SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (160114)7/13/2020 12:30:51 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 220025
 
Re <<TSLA>> ... Dunno about insane but certainly making it easier and easier to wager against all-in.

Re <<DRD>> ... folks need to see gold going somewhere as opposed to becalmed. S Africa reintroduced curfew & no-alcohol-sale. Dunno about the factories & mines. Vulnerable until gold makes up its mind.

Apparently we are supposed to be careful about August 18 - 30

And, point (11) in below article is interesting ... that I gather as options trades are taking up the flag to rally the stocks. 1929 was that way.



zerohedge.com

Goldman Says Investors Have Just One Question Every Morning: "Do I Want To Fight Or Follow The Fed Today?"Authored by Tony Pasquariello, Goldman's global head of Hedge Fund sales

1. While volatility in the bond market remains suppressed, the global equity complex continues to feature pockets of high velocity (incidentally, I don't think those statements are mutually exclusive). The story of the week was the breakout in Chinese equities, which have added $1tr of market cap since the end of June. One can argue that elements of retail fever have spread into the region -- the GS basket of Asia retail favorites, GSSZRFAV, is now 77% off the March lows -- with seemingly clear (if tacit) support from the government. Note that A-share volumes haven't been this high since the equity boom-then-bust cycle of 2015 -- an experience one should remember clearly -- while also noting that margin balances are considerably lower today. I tend to come out where GIR's Kinger Lau does: +15% over the next 1-3 months, but flat out one year ( link).

2. The China story is part and parcel of a broader theme we can detect clearly in our franchise: increased interest in non-dollar equity markets, including Asia and perhaps most pronounced in Europe. I recognize and respect the noise factor in the US over the next four months ... and, that the more cyclically-driven laggards will most surely outperform on the realization of a vaccine ... but, that doesn't translate to an anti-US equity bias for me (I still like NDX on a tactical basis), Rather it argues for having upside on some other horses like EEM, which I think offers attractive upside convexity. Furthermore, in the context of portfolio construction, I have some sympathy for downside on the dollar ... again, not b/c I'm negative on the US, but rather b/c the Fed is out-stimulating the field and the carry advantage is behind us now.

3. I am sober about the fact that the growthy parts of the market are arguably extended -- see point 7 below -- and, again, I think one needs to diversify the lines they have in the water. in the very big picture, however, I think the macro equity investor still needs to ask this question when they first open their eyes in the morning: do I want to fight the Fed today or do I want to follow the Fed today? My point is there's an ongoing tailwind from the Fed -- which is more subtle than it was in April, but is still very significant; it's not crazy to think that QE could be upwards of $4bn per business day for another few years. In the end, I think that argues for ongoing support to tech multiples, while of course understanding that there will be ebbs and flows along that path.

4. The US election is coming into view, now just 80 trading days out (both a short time and a long time). Like everyone, I've been burning some brain cells on the portfolio implications -- more to follow, but in good faith the exercise is multifold and complicated. for now, I'll attach a very comprehensive note from GIR's David Kostin and I'll register a fair take from GIR's Dominic Wilson: "the dominant market issue in our view so far has been Vice President Biden's proposal to reverse half of President Trump's cut in the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, which we think could become a strong possibility in the event of a Democratic 'sweep.' Given that such a reversal would translate directly into a hit to after-tax earnings, the implication is that it would flow through to a notable hit to US equity market valuations. Even here, the picture may be more complicated, however. There is a good chance that any shift would be fiscally neutral and could also be phased, so the full market impact would depend on what other measures accompanied it (some, like capital gains tax increases, might add to pressures of course). And given the high level of uncertainty about the broader economic outlook, these shifts may be harder to isolate than in a less volatile market. we think more attention should be focused on the international implications, where a Democratic presidency is likely to move away from the aggressive use of trade policy in the current administration and adopt a more favorable view of international institutions and alliances" ( link).

5. On the topic of sentiment, I stumbled onto this from an email I wrote from this exact week four years ago, which in certain ways is the dead mirror image of today -- our problems are most certainly worse, yet some retail investors are gleefully investing in the stock market today in a way they were not back then: "I can see a scenario where years from now we'll tell stories of the time when the US was barreling towards full employment … and bonds of all kinds offered negative returns … and the Fed put was struck at-the-money on a rolling basis … and gas was cheap … and 80% of the country could refi their mortgage. And, one might say 'wow, people must have been very happy and made a lot of money in the stock market back then" … and the truthful answer will be 'no, actually, everybody was kinda miserable and it was a lot harder than it looked.'"

6. Following on from that point, again we can still observe a sharp dichotomy between a younger generation of stock operators (see point 11 below) and an older cohort of ETF/mutual fund investors. For example, I heard this week that the average age of a trader on the Robinhood platform is around 30 years old, while the average age of a respondent to the AAII survey is something over 55 years old. And, for as feverish as some of the retail behavior has seemingly been, it also contrasts with the views of the institutional community -- in the most recent GS Quick Poll survey, 2-in-3 respondents expect S&P to be lower from here to year end ( link).

7. Recently, a client pointed out that the market cap of AAPL is the same as the entire BKX index (US banks). that spurred an exchange with sales & trading colleague Pete Callahan, who noted the following, all subject to your interpretation:

i. the big 5 (AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, FB) have added a collective ~$470bn in market cap in the month of July alone (seven sessions) -- that is bigger than current market cap of every other S&P company. AMZN alone has added $210bn in market cap, which is more than the current market cap of ~95% of the S&P500. ii. sticking with those same names, F.A.A.M.G. = $6.56tr in market cap, which is twice the size of any other S&P GICS sector ex-healthcare ($3.85tr, so not far off).iii. the 25 biggest software companies in the market have added ~$1.155tr in market cap since the lows in March ... which is bigger than the current market cap of four entire S&P500 sectors (utilities, REITs, energy, materials).iv. on the other side of the coin ... within the entire MSCI World index, less than 25% of companies are growing revenue > 8%, illustrating the scarcity of growth.It's not totally obvious to me what to do with this, but I do think it's worth taking stock of where we are. I'll say it again: I still like NDX for the near-term as I suspect the Fed isn't backing down anytime soon and secular growth stocks are the big beneficiary of that ... but, for the avoidance of doubt, we're arguably getting into bubble territory in select parts of this market and a few things are going a bit vertical ... which should add volatility to the next phase of the game.

8. Giving credit where it's due: this is the ratio of the GS hedge fund VIP basket vs S&P. as GIR's David Kostin pointed out, since 2001, the basket has posted a 61% quarterly hit rate of outperformance vs the market ... an average quarterly excess return of 57bps:



9. As mentioned a few times, investor interest in ESG continues to be a major story -- and one that is very clearly manifesting itself in real flow-of-funds ( link):



10. On the same topic, witness price action in our Asia renewables basket, ticker GSAPRENE ... 22 companies with leverage to batteries, EV, solar and wind:

.

11. This is specific to the US market: as you can see, the fever has broken in single stock cash volumes ... while activity in the market for single stock options remains enormous (which I think reveals some of the US retail investor's recent participation). credit Vishal Vivek in GIR:



12. thanks to Alison Nathan in GIR, a dose of big picture perspective on S&P realized volatility. while knowing the second half will likely be less wild than the first half, the punch line is we're currently tracking for the highest year for actual vol since the Depression:



13. for the road:

i. h/t to Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam, who recently hit a baseball while water skiing with a Red Sox helmet on to raise money for ALS research (this checks like four boxes for me in one shot).ii. I thought this had some good ones ... 68 bits of unsolicited advice from Kevin Kelly ( link). given my day job, this one comes quite easily: "find smart people who will disagree with you."iii. for the parents ... my list of the US states with the most difficult capitals to remember: Kentucky, Missouri, Nevada, Oregon, North Dakota. no internet cheating.

Sent from my iPad



To: carranza2 who wrote (160114)7/13/2020 3:26:19 PM
From: SirWalterRalegh  Respond to of 220025
 
Even QCOM back in late 1999 did not act like this, except on one historic day when it went up 600+, if I recall correctly.

~$157.



To: carranza2 who wrote (160114)7/14/2020 8:41:42 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Julius Wong
zamboz

  Respond to of 220025
 
Ten Thousand Day Traders an Hour Are Buying Tesla Shares
www.bloomberg.com › news › articles › ten-thousand-...

17 hours ago - Robinhood users can't get enough of Tesla Inc. Almost 40,000 Robinhood accounts added shares of the automaker during a single four-hour ...

Ten Thousand Day Traders an Hour Are Buying Tesla Shares
www.bloombergquint.com › technology › ten-thousan...

17 hours ago - Ten Thousand Day Traders an Hour Are Buying Tesla Shares. (Bloomberg) -- Robinhood users can't get enough of Tesla Inc. ... Tesla was up as much as 16% at one point before paring gains through the day and finishing 3% lower. It was a rare losing day for the high flying stock, which has surged 56% over the past 10 days.

Top stories



Ten Thousand Day Traders an Hour Are Buying Tesla Shares

BloombergQuint·16 hours ago

More for 10,000 day traders buying Tesla daily
Web results



To: carranza2 who wrote (160114)7/15/2020 1:22:22 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 220025
 
Re <<TSLA>>

It is unusual that you and I both are creating wealth from TSLA even as you are long and I am short.

What I did with my unwieldy positions going out to eternity is to recalibrate and go w/ the short-attention RobinHooder flow, keeping the TSLA positions only relevant w/i current month, and actually only as far as 15-days out, far enough away from the money to be safer, and not be in the trenches w/ the to / fro equity longs vs crazy squeezed shorts.

Generally shorting more of the nearer-money closer-to-expiration, and less of the further away Calls, in case I need to double / triple up on risk-units.

I hope the TSLA fever goes on forever but understand should it fail to do so.

Am reserved in capacity to double or at a pinch, given the limited time line, triple up.

Intending to reinvest all gains into various flavors of gold, per easy come easy go, free is free.

Am wondering if the bulls obviously manipulating the shares via near-term calls have the wherewithal to ramp the shares to 2200 - 2800 before 15-days deadline cause the call rights to go poof. I intend to keep rolling the positions forward for I am as fidgety as the RobinHooders.

It is a pity this game cannot last forever.

Yes, am aware that TSLA heading to the NYSE. Am looking forward to the event to boost valuation, so as to de-risk the wagers going beyond that point.



zerohedge.com

The TSLA Call-Buying Scheme Is Not Working Again Today

Another day, another massive buying spree of deep-out-of-the-money-call "lottery tickets" in TSLA and another opening gap higher.

"Someone" is buying 100s of 1000s of share equivalents of $2500 and $3500 Calls that expire on Friday...



However, for the 3rd day in a row... it failed to ignite a sustainable momentum...



We detailed one reason why TSLA has been seeing this incessant opening panic-bid previously...

One topic that is occasionally brought up by Tesla skeptics, but rarely examined in depth, has been a litany of out of the money call buying in the name that appears to be occurring, relatively aggressively, on a weekly basis.

While the buying could be attributed to normal market forces, a new article by Dan Stringer looks into the specifics of one such trade that took place last week, where it appeared that over $2.5 million was deployed in a very short term, very out of the money options buy.

...

The author then lays out that OCC rules dictate that the clearing house must have a certain percentage of this stock on hand to deal with the calls should they move into the money. He estimates a 20% ratio:

The broker-dealers need to have some margin level (per Rule 601 of the OCC rules); this can vary by broker-dealer and is subject to calculations with these rules. I have heard a typical ratio is roughly 20% on hand, so for the purpose of this exercise, I will use that.

From there, he determines that the options buy would trigger a purchase of 716,000 Tesla shares to cover the trade. He also notes the timing of the transaction, pointing out that "broker-dealer margin requirements are sent out by 10:00 am EST, or within the first ½ hour of trading" and arguing that this could cause a spike at the cash open.

This would create a potential spike in buying at the open, causing shares to spike. The following 12,800 options would then require a further 256,000 shares to be purchased using the same margin requirement methodology.

...

The author concludes by stating that the options buy could be a "relatively inexpensive" way to generate some forced buying in Tesla.

For a large-cap company like Tesla with the volume of shares that have been trading over the last several months, this option position would be a relatively in expensive cost to generate some forced buying, at a cost of just 5% of the open position.

Recall, the topic of strange call buying was also brought up in a podcastwith well known Tesla skeptic, @TeslaCharts, in May. Though the buys were discussed, neither the host nor the guest could speculate as to why these buys might be taking place. Thanks to Dan Stringer's article, they may be on their way to an answer.

We reiterated this strategy seeming to occur on Friday.



The question remains - who is buying these lottery tickets in size and who in the world gets to benefit most from the TSLA share price being at these incredibly elevated levels?

Sent from my iPad