SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : INFOSEEK (GO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony Ostroski who wrote (2124)1/28/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: OtherChap  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 9343
 
Reason for the last second decline explained:

Some people found out in the last 30 minutes of trading
that Infoseek was going to issue the big press release
about issuing the 3 million shares after the close. Even
though they had already stated it, it was hidden in their
4th quarter revenue statements.

Now it's TWO big stories on the newswires, and anyone who
didnt see it in the earnings will DEFINITELY see it now.

I would not be surprised to see the stock hit 8 tomorrow
in early trading.

Also, unlike the earnings report, the press release today
states that the new outstanding number of shares will be
30,243,000.. The old number was 26,806,208.

This can only mean one thing- they have decided at the last
second to issue NEW shares, not sell existing shares.
Which means an instant dilution of 10% for everyone who
held seek after the close today.

This looks like grounds for a class action suit if my
suspicions are correct. The earnings statement said EXISTING
shares only would be sold, but the press release tonight
appears to suggest they are going to print brand new
certificates and dilute existing shareholders.



To: Anthony Ostroski who wrote (2124)1/29/1998 8:41:00 AM
From: Pullin-GS  Respond to of 9343
 
No 80/20 crossover. Stochs go all over the place with volitile stochs like seek, and I don't give it much credence (unless at significant crossover is achieved). In light of the other stats I specified, I did not go into to much detail. Thanks for pointing that out.

Regards, Paul