SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Skinner who wrote (46017)1/28/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: John Solder  Respond to of 58324
 
>>Ask yourself is it better fora CEO/company to to run the company or run the stock.

I asked, and you know what I said ?
I said it's the failures in running the company that are adversely
affecting the shareholders equity and hence the public perception
of the company. You cannot separate the two. A well run company is
a consistant company in earnings as well as public opinion.

Basically, run the company correctly and the stock will take care of itself.



To: Robert Skinner who wrote (46017)1/28/1998 9:24:00 PM
From: balloonman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Bob, yours is a retorical question. the only reson a reasonable person would invest is to make a profit. I submit, that the only reason a company exists is to make the owners a profit (presumably that us). KE has done the profit thing very well in the past few years (what has happened recently to change that ?). But to suggest the 'business of hyping the stock' is not in 'OUR' best interest is puzzeling to me. My real concern and question comes out of total ignorance in this area and that is : How can a company's stock drop 30% with a few million shares in after hours trading. and then in the next few days trade close to 1/3 of there outstanding shares and only move in a narrow range. I would entertain any explaination (logical or otherwise) . And i suspect otherwise is more on the mark. balloonman.