Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (173198)	7/17/2020 8:00:09 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 354262

I found the "study" that he cites. It is here: francesoir.fr It is simple minded. Even if the graph it presents is accurate, they don't present any evidence that it was HCQ that was actually responsible for the drop in deaths. Or that the ban was responsible for the increase. As many folks are fond of saying, correlation is not proof of causation. It could easily be coincidence and likely is. Indeed, there is nothing in the above article about zinc. There is nothing about how much HCQ was prescribed during the period after the ban was lifted. There is nothing that is "clear, simple science", which inode claimed. It is ridiculous. Again. But no doubt he will try again. He is either nuts or is getting paid to do this. Is there another explanation?