SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (723153)8/9/2020 9:15:22 PM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793914
 
This doc Michael Mina has a good point - regular PCR tests are inconvenient and expensive. $1 tests would have changed the entire dynamic. You could do it often, and take measures if it turns positive. Right now, by the time the PCR test comes back positive, it’s all over. Either the person is very sick, or recovered - either way, the period of the highest viral replication and excretion is long gone.

But, it seems, the bureaucrats won’t allow it. Same thing for antibody testing - they have the technology to make them cheap and simple, for home use.

harvardmagazine.com

I used to follow this guy, but, it seems, he deleted his twitter account. Can’t find him anymore.



To: DMaA who wrote (723153)8/10/2020 9:47:04 PM
From: skinowski1 Recommendation

Recommended By
frankw1900

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793914
 
Dr Mina and Medcram on the subject of $1 CoViD tests: