It Was Obama All Along
Worse than Watergate: Part 3.
by JED BABBIN
June 29, 2020, 12:03 AM
The Obamas on the Truman Balcony on January 19, 2017 (Wikimedia Commons)
 Listen to this article
Editor's Picks
Hunter Biden Cashed In to Fuel His Drug and Sex Habits
by George Neumayr
Targeting People With Mental Illness and Dementia for Euthanasia
by Wesley J. Smith
A Red Wave Through the Bayou
by Scott McKay
Is Mass Immigration Killing Two-Party Democracy in the U.S.?
by James Delmont
MORE POLITICS
Sign Up to receive Our Latest Updates!
REGISTER
Hot Off
The Press
IN PRINT
As America Recovers From the Coronavirus, MAGYA
by DOV FISCHER
SPECIAL REPORT
Bribing the World, With Chinese Characteristics
by SHAOMIN LI
BUY THE BOOK
Clinton and the Puerto Rican Terrorists
by MARK HYMAN
A FURTHER PERSPECTIVE
And Then They Came for the Catholics
by ANNE HENDERSHOTT
SUNDAY REPORT
The Junipero Serra Skirmish
by GEORGE NEUMAYR
The publication of a set of notes taken by now-disgraced former FBI agent, Peter Strzok related to the prosecution of former national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn provides the first specific evidence that former president Obama was behind the wrongful prosecution of Flynn and, almost certainly, the investigation of Donald Trump’s campaign and presidential transition.
Strzok took the notes at a January 5, 2017 White House meeting at which he, Obama, Joe Biden, then-deputy attorney general Sally Yates, then-FBI director James Comey and Susan Rice, Obama’s national security adviser, all were present.
The notes recount part of the conversation as follows:
Rice-Comey-Yates: [Flynn cuts] Other countries…
(Note: this probably means they listened to partial recordings of the Flynn-Kislyak conversations)
Comey-Yates: lean forward on [unclass?]
Biden: “Logan Act”
Obama: These are unusual times
Biden: I’ve been on the intel cmte for ten years and I never
Obama: Make sure you look at things + have the right people on it
Obama: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling transition team?
Comey: Flynn – Kislyak calls but appear legit
Obama directs the investigation of Flynn to proceed. He doesn’t say “have your best people on it,” he says, “have the right people on it” which means something entirely different: have politically reliable people investigate Flynn. Obama directed Yates and Comey to have people who could be relied on to pursue Flynn perform the investigation.
The next relevant meeting we know about is the one that took place on January 23, 2017, after Trump’s inauguration and long after Comey told Obama that the Flynn-Kislyak conversations appeared to be legitimate. Bill Priestap, then the FBI’s head of counterintelligence, made the notes of that meeting either during or after it. The meeting was between Comey, then FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, and himself.
Priestap’s notes recall conversations in which the three apparently decided to not warn Flynn of his constitutional rights or that there was a risk of Flynn being prosecuted for lying to the FBI.
Priestap’s now-famous notes say, “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?… If we get him to admit to breaking the Logan Act, give facts to DOJ + have them decide.”
Comey, Priestap, and McCabe were following Obama’s orders and setting up the interview to entrap Flynn into lying or admitting a violation of the Logan Act, the 1807 law precluding American citizens who lack governmental authority from negotiating policy matters with representatives of foreign governments.
Comey had already determined that the Flynn-Kislyak conversations appeared to be legitimate. There is absolutely no doubt about their legitimacy: Flynn, as incoming national security adviser to the already-elected Trump, would be highly derelict in his duty if he hadn’t had such conversations with Kislyak and a wide variety of foreign government representatives on any subject relevant to Trump’s concerns.
But the investigation continued, the FBI interviewed Flynn on the record and, after the investigation was continued by special counsel Robert Mueller and his team of partisan Democratic prosecutors, Flynn pleaded guilty rather than have Mueller persecute Flynn’s son.
Go back to the meeting with Obama, Biden, Yates, Comey, and Rice. This wasn’t an extraordinary event. It was a routine event for the president to be briefed on a counterintelligence investigation.
What made it unique is — as Obama noted — these were unusual times.
The Flynn investigation “Crossfire Razor” was nothing more than an offshoot from original “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation into Trump’s campaign. We have, as yet, no proof that Obama was directly involved in and directed the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation. But think about the people who ran it: CIA Director John Brennan, Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. There is zero chance that the three ran “Crossfire Hurricane” without Obama’s knowledge. And there is no reason to believe that he was more reluctant to issue them orders on how to conduct that investigation than he was to direct Comey and Yates to investigate Flynn and “put the right people” on it despite the obvious legitimacy of Flynn’s actions.
For those who have forgotten, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s surveillance warrants against Carter Page — all four of them — were based on the fictitious “Steele dossier,” the compilation of opposition research materials paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Which brings us around to the January 6, 2017 declaration by the Director of National Intelligence that the entire U.S. intelligence community (“IC”) that the Russian interference in the 2016 election was intended to benefit candidate Trump.
We know now — and the intelligence community knew then — that the Steele dossier was a product of Russian intelligence activities. Steele had based his series of memos on Russian sources. But the IC was determined to defeat Trump and then to disrupt his transition to the presidency. In short, the January 6 declaration was as false as the Steele dossier itself.
It’s a great pity that you can’t impeach someone who is no longer in office, because Obama’s actions — clearly in violation of the law and of the constitutional rights of Flynn, Trump, Carter Page and others — were entirely worthy of impeachment.
During the Watergate investigation of President Richard Nixon’s actions, Sen. Howard Baker (R-Ten) famously asked, “What did the president know and when did he know it?” In the case of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, the question is what did Obama do and when did he do it?
So where do we go from here?
One trusted source tells me that Susan Rice — she who took to the airwaves and lied about the Benghazi attack on five Sunday news shows and participated in the push to investigate Flynn — is high on Joe Biden’s list of possible vice presidential running mates.
Biden’s participation in the unjustified pursuit of Mike Flynn (of which he says he was aware, but doesn’t admit its illegitimacy) makes him unfit for the presidency. And if he chooses Susan Rice as his running mate and wins the election, we’ll be governed by the two of the worst people. It’s a kakistocracy in the making.
|
