Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (1237377)	6/7/2020 6:08:50 PM
From: RetiredNow	2 Recommendations Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Taro Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574005

yes, agreed. I wasn't too surprised Twitter censored Trump. I have been curious for the last several years why it had not already happened. I think they were afraid of what Trump would do. Now, they took the step to censor him, they realize that the wheels of our justice system work very slowly, so there is very little the courts and regulatory bodies can do to stop Twitter from censoring Trump between now and November. So by then, if all the social media companies collude to deplatform Trump, which is essentially what they are doing, then 99.99% of what people hear and read online and on TV will be anti-Trump. That will serve to throw the election to Biden in a convincing way. That's where we are headed. I don't know what Trump can do to combat that. Censorship is a terrible tool of authoritarians, but the tech companies are all in on censorship to get their liberal candidates into power. Having said all that, Trump is a winner. He consistently has pulled a rabbit out of the hat, just when you think all is lost. So I wouldn't count him out until the fat lady sings in November. BTW, I just realized that expression "fat lady sings" may offend some of the snowflake politically correct nowadays, but I love that expression so I'll keep using it. :) Maybe I should change that statement to "expansive statured lady sings"? Or maybe I'm not supposed to use the word "lady" either. So how about "expansive statured cis-gendered female sings"? I'm too old for this. I'll have to hire a consultant to teach me how to speak this new language of the liberals. :)