first announced product to carry it was originally the Mate X foldable device which the company says is expected to be available sometime this summer. However, Huawei later announced a Mate 20X 5G which is a version of last year’s Mate 20 Pro paired with a Balong 5000 modem. The Balong 5000 is currently not yet commercially available in any devices, as the Huawei Mate 20X 5G has been pulled by all 5G operators that recently launched networks in Europe. We checked but couldn’t find a single operator still carrying Huawei’s 5G devices, that originally announced its intention to offer them. Huawei claims to also be a leader in 5G mmWave, but none of its devices shown thus far appear to be supporting mmWave, and the company has sent out mixed messages regarding mmWave support.

At MWC, the company glossed over mmWave in its presentation of 5G support for the Mate X, but did claim mmWave speeds; upon requesting further information, we were informed that mmWave is supported by the Balong 5000, but requires implementation by the devices group, which is likely to be in the 2H of 2019. Huawei’s commercial support for mmWave appears to be predicated on the Huawei device group rather than HiSilicon’s modem’s capabilities. However, the company has yet to show a working mmWave prototype of the MateX, or any device, and its website for the Mate X does not state support for any mmWave bands.

Since Huawei isn’t in the business of building their own RF-front-end components, they must source components from suppliers like Qorvo and Skyworks to build their RF-front-ends. This means that there might not be as tight of an integration of components compared to a mostly in-house solution.

MediaTek Inc.

MediaTek has traditionally been more of a lower-priced follower-challenger than a leader in cellular modems. However, it did announce around the same time as Intel and Huawei, that it would have a mobile-ready 5G modem.

MediaTek’s 5G modem, called the Helio M70, is the company’s first 5G modem, which it claims is a 5G multi-mode modem built on TSMC’s 7nm process and supports both standalone and non-standalone networks. Like Qualcomm and Huawei, it supports the 5G NR spec's EN-DC feature, which enables 4G and 5G dual connectivity (and aggregating across both networks) to attain even higher speeds. The catch with MediaTek’s 5G modem is that it isn’t claiming mmWave support, even though that might be a possibility down the road with future modems. Without an appropriate mmWave front-end partner, there isn’t much of a chance for MediaTek to support mmWave. The company believes that the lack of mmWave support is okay because its customers are using this modem to ship devices predominantly to Sub-6GHz operators. Its claimed Sub-6GHz speeds are about on par with what are expected to be the peak speeds of first-generation 5G modems. Similar to Huawei, MediaTek also doesn’t produce its own RF-front-end components so it is dependent on partners to integrate their modems into OEM designs.

The company also announced that it would be integrating the M70 modem into its upcoming 7nm SoC with ARM’s latest Cortex-A77 and Mali-G77 cores in early 2020. MediaTek says that the M70 has been available since December of last year, but it expects to ship in the second half of 2019, which should mean sometime in the next two quarters.

Intel Corp.

Intel is a curious case because the company had been fighting hard to compete with the rest of the industry, as a relatively new re-entrant to cellular in 4G after its acquisition of Infineon’s modem business. Intel has had a difficult history with mobility and smartphones in general and was having a hard time finding any customers for its 4G modems until it managed to capture Apple as a customer.

Intel originally announced that its first commercial 5G modem would be the XMM 8060, following its Gold Ridge prototype modem. However, in late 2018 Intel decided that the XMM 8060 would no longer ship as a commercial modem but would instead be used as a development platform. That decision was paired with the announcement of the XMM 8160, which is the company’s latest 5G modem, capable of both Sub-6GHz and mmWave connectivity and both SA and NSA networks. The XMM 8160 is supposed to be built using Intel’s 10nm process node and was supposed to ship in the second half of 2019, with availability in devices in 2020.

More recently, at MWC 2019, the company was still showing demos of its 5G modem capabilities using an emulation box designed to simulate the modem’s capabilities for testing and qualification until an ASIC was available. However, Intel did announce that it finally had its own mmWave RF IC for building a few of the analog support chips for the mmWave front-end, with a late 2020 or early 2021 target.

Following MWC, the company announced that it would no longer pursue a 5G smartphone modem business after its lead customer, Apple, signed an agreement with competitor Qualcomm to supply it with 5G modems and IP for six years. This has put all of Intel’s efforts in 5G modems into question as to its development in 5G PCs, and automotive was leveraged by most of the 5G smartphone work.

The company says it is currently evaluating the future of its entire 5G modem business, but this business is one of scale, and to remain in it, would need to justify volumes across the PC plus IoT industry. The only other thing that could be a possibility would be to integrate 5G into more future PCs and IoT, but that is still probably a year away or longer for Intel and seems hard to justify the future R&D. At this point, Intel’s 5G modem business is what I would consider being in limbo as the status is unknown, but it does technically have a product.

Qualcomm

Qualcomm’s (integrated and discrete) modem business, is at the core of what the company is and has been, with everything else being complementary to its modem technology. Qualcomm has been making modems since CDMA, and it effectively created that standard, so it has a long history with cellular communications and has been pivotal in developing the 3GPP 5G standard. As such, it’s no surprise that Qualcomm not only announced the first 5G modem, its Snapdragon X50 chip but also already shipped the first 5G modems in commercial devices as well.

The X50 is not a multi-mode 5G chip, so it must be paired with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 4G SoC platform and was primarily designed for early NSA and Sub-6GHz or mmWave 5G network deployments. As such, this modem didn’t have support for the same features that the second-generation Snapdragon X55 has, which includes SA and NSA network support for mmWave and Sub-6GHz frequencies.

Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X55 adds support for 4G/5G spectrum sharing addition to both types of spectrum. The Snapdragon X55 also adds FDD and SA 5G modes in addition to NSA and TDD which were supported in the X50. In the X55, Qualcomm also doubled the supported bandwidth in Sub-6GHz to 200 MHz from 100 MHz, which allows for much faster peak speeds. Qualcomm claims a peak speed of 7 Gbps down and 3 Gbps up with the X55. Peak speeds are a nice number to claim, as others have as well, but ultimately device performance is what matters the most, which is generally significantly lower. However, it is worth mentioning that it was recently reported that a device with Qualcomm’s first-generation X50 modem did achieve 2 Gbps download speeds in a real network environment and Qualcomm demonstrated 4.5+ Gbps at MWC. I wrote about that here. The Snapdragon X55 modem is already shipping to customers and is expected in devices by the end of the year.

Finally, on the modem side, Qualcomm also pre-announced that the company would be integrating a 5G modem into an SoC in early 2020, which is around the same timeframe as MediaTek claimed.

In addition to having launched two generations of 5G modems, Qualcomm has also launched two generations of 5G mmWave RF front-end modules. The second generation of these modules, the QTM525, is so small that it could be integrated into virtually any kind of device, which further helps to improve the adoption of mmWave 5G, especially when you think about signal blocking. It seems that most 5G mmWave solutions will require at least two of these mmWave 5G modules, so the smaller they are, the better chances are that the device designers will be able to integrate these easily into the designs of smartphones and tablets. The new QTM525 also adds support for more bands of mmWave including 24 GHz to 27 GHz, which is in addition to the already supported 28 GHz and 39 GHz bands.

Qualcomm also makes RF-front-end PA and diversity modules for 5G, which are designed to address 5G and 4G connectivity in the Sub-6GHz bands for both low-band and mid-band spectrum. Qualcomm is pairing its PA modules with its QET6100 envelope tracker to help reduce power consumption and improve upload performance in 5G. With the transition from 4G to 5G, most RF components and ET have to be upgraded or improved upon, which is why new diversity modules must be created for Sub-6GHz 5G as well.

Samsung

Samsung has been in the modem business for quite some time, especially since it has been building its modems into Samsung phones for a long time. Like Huawei, Samsung’s modems are built in-house and are only used in its handsets. Also, like Huawei, Samsung has a considerable network infrastructure business, so it is also involved in 5G in more than one way.

We’ll get into its infrastructure business in another installment of this series, but in this one, we’ll focus on Samsung’s Exynos Modem 5100. Exynos is the brand for Samsung’s in-house SoCs, and its modems also bear the same branding, similarly to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon branding. Like Qualcomm’s, Samsung’s modem is both Sub-6GHz capable as well as mmWave, and supports LTE as well as 5G; it is paired with Samsung’s own RF IC for mmWave. Exynos 5100 refers to the entire platform, which includes the modem, RF, ET (envelop tracking) and power management IC. Samsung is building the Exynos Modem 5100 on a 10nm process node.

Samsung’s Exynos 5100 chipset can be found in certain geographies in its new Galaxy S10 5G. However, it is worth noting that not all versions of the Galaxy S10 5G will are shipping with Samsung’s Exynos chipset, as those in the US are shipping with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chip and mmWave modules. This is because Samsung usually ships Qualcomm chips in certain markets and Samsung chips in others.

Unisoc

Unisoc is one of the newest players in the 5G space, but not in modems. Unisoc was formerly branded Spreadtrum and is the last of the major modem suppliers that offer a 5G modem. Unisoc announced its first 5G modem, the IVY510, along with its 5G technology platform named MAKALU back in late-February at MWC 2019. This modem does not target the leading 7nm process node as others have but instead is built using TSMC’s 12nm process, probably to save cost. The modem itself is multi-mode, supporting 2G to 5G, and Sub-6 GHz bandwidths up to 100 MHz. The IVY510 will support both standalone and non-standalone 5G networks, like other modems out there, but there’s no mention of mmWave in any of their publicly available materials. Because Unisoc is generally a supplier to Chinese white label OEMs, cost is extremely important; supporting mmWave adds cost to a device, and most likely isn’t yet a necessary feature in markets that matter to Unisoc’s OEMs.

Skyworks Solutions Inc

While Skyworks is not a modem supplier, it does supply many smartphone OEMs with RF-front-end solutions for cellular connectivity. The company supplies many of the components that sit between the modem and the network, including filters, amplifiers, and other RF front-end components.

Skyworks has named its line of 5G products Sky5, which includes power amplifiers, filters, and some modules that integrate them. Modules are becoming increasingly important due to the complexity resulting from a large number of 5G bands to be supported for both Sub-6GHz and mmWave. However, SkyWorks’ solutions are only for Sub-6GHz 5G solutions for the foreseeable future, until the company creates an RF IC or module for mmWave. All of the players that have mmWave solutions are delivering the front-end as complete modules, so I suspect that we might see something like that from Skyworks eventually.

Qorvo Inc

Qorvo is in a very similar situation as SkyWorks; in fact, the company is Skyworks’ biggest competitor, and the two companies collectively make up a significant chunk of the world’s RF-Front-end chipsets and components. Qorvo does not make modems either, nor does it manufacture handsets like some others mentioned, but it does help its OEM partners to integrate its components in a way that optimizes radio performance. Also, like SkyWorks, most of Qorvo’s mobile 5G front-end solutions are designed for Sub-6GHz 5G smartphones and other devices.

Qorvo does, however, have some mmWave radio solutions for infrastructure, but that doesn’t appear to influence its mobile division. From my experience, companies that are the furthest ahead in mmWave were already experimenting with it when they built 60 GHz Wi-Fi solutions and worked through some of the challenges with mmWave then.

So, who’s the leader in mobile 5G chipsets in the end?

This is an easy call. If you look at which company has the most products out in the market and the one with the most complete 5G mobile solutions, it’s pretty much no contest.

Qualcomm has two generations of 5G modems shipping to customers and already has devices with their first-generation in the market. We’ll cover 5G devices in more depth in the next phase of this leadership series, but Qualcomm is currently the first one to ship a 5G modem and is already shipping their second generation of modems to customers. It also has both Sub-6GHz and mmWave commercially, which shows leadership due to solving the very difficult problems of mmWave. It also has numerous 5G front-end products in addition to its 5G modems, which collectively gives it the right to claim undisputed 5G leadership in mobile chipsets. <<

# # #

- Eric L. -



To: Eric L who wrote (29)6/7/2020 10:26:19 PM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 47
 
Mobile 5G Technology Leadership 2019 Part 3: 5G Mobile Handsets

>> Who Is 'Really' Leading In Mobile 5G, Part 3: Mobile Handsets

Patrick Moorhead
Anshel Sag
June 27, 2019

forbes.com

Unless you are living under a rock, you know 5G is the next generation of mobile networks and will be the connectivity backbone most devices in the future. Because of the crucial nature of 5G and how it will help shape the next decade, many companies are finding ways to latch onto 5G and even claim leadership in 5G. Many articles and analysis on 5G leadership we have read have been one dimensional and shallow, and we decided to research and write this series.

This article makes up Part 3 of our series, focusing on 5G handset leadership as pretty much nearly all 5G devices out today are smartphones, with a few exceptions. In Part 1, we covered 5G intellectual property and patent leadership, which is difficult because most of the 3GPP contributions are not public. In Part 2, we covered 5G chipsets and the status of all the different players in the space. In Part 3 analysis, we will focus on the handsets and the manufacturers that build devices using the currently available chipsets and where those devices are used.

Defining 5G handset leadership

When it comes to handset leadership in 5G, our definition is dependent on a few factors. The first factor is whether that manufacturer is shipping a device or has announced one. Once that is established, the number of handsets shipping and the number of carriers supported will be considered. Support for Sub-6GHz and mmWave is also a factor because mmWave is harder to do in a mobile device and requires more experience and engineering.

If an OEM isn’t currently shipping a device, then leadership will be measured by public demonstrations of 5G and or the announcement dates of support for 5G in its devices. If a manufacturer does not have any public dates or demonstrations, then public rumors are all that can be measured, and we consider that to be in the last category. The categories we will be using for this will be leaders, close followers, late followers, and laggards.

5G Handset “Leaders.”

Samsung

It’s easy to show that Samsung has the 5G smartphone manufacturer lead among the rest of the industry. It has successfully shipped 5G phones with multiple carriers in multiple geographies on multiple 5G bands, including mmWave and Sub-6GHz.

Currently, the Galaxy S10 5G is Samsung’s primary 5G device for global operators shipping in Australia, Korea, Switzerland, the UK, and the US. Samsung worked with multiple operators as well, including Telstra in Australia, which is an exclusive agreement and has been shown to exceed speeds of 1.2 Gbps+. In Korea, Samsung’s Galaxy S10 5G is available on SK Telecom, Korea Telecom and LG UPlus with speeds up to 2.6 Gbps as reported by SK Telecom. In Switzerland, Sunrise and Swisscom both offer the Galaxy S10 5G and have service available as well. In the UK, the Galaxy S10 5G is available on both EE and Vodafone and offering 5G over Sub-6GHz spectrum much like Swiss carriers. The reason for Samsung selling devices in Switzerland and the UK with only Sub-6GHz spectrum is because the spectrum first made available in Europe has predominantly been Sub-6GHz spectrum. Last but certainly not least are the US operators which Samsung has accomplished a clean sweep with all four major operators; AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon that offer versions of the Galaxy S10 5G, whether it be Sub-6Ghz or mmWave. My colleague, Anshel Sag, recently attended AT&T’s Shape conference in Los Angeles at Warner Brothers Studios and witnessed speeds up to 1.8 Gbps and heard rumors of speeds over 2 Gbps. CNET even corroborated some of these speeds with their testing on site during the event.

Samsung also had a delayed 5G version of the Galaxy Fold in the works, as it pulled back the Galaxy Fold’s global launch due to mechanical issues. Samsung says it resolved those issues and the company plans to bring the device back to the market soon, which may mean we could see a second 5G device from Samsung in the market very soon.

Samsung is one of the few manufacturers that is shipping both mmWave and Sub-6GHz devices in-market and is doing so in multiple geographies and doing it with a device that is mostly the same size and shape as its standard 4G version, albeit with a slightly larger screen and battery size. All of these abilities are what we believe makes them one of the, if not the leader in 5G handsets today.

Samsung’s devices are a mixture of Samsung’s own Exynos 5G modem and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 855 paired with Snapdragon X50 modem, with a sporadic mixture from one geography to another.

LG

Following Samsung is another Korean handset maker; LG. LG’s leadership is like Samsung’s in that the company created a new device to deliver 5G to its operators and customers. LG’s device for 5G markets is the LG V50 ThinQ 5G. One of the notable features of the LG V50 ThinQ 5G is that the back of the device has a light-up 5G logo that lets people know that it’s running on a 5G network. Also, like Samsung, LG is shipping both mmWave and Sub-6Ghz version of its devices with minimal physical changes around the world on multiple carriers.

In Australia, LG’s V50 ThinQ 5G is available on Telstra, using Sub-6GHz, the same 3.5 GHz band that many other global operators currently run Sub-6GHz 5G networks on. In the Korean home market, LG joins Samsung on all three major carriers, which include KT, LG UPlus, and SK Telecom. In Switzerland, Swisscom carries the LG V50 ThinQ while it appears that Sunrise does not. Switzerland is a Sub-6Ghz market and so is the UK as the LG V50 ThinQ is going to initially be a Sub-6GHz band device used for 5G, which is currently available on the only EE. In Spain, LG is also available on Vodafone with once again another Sub-6GHz version. Vodafone Italy also has the LG V50 ThinQ 5G available for sale on Sub-6GHz spectrum. In the US, LG’s V50 ThinQ 5G is available on both Sprint & Verizon and supports Sub-6GHz on Sprint and mmWave on Verizon.

LG’s V50 ThinQ is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X50 modem in all versions of the device in all geographies on all operators.

OPPO

OPPO is one of the world’s upcoming smartphone manufacturers and was one of the first manufacturers to launch a 5G phone in Europe. The OPPO Reno 5G, much like the other manufacturers’ models is effectively a 5G version of the OPPO Reno phone that launched earlier this year. The OPPO Reno 5G is only available as a Sub-6GHz device, which means that all the carriers that are carrying the device are Sub-6GHz operators currently. Right now, OPPO is shipping the Reno 5G in Australia on Telstra, in Switzerland on Swisscom and in the UK on EE. OPPO is also slated to have the Reno 5G available on UAE operator Etisalat next month with pre-orders available now. There hasn’t been any talk about a mmWave version of the Reno 5G. However, OPPO is a very innovative company and may come to market with one later. Currently, the markets that OPPO is most popular and successful in predominantly don’t have mmWave, so OPPO isn’t as aggressive about it as other manufacturers might be. I expect that OPPO will probably come to market with a mmWave variant if it plans to go after the Korean or American markets. OPPO may also have a mmWave version once China’s 5G networks go live and operators make mmWave spectrum available.

The OPPO Reno 5G also utilizes Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X50 modem for its handsets.

Xiaomi

Xiaomi has already announced and is currently shipping a 5G phone, which much like the competition is a modified version of a device that the company is already shipping. Xiaomi’s 5G device is the Mi Mix 3 5G, the 5G version of the already released Mi Mix 3 smartphone which features a Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 and adds the Snapdragon X50 modem in the 5G version. The Mi Mix 3 5G only ships with Sub-6 GHz 5G capability, which limits it to networks that are Sub-6GHz, which is currently most networks today. However, down the road that may change to where most networks will be a mixture of mmWave and Sub-6GHz. As such, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G is currently available in Switzerland on Sunrise and in Spain, Italy and the UK on Vodafone.

5G Handset “Close Followers.”

OnePlus

OnePlus is another smartphone manufacturer that has seen lots of growth, especially in India, the US, and Europe. OnePlus also has a 5G smartphone, and the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G is based on its OnePlus 7 Pro that launched earlier this year to much excitement. Because of OnePlus’ close relationship with OPPO, it isn’t a surprise that the company was able to put out a 5G device out in time and get it first in the UK on EE. In addition to EE in the UK, The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G is available on Elisa in Finland operating on Sub-6GHz spectrum.

While the OnePlus 7 Pro 5G is not available on many operators quite yet, I believe that OnePlus has plans to launch on more operators very soon. OnePlus has a very close relationship with T-Mobile in the US, and the company launched the OnePlus 7 Pro on its network, so I expect that the 5G variant will launch on T-Mobile as well.

The OnePlus 7 Pro 5G like many of its competitors, also features Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X50 modem. (pending MWC Shanghai info)

Motorola Lenovo

Because Lenovo owns both Motorola and Lenovo handset divisions, we will include both brands in this review of its 5G handsets. Currently, Motorola’s Z3 and Z4 are 4G devices. However, Motorola did make the ‘Moto 5G Mod’ which is an attachment device that can attach to a Motorola Z4 or Z3 device which has its own Snapdragon 855 and Snapdragon X50 modem and mmWave antennas for 5G connectivity. This device is currently only available on Verizon; however, it is possible that it could be sold on other carriers as well. In addition to the 5G Moto mod, Lenovo also announced its own Z6 Pro 5G smartphone with dual-sim 4G and 5G connectivity. However, there is no date for this device and will most likely launch in China as most Lenovo handsets do. Both of Lenovo’s currently planned devices operate on the Qualcomm Snapdragon X50 modem, as far as we are aware and what’s been announced thus far.

Huawei

Huawei has been a very curious case when it comes to its 5G products. It has announced two devices, the Mate 20X 5G, and the Mate X 5G. The Mate 20X 5G, much like the rest of the competitors is a modified version of the already released Mate 20 Pro. It features Huawei’s own HiSilicon Kirin 980 SoC paired with the new Balong 5000 5G modem with only Sub-6GHz band support. However, the device was supposed to launch on multiple carriers in Europe including Swisscom, EE and Vodafone and all those carriers pulled its Huawei devices after the US ban on Huawei affected Google’s relationship with the OEM.

Initially, Swiss operator Sunrise did pull the Mate 20X 5G device from its website, but the device appears to be on backorder its site at the time of writing meaning that Sunrise is the only operator to carry a Huawei 5G device globally. Huawei had plans to release the Mate X foldable phone with 5G capability, but the company has delayed that device citing the US ban. The company initially communicated that the Mate X could potentially be capable of the mmWave spectrum as well as Sub-6GHz, but then clarified that the capability might be there later this year. However, we have yet to see a mmWave RFIC from the company, and all others with mmWave capability have developed its RF-frontend for mmWave, and Huawei relies on suppliers for its RFFE to this date, so I’m not sure how or when Huawei will have mmWave capability.

Huawei also has plans to launch its Mate 20X 5G in the UAE this summer on two carriers, but exact dates are not quite solid yet. Huawei’s 5G plans may have been delayed and shaken up a bit, but we will continue to follow the company’s plans as the company launches devices on operators’ networks.

5G Handset “Late Followers.”

ZTE

ZTE has been a long-time player in the industry and suffered a significant blow to its competitiveness when the company was caught violating US sanctions on Iran. The US government temporarily cut them off from all US suppliers and eventually backpedaled after negotiations, potentially saving the entire company and its products. The ban put a bit of a wrench in the company’s gears and might explain why the company has only announced one device, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro 5G. However, ZTE has been losing its edge to the likes of Huawei, Oppo, and Vivo so that might play into ZTE’s late follower status as well.

The company has currently only announced that its ZTE Axon 10 Pro device, which is a variant of the Axon 10 that the company is already shipping is available in the UAE on Etisalat. ZTE says that the Axon 10 Pro 5G will be available in Europe in the first half of 2019, but none of the European operators at the time of writing are carrying this device and there’s less than a week left in the first half of 2019.

Vivo

Vivo has shown prototypes like the Vivo NEXT 5G prototype, but recently at MWC Shanghai 2019 the company finally announced its first commercial 5G phone, the iQOO 5G. The iQOO 5G, much like other operators is already a device that operates on 4G, and the 5G variant is an update to that while still running a Snapdragon 855, it adds the Qualcomm Snapdragon X50 modem and RF Front-end to add 5G capability. Vivo says the device will be available in Q3 but hasn’t stated carrier availability quite yet. It will likely be targeted at the Chinese market, as the Vivo iQOO is one of the best-selling phones in the Chinese market and will likely coincide with Chinese operators 5G launches.

Nubia

Nubia, another Chinese smartphone manufacturer, has committed to delivering a 5G phone this year but didn’t give any details until this week at MWC Shanghai 2019. The company announced the Nubia X 5G which much like the other manufacturers announced shares the same design as the 5G version of the Nubia X. The Snapdragon 855 SoC powers the Nubia X 5G like its 4G predecessor but adds the Snapdragon X50 modem to deliver 5G capability. The Nubia X 5G does not currently have any carrier availability or any expected general availability dates or pricing, yet. However, earlier this month Nubia did state that the company plans to ship the Red Magic gaming smartphone in India and China in 2020 with 5G capability.

5G Handset “Laggards”

Apple

Apple has been lagging behind the rest of the industry when it comes to 5G. Apple has previously relied on Intel for its 4G connectivity, but recently ended that relationship as what was rumored as delays. I believe that Apple’s agreement with Qualcomm to supply it with modems means that we will get a 5G iPhone from Apple in 2020. Because of Apple’s secretive nature, most of what’s known about Apple’s 5G phone is based on rumors and conjecture. In addition to its multi-year chip and license deal with Qualcomm, Apple is also hiring aggressively to build out its 5G capabilities, but I expect that could take anywhere from 3-5 years depending on whether Apple acquires Intel’s 5G modem business and IP.

Google

Google is the purveyor of the Android operating system that all 5G phones currently run on; however, as a device maker, Google is incredibly quiet about its plans around 5G. The company has teased that its next version of the Pixel, the Pixel 4 is coming soon, but hasn’t given any hints that it might come with a 5G variant. We expect that Google will come to market with a new phone in October and that there’s a high probability that it will feature Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X55 modem for 5G connectivity.

HTC

While HTC does offer the 5G HTC Hub through operators like Sprint in the US, the device is not a smartphone, and the company appears to continue to struggle to offer competitive phone designs. Nobody knows whether or not HTC will release any 5G phones this year, but it may be difficult to do since HTC sold a huge portion of the company’s smartphone engineering talent to Google last year.

Honor

Honor is Huawei’s value brand and generally follows the rest of Huawei’s lead on new technologies. As such, there’s been very little concrete information from Honor in terms of 5G, and when you consider that Huawei only currently has one phone selling globally on one operator but isn’t in stock yet, there isn’t much hope for Honor right now. Honor’s President George Zhao, according to Android Authority, made bold claims regarding the brand’s capabilities in 5G but didn’t give any concrete dates other than stating that Honor would be first to market and that Honor will have a 5G phone in 2019. Honor has still not said what device or when it will come to market or with which operator, so we consider most of these statements to be hyperbole at best.

Sony

Sony’s smartphone business has struggled as of the last few years, but it continues to release new phones. The company has not made any concrete announcements regarding a 5G phone, but Sony has shown off a working prototype of a 5G phone based on some of its current designs. The closest that Sony has come to a 5G device is its mmWave 5G prototype at MWC 2019, and it appears that it is as far as the company has come to releasing a 5G device. There have been rumors that the company may come to market with a foldable 5G device, but it seems to be unsubstantiated conjecture at this point mostly.

<B>HMD Global (Nokia)

HMD Global is the license holding joint venture between Foxconn Electronics and Nokia to design and manufacture smartphones. It hasn’t necessarily been one to go after the flagship part of the market, which is currently where most 5G phones exist due to 5G being a premium feature. As such, HMD has been coy about its 5G plans and giving exact dates or models. The company hasn’t demonstrated any 5G technologies or shown any prototypes, and the best we have in terms of future information are some rumors that HMD will launch two 5G phones in late Q3. HMD Global recently signed a 5G multi-mode global patent agreement with Qualcomm last month in May, so HMD is most likely gearing up to launch a 5G device relatively soon, but anyone’s guess is as good as mine at this point.

So, who’s leading?

After going through all the smartphone vendors around the market and assessing what they currently have, it seems that there is quite obviously a clear leader in 5G smartphones. Samsung is above and beyond and ahead of all the competition in 5G smartphones, and we believe that this leadership will continue into the remainder of this year and next year as the company prepares its next generation of 5G devices. Samsung also just stated a few days ago that the company has already sold 1 million Galaxy S10 5G phones in just Korea alone, which is an impressive statistic for such a new technology. Samsung is a close partner of Qualcomm’s, and Qualcomm has already stated that it plans to bring a 5G SoC to market next year and Samsung already committed to using that next-generation processor at MWC Barcelona this year. One thing to consider as well is that many of the Chinese operators are preparing to launch their 5G networks relatively soon and that means the Chinese OEMs will likely gain a lot of traction before the end of this year and ship considerable amounts of devices. <<

# # #

- Eric L -



To: Eric L who wrote (29)6/8/2020 11:07:10 AM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 47
 
Mobile 5G Technology Leadership 2019 Part 4: InfrastructureEquipment Providers

>> Who Is 'Really' Leading in Mobile 5G, Part 4: Infrastructure Equipment Providers

Will Townsend
Senior Analyst: Networking Infrastructure and Carrier Services
Moor Insights and Strategy
July 19, 2019,

forbes.com

There’s lots of buzz these days around 5G and what it promises to deliver beyond today’s 4G LTE networks. Billions of dollars are being spent globally by carriers to upgrade their core and access networking infrastructure to support new services for consumers and businesses alike. This article is Part 4 of our series, focusing on present 5G infrastructure leadership. In Part 1, we analyzed 5G intellectual property and patent leadership. In Part 2, we dug deeply into the 5G chipset ecosystem, and in Part 3 we examined manufacturers integrating 5G components from others into smartphones, notebook computers, hotspots, and other emerging form factors.

What constitutes infrastructure?

Before getting started, it would be helpful to define what constitutes infrastructure. For the purpose of our analysis, we include core network and radio access network components such as base stations and antenna arrays. Let’s take a look at each:

Core network components serve as the central part of a cellular network and knit together mobile, fixed, and converged connectivity in order to ensure more consistent user experience. For 5G, they include a higher degree of hardware disaggregation from a compute and storage perspective as well as software programmability over LTE networks. Companies that deliver industry-standard server platforms such as Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Lenovo have made significant inroads into the telecommunications space and have brought disruption from a cost and deployment agility perspective.

Some of the new capabilities that have come to core networking include machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), virtualization (NFV), and software-defined networking (SDN). Benefits include faster time to deployment, self-healing for improved uptime, and network slicing aimed at guaranteeing the quality of new service and new monetization opportunities for carriers and service providers.

Radio access network components, on the other hand, play an important role in how your smartphone or mobile device communicates across a cellular network.

Base stations are fixed points of communication within a cellular network that are designed to cover a specific geographic area. Based on the need for coverage, they can take the form of macro-cells that cover a wide area, micro-cells that are used for densification of coverage in highly populated areas, and pico-cells that boost coverage within buildings. From an outbound perspective, they communicate with smartphones, IoT devices and sensors, and soon automobiles. From an inbound perspective, the connect to the core network.

Antenna arrays are attached to base stations covered above to amplify coverage. For 5G, there are new requirements given its ability to deliver significantly lower latency and improved throughput over LTE with Massive MIMO factoring heavily. MIMO stands for “multiple-input, multiple-output” and combines a large number of antennas to improve broadcast efficiency. Base stations and antennas combine to constitute what’s referred to as the radio access network connecting devices to a core network.

Defining 5G infrastructure leadership

There are several factors we have determined as critical in identifying infrastructure leadership in 5G. First, is a provider shipping equipment that is pre-standard or meets “NR” new radio standard requirements. Second, if shipping any publicly announced deployments by the carrier. Third, the depth and breadth of spectrum support spanning low band or “sub 6” to mmWave. Fourth, any unique differentiation such as custom silicon or broader ecosystem program participation. Fifth and final, if not currently shipping any publicly announced trial activity by the carrier. Based on the above criteria, we evaluated and segmented infrastructure providers into two categories (single-purpose and multi-purpose) and within each identify leaders, followers, and laggards.

Single-purpose vs multi-purpose infrastructure providers

Single-purpose refers to traditional infrastructure providers that have historically deployed proprietary equipment to support wireless network buildouts. In our analysis, we included Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia, Samsung, and ZTE in this category, and all of these manufacturers supply the aforementioned defined infrastructure.

Multi-purpose refers to a mix of enterprise networking companies as well as industry-standard compute, storage and fabric providers that have extended their reach into the telecommunications industry by packaging and certifying their hardware, software, and services. For purposes of our analysis, we included Cisco Systems, Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise/ Aruba, and Lenovo in this category. Note that these manufacturers don’t supply traditional base stations and antenna arrays but do participate with its products in parts of the core and network edge.

Single purpose provider evaluation

Leader: Ericsson

Ericsson is currently shipping 5G infrastructure solutions that span mobile NR, inter-band carrier aggregation, as well as core and integrated radio solutions that include its AIR 1636 and 1623 form factors. From a deployment perspective, the company claims 23 5G contracts that include all four tier one carriers in the US, Vodafone UK, Swisscom, and Telenor in Europe, KT and SK Telecom in South Korea, SoftBank in Japan, and Telstra in Australia. Ericsson supports a broad range of spectrum and its Spectrum Sharing solution leverages scheduler algorithms to facilitate carrier deployments of 5G alongside current LTE networks.

I believe Ericsson is also doing a good job of differentiating itself by investing into AI and open source initiatives through the Linux Foundation to deliver agility, lower operating expense structures, and improved network uptime for operators. From an AI perspective, this is evidenced by embedding intelligent algorithms in base stations as well as equipping field technicians with augmented reality cognitive assistance for improved troubleshooting. Ericsson also has a strong historical incumbent position and given its recent financial performance turnaround is well-positioned to capitalize on 5G.

Leader: Samsung

Samsung is currently shipping 5G infrastructure solutions that span pre-standard and NR fixed wireless access (FWA) and mobility services. From a 5G base station standpoint, the company claims over 53,000 units have been shipped to South Korean operators including SK Telecom, KT, and LG Uplus. Over the past 12-18 months, Samsung has aggressively expanded out of its core Asian markets to supporting both 5G FWA and mobile deployments in the U.S. for Verizon dating back to October 2018. Sprint is also expected to follow suit after the conclusion of a field test of massive MIMO to support simultaneous LTE and 5G services for the carrier that hopes to merge with T-Mobile this year.

From a spectrum support perspective, Samsung’s 4T4R and 2T2R radio units support the entire breadth of mmWave spectrum as well as sub 6 with the 8T8R that is currently being deployed in Korean commercial 5G NR deployments. On the differentiation front, Samsung has significant capabilities in semiconductors as evidenced by its custom chipsets and also has depth in key 5G use case verticals such as automotive and manufacturing of not only 5G devices but also consumer electronics and white goods. Pointing to the latter, Samsung and AT&T recently launched a smart manufacturing testbed positioned as a “5G Innovation Zone” in Austin, Texas.

Follower: Huawei

Huawei is currently shipping 5G infrastructure solutions that span our infrastructure definition. China’s most successful telecommunications company claims to have shipped in excess of 100,000 5G base stations globally to date backed by 40 5G commercial contracts with nearly half in Europe. Carriers include China Telecom, China Mobile, and China Unicom, LG Uplus in South Korea, Three and O2 in the United Kingdom, KPN in the Netherlands, MTS the largest operator in Russia, and VIVA Bahrain, Saudi Telecom, and Etisalat in the Middle East.

From a spectrum support perspective, most of Huawei’s efforts around trial and deployment seem to be focused on the sub 6 bands. This may be due in large part to its home market operator focus on the mid-band spectrum for initial 5G deployments. Given Ericsson and Samsung are heavily betting on mmWave to support AT&T and Verizon in the US among other carriers, this could be a longer-term competitive disadvantage if Huawei has to play catch up. I also believe the company’s “loss leader” focus on offering low-cost hardware in lieu of more depth in software-defined tools and virtualized core as a potential disadvantage. From a differentiation perspective, Huawei is able to tap Chinese government subsidies to the tune of over $200 million based on its most recent annual report as well as a massive line of credit for its customers that some have estimated reaches a staggering $100 billion. The company is also developing custom AI silicon, and I learned earlier this year at their annual analyst summit they intend to embed it within every networking infrastructure solution. Those “smarts” could help deliver improved automation and remediation capabilities.

Follower: Nokia

Nokia is currently shipping 5G infrastructure solutions that span our infrastructure definition and claim that they have landed over 40 5G contracts that include AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile in the U.S., all three South Korean operators, China Mobile, SoftBank and Docomo in Japan, and Vodafone Italy among a handful of others in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. From a spectrum perspective, the company is supporting both sub 6 and mmWave with its AirScale base station solutions, but I don’t see a lot of innovation coming out of Finland despite the company’s storied beginnings dating back to the 1800s. In particular, it seems the company has been unwilling to aggressively embrace software-defined tools and AI to bring lower cost structure to operators as possibly a means to continue to milk its services business. A continuation of financial weakness in its core business is also discouraging pointing to an underwhelming fiscal 1Q reported back in April.

Laggard: ZTE

ZTE is currently shipping 5G infrastructure solutions that span our infrastructure definition, but one has to ask, why continue in the face of even more adversity than its Shenzhen cross-town rival Huawei? With a recent record loss of $1B in 2018, a massive $1.4B fine in the face of trade sanctions and a complete gutting of executive management, the company has been unusually quiet about its 5G aspirations. However, ZTE claims 25 5G contracts backed by 50,000 5G base stations shipped globally. Current deployments are mainly with the three largest Chinese operators but there are also a handful of wins with mostly smaller, regional operators in Europe and Asia. Like Huawei, most of ZTE’s focus is in the sub 6 spectrum range with announcements of trials around mmWave, technology demonstrations, “co-development” efforts, “innovation labs”, and testbeds with Chinese, Korean, and European operators. The embattled company is also trying to address cybersecurity concerns by copying Huawei’s lead in opening its own assurance centers in Europe and China. I believe ZTE could improve its position by taking an even more transparent approach in dispelling security risks. This could include inviting third party inspection of its manufacturing facilities and supply chain as well as considering western-based contract manufacturers.

Multi-purpose provider evaluation

Leader: Cisco Systems

Although Cisco is not in the business of supplying purpose-built cellular infrastructure, it does offer a packet core platform that bridges cellular, Wi-Fi and IoT connected services as well as integrates LTE today in a handful of devices for use cases such as temporary on-demand links, and redundancy. Examples of the latter can be found in some of its Cisco ISR and Meraki MX routers. However, with respect to 5G the company is embarking on a number of strategic initiatives thorough its service provider organization that are worthy to note. Two of the most recent ones include the OpenRoaming initiative and Cisco Unified Domain Center. Let’s examine each.

OpenNetworking was an initiative birthed by Cisco intended to enable a seamless experience as users pass between Wi-Fi 6 and 5G networks. It’s currently in beta test, but with the backing of Boingo, GlobalReach, and others, it has the potential to improve the connectivity experience by eliminating the need to log in and out of portals that are often agonizing tasks.

Cisco Unified Domain Center (UDC) is a software solution aimed at making it easier for operators to generate new revenue with 5G given the past challenges with LTE and a “dumb pipe” approach. The consumer benefits of 5G are obvious given the lower latency that will drive richer video experiences. However, it’s expected that 5G will be much more transformative from a business services standpoint. UDC will help extend enterprise services to mobile endpoints and implement it all through a highly secured, policy-based methodology that can span multiple mobile operators. The applications are diverse and include one of the most talked-about 5G uses cases - smart manufacturing. When I met with the team at Cisco Live North America, they shared that UDC is currently under evaluation by three major carriers with more to follow.

Leader: Hewlett Packard Enterprise/Aruba

Hewlett Packard Enterprise/ Aruba is taking a decidedly edge-centric approach in driving its overall 5G strategy. It’s no secret that CEO Antonio Neri has pledged an investment of $4B+ over the next 4 years to make the vision a reality and the Edgeline platform factors heavily here.

Beyond the network edge, from my perspective, HPE is driving one of broadest sets of telco-certified compute, storage, and networking portfolios aimed at core networking. The global services reach with Pointnext is compelling as well as the set of validated reference designs and NFV blueprints that have been published to date. Layer in a set of communications and media solutions that span industry-standard operations support systems (OSS) and business support systems (BSS) and the company is delivering an end-to-end set of offerings that span core to edge.

Aruba plays an important role as it leads the enterprise networking portfolio. There has been debate among carriers and networking providers as to the co-existence of 5G and Wi-Fi. Carriers might like to see Wi-Fi die a slow death, but the reality is that they are better together. Based on economics, indoor vs outdoor propagation, and use case/ application both will live on and Aruba is delivering compelling solutions based on the new Wi-Fi 6 standard that supports a greater density of devices, lower latency, and higher throughput for both campus and branch deployments.

Follower: Dell EMC

Dell EMC is leveraging its open standards-based DNA to deliver telco-grade compute and storage and operator collaboration at scale. I like the fact that the company is moving beyond a hardware focus to seek collaboration opportunities with carriers. At Dell Tech World this year, the company’s service provider team announced a partnership with Orange in Europe to develop and validate 5G use cases and business models with an emphasis on multi-cloud deployment to drive scale. The initiative will eventually expand to include 15 carriers that drive 80%+ of mobile broadband services globally.

Dell’s vision to bring a portfolio of companies together with Dell Technologies is another asset that I would like to see Dell EMC further leverage as it sets its eyes on 5G service opportunities. VMWare has a formidable set of capabilities including NFV assurance and SD-WAN with VeloCloud to enable new monetization opportunities. However, I believe Dell EMC could explore co-development opportunities with RSA to solve one of the biggest concerns being raised by governments and large enterprises alike, 5G security given the explosion of connected devices that are anticipated. The latter could quickly propel the company into a future leader status.

Future Player: Lenovo

Lenovo is not currently shipping 5G infrastructure solutions but has put a team in place to pursue a set of telecommunications offerings. I’ve had the opportunity over the last year to meet with leadership that boasts impressive credentials from the likes of Nokia and IBM. I’ve been consequently impressed with Lenovo’s overall telco strategy and ongoing pilot with one European operator. I believe the company can be competitive long term especially given its accomplishments in the server market.

Drum roll please - and the winners are…….

From my perspective, when you evaluate both the quantitative and qualitative attributes, the winner on the single-purpose infrastructure side presently is Ericsson and for multi-purpose infrastructure is Hewlett Packard Enterprise/Aruba. As single-purpose runner ups, Samsung is making great inroads and I expect to see them knock down more opportunities as 5G deployments progress. Huawei has great potential as well as it navigates through the ongoing US vs China trade war and considers some tactical course corrections. Or the multi-purpose runners-up Cisco Systems and Dell EMC, I expect to see continued innovation and leverage of each’s significant global market reach. Bear in mind this evaluation is based on the progress to date of each of these companies and could certainly change over time.

We may be at the apex of the 5G hype cycle but carriers around the world are spending billions of dollars in infrastructure from the likes of traditional providers Ericsson, Samsung, Huawei, Nokia, and ZTE as well as from what I’ve coined as multi-purpose players such as Cisco, Dell EMC, and HPE to cover a range of spectrum in the hopes of being first to monetize 5G use cases. We are probably several years away from the 5G “poster child” application of autonomous driving given the need for IoT telemetry in our roadways, but I expect to see significant 5G impact in areas such as manufacturing, retail, healthcare, education, and field service over the next 12-18+ months globally given the participation of all of the infrastructure providers evaluated in this article.

Disclosure: My firm, Moor Insights & Strategy, like all research and analyst firms, provides or has provided research, analysis, advising, and/or consulting to many high-tech companies in the industry, including Cisco Systems, Dell EMC, Ericsson, Hewlett Packard Enterprise/ Aruba, Huawei Technologies, Lenovo, Nokia, and Samsung cited or related to this article. I do not hold any equity positions with any companies cited in this column. <<

# # #

- Eric L. -



To: Eric L who wrote (29)6/8/2020 1:54:40 PM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 47
 
Mobile 5G Technology Leadership 2019 Part 5: Global Network Operatord (Carriers)

>> Who Is 'Really' Leading in Mobile 5G, Part 5: Global Carriers

Will Townsend
Senior Analyst: Networking Infrastructure and Carrier Services
Moor Insights and Strategy
July 29, 2019

forbes.com

This article is Part 5 of 6 in Moor Insights & Strategy’s series on mobile 5G leadership, focusing on current (not future) global carrier deployment of 5G networks. In Part 1, we analyzed 5G intellectual property and patent leadership. In Part 2, we examined the 5G chipset ecosystem, and in Part 3 we reviewed manufacturers integrating 5G components into end-user devices. Most recently, in Part 4, we discussed several 5G infrastructure providers and where each stack up from a technology and services capability.

What is a carrier?

A carrier is the most common term used for a company that provides wireless wide area networking (WWAN) or “mobile broadband” cellular service offerings. Martin Cooper, an engineer with Motorola, is credited with both inventing the cellphone and making the first mobile phone call back in April of 1973, and it took nearly a decade later before commercial service realization in 1984. A lot has changed in the last 35 years, but one thing is sure, cellular devices have revolutionized the way we all communicate on a personal and business basis, consume content, and transact our daily lives.

Defining the “G’s”

It’s probably worth revisiting the progression of mobile technology. “G” stands for generation and there have been significant step-levels of improvement over the years. 1G provided voice-only services over an analog network and service was fraught with dropped calls and poor security. 2G brought the advent of a digital network, and with it significant improvements in security, quality, and something we all use daily today – text messaging. 3G represented another technology leapfrog with mobile data support for web browsing and video calls (as well as Apple’s launch of the iconic iPhone). 4G is the current standard we enjoy today improving throughput and performance and helping birth disruptive services such as Netflix video streaming and ridesharing with Lyft and Uber.

What’s revolutionary about mobile 5G beyond faster speeds lies in something called latency. Simply defined, latency is the time it takes for a packet of data to travel from sender to receiver over a network. The lower the latency, the more responsive an application, especially if it’s video intensive and involves multi-player gaming as one example. Measured in milliseconds (ms), today’s 4G networks ring in at ~50ms in comparison to an expected sub 5ms latency for 5G. Latency equates to nearly real-time responsiveness, like in-home fiber, and carriers globally are eager to deploy 5G based on both the consumer and business applications that are poised to benefit.

5G mobile carrier leadership

Consequently, carriers globally are committing to billions of dollars in investment in 5G networks. Case in point, in the U.S., both AT&T and Verizon are each earmarking over a staggering $20B. The objective of our analysis in this article is to evaluate carrier 5G leadership presently, not the future. In the future, carriers could move up and down the stack. We believe there are two critical factors in determining leadership. First, are public announcements identifying specific 5G related services and an evaluation of overall capabilities to deliver a balanced mix of consumer and enterprise offerings. Second, are public deployment announcements with infrastructure equipment providers that we highlighted in our Part 4 article. As in past articles, we will identify leaders, followers, and laggards. For our evaluation, we focused on three regions – North America/ Canada, Europe, and Asia and evaluated the top carriers in each region based on subscriber size for a manageable analysis.

North America/ Canada

Leader: T-Mobile/ Sprint

When T-Mobile U.S. Inc. and Sprint Corp. announced their intention to merge back in April 2018, many were skeptical given Sprint’s historic financial underperformance and inconsistent service quality. However, from my perspective several positive factors were overlooked including strong leadership under then Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure in improving quality, a strong enterprise service base including a budding purpose-built IoT network, and an impressive spectrum footprint. I’ve also spent considerable time with Sprint executive management including CTO John Saw and IoT leader Ivo Rook and see the value in bringing more enterprise service balance to a historically consumer-centric T-Mobile. I’m also on public record from the beginning of the merger announcement voicing my belief that the deal would get done, and governmental approval late last week closed a long and arduous journey for both companies.

Once the multi-state attorney general lawsuit is settled, I firmly believe the combined company will deliver a balanced mix of both consumer and enterprise 5G services. Earlier this year, Sprint announced at Mobile World Congress Barcelona a partnership with Hatch to provide access to over 100 mobile 5G cloud gaming titles as well as live game and tournament streaming given eSports popularity. T-Mobile’s acquisition of Layer3 TV now re-branded TVision Home should provide an opportunity to monetize future 5G services with an Over-the-Top (OTT) streaming service in the home that could extend to mobile over time. From an enterprise perspective, Sprint brings its “Curiosity” IoT network and “solutions in a box” marketplace that aim to simplify deployment by focusing on core use cases such as asset and fleet management, mobile commerce, automation and control, and “smart” buildings among others. This solid LTE foundation should facilitate a rapid acceleration of 5G related IoT solutions given its full digitized architecture. The company also offers SD-WAN and other services that could be leveraged effectively for private LTE and eventually 5G service offerings.

From an infrastructure perspective, the combined companies have engaged Ericsson, Nokia, and Samsung on several 5G pilots with an emphasis on massive MIMO. This effort will enable an extremely flexible and cost-effective split deployment of both LTE and 5G NR given that both standards will co-exist into the foreseeable future. Deployment-wise, Sprint has lit-up mobile 5G in major markets including Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Kansas City, MO, and most recently Chicago with a mix of gear from Ericsson and Samsung. . T-Mobile has launched mobile 5G in half a dozen markets to date and is focused on mmWave initially likely to be followed by 600MHz spectrum deployments given the $8B+ paid for the latter in 2017. Intel and Ericsson have both participated in T-Mobile pilots for “sub 6” and mmWave at the higher bands, and I expect both infrastructure providers will be involved in 5G deployments.

Leader: Verizon

Verizon has a proven track record in providing a good balance of consumer and enterprise service offerings as well as a relentless focus on ensuring network quality and reliability. I’ve spent considerable time with the team visiting its labs, network operation centers, and proof of concept labs. I published an article about those learnings, and if interested, you can read about them here. I’ve also spent time with Chief Networking Officer Nicki Palmer to gain further insights into the company’s vision for 5G services. What impresses me most about Verizon is its forward-thinking concerning the application of 5G. I have personally visited the Alley in Chelsea, NY the company’s proof of concept incubator, and was impressed with specific 5G use cases that will be monetized by the company in the future spanning healthcare, public safety, and mobile gaming among others. The standout application from my perspective is with Medivis that utilizes mobile 5G and augmented reality to improve surgical procedure outcomes. Verizon has also created an investment fund called Verizon Ventures that is investing in areas such as virtual reality, IoT, and artificial intelligence to further accelerate possible use cases for mobile 5G.

From an infrastructure perspective, Verizon prioritized a home broadband service launch in late 2018 in four markets in the U.S with Samsung. With respect to mobile 5G services, Verizon has lit-up markets that include Chicago, Minneapolis, and Denver with plans to expand to 30+ metropolitan areas by the end of the year. Samsung is a strategic deployment partner for both fixed and mobile deployments as well as Ericsson for mobile 5G.

Follower: AT&T

This grading is a tough one for me because there are so many things that AT&T is doing right – from its depth of LTE enterprise services to a world-class AT&T Foundry program that is focused on birthing proof of concept activity. The telecommunications giant has also done a phenomenal job showcasing the possibility of 5G and related content creation and consumption at its annual Shape events held at the Warner Brothers Studios in Los Angeles. However, a lack of announced 5G consumer and enterprise services despite depth of its trials in key verticals such as healthcare, retail, transportation, and manufacturing is what places them in the follower category today. To complicate matters, AT&T has confused the market with its “5G Evolution” LTE network densification messaging going as far as placing the “5GE” icon on its smartphones when in reality it’s not a true 5G connection. With all of this said, the telecommunications giant could easily catapult itself into the leader category in the future as it completes customer trials and prioritizes which 5G services to bring to market.

From an infrastructure perspective, AT&T has deployed mobile 5G in roughly 20 U.S. markets to date and counts Nokia, Ericsson, and Samsung among its key launch partners. mmWave is the company’s initial priority, and it consequently has inherent challenges given the limited coverage area as well as signal propagation issues but is ideal of densely populated urban areas. However, AT&Ts densification plans should address these challenges longer-term and serve as a solid foundation for mobile 5G network expansion.

Laggard: Rogers Wireless

Canada’s largest carrier Rogers Wireless bet big in a recent 600 MHz spectrum offering paying nearly $1.7B in an auction. The Great White North is a challenging topography given its population clusters and vast distances between cities, but the company is planning to light up major metropolitan areas including Ontario, Northern Quebec, and Manitoba, among others. Currently, Rogers is focused on densifying its LTE networks as a precursor to rolling out mobile 5G and has conducted pilots with Ericsson in Toronto. Consequently, there aren’t a lot of public details related to planned 5G services to date given the fact that deployments haven’t begun.

Europe

Leader: Deutsche Telekom

Deutsche Telekom is the largest carrier in Germany and Europe overall as well as the parent company to T-Mobile U.S. Inc. The carrier boasts its networks span more than 50 countries and its T-Systems division offers business services that span IoT and cloud. From a 5G services perspective, the company partners with 19 start-ups that are poised to deliver services that span sports training and smart manufacturing among others.

Deutsche Telekom is currently deploying mobile 5G in six cities that include Berlin, Hamburg, and Munich with plans to expand to the 20 largest cities in Germany within the next 12-18 months. Initial infrastructure deployment plans include building out 300 5G antenna sites in 100 locations by the end of the year. The carrier counts Huawei among its infrastructure providers and has come to its defense, publicly stating that the ban could put Europe years behind the United States and China with respect to 5G deployments.

Leader: EE

EE is the largest carrier in the United Kingdom and a division of BT Group. They are primarily focused on mobile connectivity solutions for consumers and small businesses. From a 5G services perspective, the company has yet to announce any specific offerings for its consumer or business segments.

The company launched its 5G commercial network in May 2019 (the first in the U.K.) in six cities- London, Cardiff, Belfast, Edinburgh, Birmingham, and Manchester with plans to expand to 10 more locations this year and an additional 10 locations in 2020. Huawei is EE’s infrastructure partner for initial 5G deployments, and that relationship is expected to remain in place for the next 1-2 years. Given U.S. concerns over Huawei security threats with “backdoors”, EE and parent BT Group are seeking alternatives for both its core and radio access infrastructure longer term.

Follower: Vodafone Group

Vodafone Group can trace its roots back to 1982 - formed out of the United Kingdom’s largest producer of military radio technology. Today, the company boasts a presence in over 25 countries providing both consumer and enterprise mobile services that span fixed and unified communications, IoT, and cloud. Given its history of a balanced approach to both consumer and enterprise markets, I would expect Vodafone to focus on specific 5G services with its recent launch events. Rather, its focus seems to be decidedly pricing oriented. This strategy proved to be a misstep with LTE networks globally in the past as carriers battled each other over unlimited data plans that not only drove down ARPU but also allowed OTT services to better capitalize on monetization opportunities.

To date, Vodafone has launched mobile 5G connectivity in five cities in Italy, 15 cities across the United Kingdom, 15 cities in Spain, and 20 cities in Germany. Embattled Huawei is the company's lead infrastructure partner, but the company has publicly stated that it will second source with Ericsson. I believe Vodafone can become a leader if it takes a more 5G services-oriented approach long term.

Laggard: Telefonica/ O2

Telefonica operates networks in 16 countries across Latin America and Europe, including Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom under the O2 brand. Its consumer and business services are well balanced given Telefonica Business Solutions claims over 5.5M customers with a market reach into 170 countries. From a mobile 5G services perspective, the company and Chinese infrastructure provider ZTE have demonstrated 5G use cases centered on banking applications with Banco Santander in Spain as well as 5G smart city proof of concepts with Nokia and Ericsson, but there are no 5G commercial deployment plans slated until late 2019 to early 2020.

Given O2 is behind from a 5G deployment perspective in the United Kingdom, it recently struck a partnership with Vodafone UK. It's an interesting union given they are rivals, but I applaud the effort. In sharing the cost of infrastructure and deployment, both carriers will reap the rewards of lower capital expenditure and faster time to market for 5G services and subsequent monetization. I believe the partnership will bear fruit long term and could propel Telefonica/ O2 out of a follower status, especially if they embrace 5G software-defined networking tools to improve time to market and lower operating expense.

Asia

Leader: China Mobile

China Mobile is the largest carrier worldwide as measured by subscribers. It delivers a balanced mix of consumer and enterprise services with the latter, including tailored solutions for education, government, transportation, and public safety sectors. October 2019 seems to be the date that the Chinese government has set for mobile 5G commercial service deployment, but the company has been demonstrating compelling use cases for some time. I’ve attended several Huawei events in China as well as Mobile World Congress Shanghai (MWC-S) and have been particularly impressed with China Mobile’s smart city platform. Most recently at MWC-S, China Mobile demonstrated a live 5G telesurgery session (that a patient consented to!) as well as interactive sporting and cultural event experiences utilizing 5G and augmented reality. There aren’t any discrete 5G consumer or enterprise service announcements to date from the carrier but given the depth of trial activity they could bridge that gap quickly.

Huawei supplies over half of the infrastructure for China Mobile’s 5G network with Ericsson providing roughly one-third and Nokia and ZTE supplying the remainder. The carrier has ambitious mobile 5G plans that include deploying up to 50.000 base stations to support an initial 50 cities by the end of 2019 and eventually nationwide coverage of 340+ cities by 2020.

Leader: SK Telecom

SK Telecom is South Korea’s largest carrier and offers a range of consumer mobile services that span voice, content, and personal banking. From an enterprise services perspective, the company is focused on eight core segments with automotive, education, retail, and healthcare all aligning well to the benefits of mobile 5G’s improved speed and lower latency over LTE. From a 5G services perspective, SK Telecom is engaged in a number of initiatives that will result in commercialization including telematics for autonomous vehicles and a partnership with South Korean LG Electronics for connected robotics that leverage a 5G mobile edge cloud platform.

From a deployment perspective, the carrier boasts that a staggering 30,000 5G base stations are supporting coverage across 85 cities across the country — infrastructure from Samsung and Ericsson power the SK Telecom network.

Follower: Reliance Jio

Reliance Jio operates in India and may not be the largest carrier in the country, but its hyper-growth warrants attention. Founded in late 2016 by Mukesh Ambani one of the wealthiest persons in India, the company recently hit the 300 million subscriber mark in record time taking massive share from incumbents that have been serving the Indian market for decades. Jio has accomplished this using the latest LTE gear and software-defined tools to provide deployment agility, a lower operating expense structure, and network optimization for video and high availability. The carrier is taking a very pricing centric approach to disrupt the market initially, but I expect that its investment in modern infrastructure will facilitate a fast-path to 5G in the second half of 2020. An IoT based solution offering seems to be the next logical step for Jio from a monetization perspective, and its underlying investment in LTE should serve as a strong base for both IoT and future 5G services.

Laggard: NTT DoCoMo

NTT DoCoMo is the largest carrier in Japan, and its name says it all- DoCoMo is an abbreviation for “do communications over the mobile network.” The company can trace its roots back to 1991 when it spun off of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone to focus exclusively on cellular-based services. It offers a good balance of consumer and business offerings with the latter encompassing cloud, unified communications, and security. From a mobile 5G services standpoint, there haven’t been any formal announcements given the company has stated a commercial service launch date of 2020. However, 5G demo activity looks promising, including remote training applications that utilize virtual reality and security applications that encompass IP cameras and artificial intelligence. The carrier also announced its first 5G lab outside of Japan in Guam to help its global partner ecosystem validate 5G uses cases including the ones mentioned above.

Wrapping up

As stated earlier, the objective of our analysis in this article is to evaluate carrier 5G leadership presently, not the future. In the future, carriers could move up and down the stack. Carriers globally are racing to the finish line for the first phase of 5G given the tremendous monetization opportunities. I’ve examined each of the largest by region and call T-Mobile/Sprint the winner in North America, Deutsche Telekom the winner in Europe, and in Asia, it’s a near photo finish but I give the edge to SK Telecom.

In North America, the combination of T-Mobile and Sprint spectrum, leverage potential with parent companies Deutsche Telekom and SoftBank, 5G deployments, and announced 5G service and IoT offerings are compelling and position the union in the lead today. I also expect that regardless of which executives lead the combined companies, T-Mobile will continue to bring added value and disruption to both the consumer and enterprise markets. However, keep an eye on Verizon based on its size, scale, bullet-proof reliability, and grasp of impactful 5G use cases and applications. AT&T is on the cusp of the follower/ leader category, but I expect to see discrete 5G service offerings in the near future given all of its capabilities and investments.

In Europe, that geography, in general, has seemed to follow the 5G aspirations of carriers in both North America and Asia. Many carriers in the region point to inflated auction prices, scarcity of fiber for backhaul, and lack of compelling 5G use cases as a rationale for a more conservative deployment plan. However, these are hurdles that are easily overcome with intra-carrier cooperation as evidenced between Vodafone UK and O2 and infrastructure alternatives such as microwave for backhaul, as well as fixed wireless access/ point to point for last-mile connectivity. Deutsche Telekom, from my perspective, is the leader today given its market position, current 5G deployment plans, investment in ecosystem and 5G use case incubation through its Capital Partners fund, and mix of consumer and enterprise service offerings. However, EE has a similar trajectory to that of Deutsche Telekom with its current and future 5G deployment plans and could gain momentum quickly with a focus on discrete services.

In Asia, I give the edge to SK Telecom today. They have massively deployed 5G infrastructure and are actively working with partners to develop 5G mobile services for consumers and businesses alike.

To reiterate, this analysis is a snapshot today. I expect that global carrier leadership will shift over time. Proof of concept 5G labs will turn trials into services, and carriers will continue to expand mobile 5G deployments based on their spectrum assets at hand. In my mind, the ultimate winners will be the ones that focus on transformative 5G services. Case in point, ridesharing was only possible with the deployment of LTE networks. I can’t wait to see what all of these very capable carriers enable on a global basis with mobile 5G.

Disclosure: My firm, Moor Insights & Strategy, like all research and analyst firms, provides or has provided research, analysis, advising, and/or consulting to many high-tech companies in the industry, including Sprint and others, cited or related to this article. I do not hold any equity positions with any companies cited in this column. <<

# # #

- Eric L. -



To: Eric L who wrote (29)6/8/2020 2:54:44 PM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 47
 
Mobile 5G Technology Leadership 2019 Part 6: Policy, Regulation And Consortia

>> Who Is 'Really' Leading in Mobile 5G, Part 6: Policy, Regulation And Consortia

Will Townsend
Senior Analyst: Networking Infrastructure and Carrier Services
Moor Insights and Strategy
October 12, 2019

forbes.com

Everyone wants to talk about mobile 5G and how they are leading in the space. However, the reality is that mobile 5G is a broadly encompassing wireless standard that will change the way we view the future of cellular communications and the possibilities like never before. As such, it takes a deeper understanding to evaluate who’s leading in mobile 5G.

This article is the final one in our 6-part series, focusing on where regions around the world currently stand on 5G policy and regulations as well as consortia that supports deployment and innovation. As a recap to our series on mobile 5G leadership, we concluded in:

• Part 1 that Qualcomm is the leader in intellectual property and patent leadership
• Part 2 that Qualcomm is also by far the standout in the 5G chipset ecosystem
• Part 3 that Samsung is the undisputed leader in integrating 5G components into end user devices
• Part 4 that Ericsson and HPE are 5G infrastructure leaders
• Part 5 that T-Mobile/ Sprint, Deutsche Telekom, and SK Telecom are carrier leaders given their readiness to deliver 5G services.

How important is the race to 5G?

Many around the world view 5G as a significant technology that could serve as a catalyst for an industrial evolution. Consequently, the term “Industry 4.0” has been coined to capture the notion of factories integrating 5G connectivity, sensors, computational power, and edge analytics all aimed at improving production yields and operational efficiency. Some carriers such as T-Mobile in the United States in its ongoing bid to acquire Sprint argue that a first-mover status could advantage one region over another in the form of job creation. Many political leaders globally also surmise that 5G consumer and business services have the potential to drive significant economic expansion much like what 4G LTE did in birthing a disruptive, multi-billion-dollar ridesharing service that has toppled the taxicab industry.

Defining regional leadership

For our evaluation, we focused on four countries/ regions – United States, China, Asia Pacific, and Western Europe, and evaluated three vectors – published governmental policy related to 5G, spectrum allocation and regulation, and consortia to support 5G applications and use cases. We then assigned a letter grade given where we believe each region stands today: “A” for above average in meeting all criteria, “B” for average in meeting two, and “C” for passing in meeting one.

United States

The United States government has been aggressively backing the deployment of 5G networks. A number of presidential memorandums and reports have been published dating back to 2018 that can be found here. Research has also been directed toward spectrum allocation with three key priorities recently highlighted in a report published by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Titled “Emerging Technologies and their Expected Impact on Non-Federal Spectrum Demand”, the report recommends pursuing spectrum flexibility with an emphasis on multi-band deployment, improving spectrum awareness through research and monitoring, and maximizing efficiency while balancing the needs of both governmental and private business stakeholders. One of the most significant pieces of published U.S. policy related to 5G is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 5G FAST Plan. It outlines three core strategies- making more spectrum available, updating infrastructure policy, and updating regulations.

From a spectrum allocation and deployment perspective, the United States is the only region to deploy both Sub 6 and mmWave spectrum for future 5G services. If you want to learn more about spectrum and the differences between 5G standalone (SA) and non-standalone networks (NSA), I published a recent Forbes article that can be found here. The FCC has been very aggressive historically in wireless spectrum auctions, and the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS)/ OnGo Wireless also realized its initial commercial deployment late last month to provide a flexible sharing model that repurposes military spectrum in an effort to provide more of this precious resource to support new service offerings.

From a consortia perspective, the United States lags other regions in the world. However, 5G infrastructure providers such as Ericsson and Samsung have struck strategic relationships with AT&T and Verizon for proof of concept labs and testbeds for smart manufacturing, healthcare, and education applications among others. The University of Texas at Austin also hosts the Wireless Networking and Communications Group tasked with investigating industrial applications tied to next-generation wireless networking. Given the aforementioned initiatives, we consequently believe the United States can check the box in this area.

Grade: A

China

Dating back to 2018, the Chinese government through its National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has backed 5G investment, research, and subsequent testing. It is widely speculated that Huawei benefits significantly from a resource perspective as well as credit facilities that are made available to carriers that consider Chinese-made infrastructure. The NDRC also recently announced that it would fast-track 5G commercial licenses to spur deployment and service innovation. However, beyond these considerations, there isn’t the same level of published plans and research as compared to the United States.

From a spectrum allocation and deployment perspective, Sub 6 is deployed in the region with mmWave planned. The country’s (and world’s) largest wireless telecommunications infrastructure provider Huawei has invested significant resources to further 5G innovation and engages with the three national carriers in trial and demo activity, but no formal consortia exist. There have been some efforts behind a EUCHINA IoT and 5G collaboration but it seems to have concluded at the beginning of this year. Despite these shortcomings, China recently reported that over 10 million subscribers have signed up for 5G access plans ahead of commercial deployments.

Grade: B+

Asia Pacific

In contrast to China, the government of South Korea has been aggressive in its pursuit of 5G policy due in large part to the country’s poor monetization of prior 4G LTE investments. I attribute this to a singular focus on a national strategy for 5G authored by its Ministry of Science and Technology. With a stated goal of creating over half a million new jobs by 2026, South Korea has identified 10 key industries benefiting from new 5G services that include new content, smart factories, autonomous vehicles, digital healthcare, and smart cities. Today, South Korea is a leader in mobile 5G deployment with an astounding 2 million subscribers across all three carriers.

This past spring, Japan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication finally allocated and assigned spectrum for future 5G services, but the country is significantly behind the United States, China, and South Korea from both a published policy and deployment perspective. India’s economy is exploding by all measures but ironically 5G deployment has not been a priority even with carrier darling Reliance Jio that has aggressively embraced multi-purpose infrastructure to quickly and cost-effectively build out a reliable 4G LTE network. There is little published Indian 5G policy and spectrum allocations aren’t expected until the end of the year given a 2020 target date for service delivery.

From a spectrum allocation and deployment perspective, Sub 6 is deployed in the region with mmWave planned although there are some indications that Japan is deploying mmWave. The Asia Pacific region would benefit by building a 5G consortia among larger and smaller nations to drive faster adoption and new service innovation.

Grade: B

Western Europe

Western Europe has been decidedly conservative in its approach to 5G deployments, an almost “wait and see” attitude relative to the rest of the world. Could massive governmental subsidies used in the past to build free public Wi-Fi networks be cooling receptivity to mobile 5G in the short term? Time will tell, but the European Union is a much more complicated environment for 5G deployment given individual countries publish regulations and allocate spectrum. From my perspective, they are behind North America and Asia Pacific with only the United Kingdom being the shining star for initial mobile 5G deployments, albeit with an emphasis on access and price versus services. The European Commission guides overall 5G policy, and its 5G Action Plan for Europe attempts to align deployment, set standards for spectrum allocation, promote early deployment and trials, drive standards.

From a spectrum allocation and deployment perspective, Sub 6 is deployed in the region with mmWave planned with the exception of Italy where it has been deployed. However, spectrum auctions by country seem to lag that of the rest of world. From a consortia perspective, Germany is the driving force behind the 5G Alliance for Connected Industries and Automation (ACIA). The ACIA is tasked with ensuring the best application of 5G technology for connected industries including manufacturing and process. I believe it’s a model that other countries should consider replicating given its working group focus on use case and requirements, spectrum needs, architecture, and test validation.

Grade: C

Wrapping Up

Our analysis is based on a snapshot of where these countries and regions are from a 5G policy, spectrum allocation, and consortia effort today. All four have some degree of published policy on 5G, but the United States is the current standout. From a spectrum allocation and deployment standpoint, the United States is also deploying in more bands including the propagation-challenged mmWave high bands, but 5G ecosystem leader Qualcomm is helping to level technical hurdles over time. The company’s Dynamic Spectrum Sharing platform and recent mmWave antenna module enhancements have the potential to extend range from 500 feet to 1+ mile. Technology breakthroughs such as these should change the future deployment economics of mmWave and allow other regions to catch up. Finally, consortia can be a powerful element in accelerating the deployment of 5G and supercharging innovation. Western Europe shines in this regard today but gets our lowest mark given that’s the only box they are checking among the three defined criteria.

All of this analysis begs the question, if 5G is a race, is it a sprint or a marathon? I would argue the latter and those regions that align policy, regulation, and consortia effectively should reap the benefit in the form of job creation and economic expansion.

Disclosure: My firm, Moor Insights & Strategy, like all research and analyst firms, provides or has provided research, analysis, advising, and/or consulting to many high-tech companies in the industry, including Ericsson, Samsung, Qualcomm, and others cited or related to this article. I do not hold any equity positions with any companies cited in this column.

We are a technology analyst and advisory firm with actual industry experience. The markets we address span the the Internet of Things (IoT), client computing, cloud, the software-defined datacenter and semiconductors. We research, evaluate, consult, advise and communicate. Unlike other analyst and consulting firms, we have actual industry experience. MI&S analysts and consultants have held executive-level positions in strategy, product management, product and channel marketing, technology, P&L management and market research at technology companies.

© 2020 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. <<

# # #

Hats off to Forbes who published this 6 part Series in 2019.

The Series is an exceptional backgrounder on the 5th Generation of Mobile Wireless technology in its early stages of commercial deployment and I learned a lot from it.

- Eric L -