Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stsimon who wrote (160609)	7/27/2020 8:34:58 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217593

Re <<new / better>>, is typically defined by victorious side as “new / worse” for the losing side. So far what the USA has experienced in terms of change, relative to most other domains throughout history, has been kind & gentle, almost tepid, and lacking in kinetics. The situation may or may not change post November election, for the better or worse. I do not know enough to tell good vs bad change very precisely, as am not close to the situation(s). Gold is doing well by change, and that is okay in the sense that it is predictable, and gets all out of a mathematics problem, in the truly big picture. The trump certainly did not create the mathematics issue. He might solve it. Biden appears to continue trending, for change predictit.org But frankly should Trump win, he may accelerate change towards still more change. Either way the elections, change might go large and heavy, and resolve knot.