Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (6648)	7/29/2020 2:03:45 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22868

Yeah, I'm not going there with you. It is clear you're not open to the truth, which is ultimately going to come out. I'll put you on the list with the other "Death over Hydroxychloroquine" list. You simply cannot look at facts. I studied a lot of statistics back when, and the one thing that consistently came through to me was to never overlook the forest for the trees. We have study after study showing conclusively that this drug combination works and saves lives. We have a renowned epidemiologist -- 300 peer reviewed papers -- plainly stating that we have killed 100,000 Americans by ignoring this treatment and we will kill 10s of thousands more if we don't move forward with a competent HCQ treatment. We have innumerable physicians using the protocol and not losing patients. India is using it and has shown in the article last night that it without question provides prophylaxis in a loading dose plus two daily doses, even without zinc. The only studies that have followed the Zelenko protocol have consistently shown strong results, saving over half the lives vs. control groups. Nine Henry Ford Hospitals, same thing. Not one legitimate study has shown serious adverse side effects. No deaths. And of course, the drug has been used in billions of courses of treatment over the years and no one is complaining. Yet, you consistently return to irrelevant, low-probability nonsense as though it is somehow statistically sound reasoning. It isn't. You're sitting here looking at a p test at 0.0001 and arguing it must be the face masks, which have consistently been shown NOT TO MATTER through RCTs for decades. This is not analysis. This is foolishness.