Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William H Huebl who wrote (13579)	1/28/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Barbara Barry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Bill, I guess that would be Oct 1, after today.No puts yet....Vix,trin(even though you hate that one), vol.etc..says we still go higher and we are taking out resistance.Keep an eye on the follow through and the A/D line for me and let me know what your vix says.Your charts are hot indicators right now and barron's has turned on you.<VBG>But that's why we have so many indicators to use. TIA Regards, Barbara

To: William H Huebl who wrote (13579)	1/28/1998 10:12:00 PM
From: posthumousone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

why is the deficit going down and the national debt going up? if the national debt is still going up, is it only going to set up a harder fall? how have we managed a surplus? my whole problem with Clinton, well all politicians, is how can you validate the information they give you? "IF" he can lies to his wife, under oath, and encourages (clinton says he never urged anyone to lie-who talks like that besides a lawyer) others to lie...........isn't it concievable that he could direct his staff to manipulate the numbers in his favor to secure his legacy? "we have a budget surplus" (the crowd roars in approval) But how did he arrive at that #? i don't know the answer just cynical did we use the money earmarked for SS? which would in effect negate a surplus......or did we really have surplus from reduced spending and more revenue? just curious