SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (1254116)8/13/2020 5:42:21 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576378
 
As a RWer, you should be in favor of that....



To: Bill who wrote (1254116)8/13/2020 5:54:15 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Bill

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576378
 
Bill, I like how the Justice Department details its findings. From the article:
For the great majority of applicants, Asian Americans and whites have only one-tenth to one-fourth of the likelihood of admission as African-American applicants with comparable academic credentials, according to the release. Yale rejects scores of Asian-American and white applicants each year based on their race, whom it otherwise would admit.
And ...
Although the Supreme Court has held that colleges receiving federal funds may consider applicants’ race in certain limited circumstances as one of a number of factors, the Department of Justice found Yale’s use of race is anything but limited. Yale uses race at multiple steps of its admissions process, resulting in a multiplied effect of race on an applicant’s likelihood of admission, and Yale racially balances its classes.
This puts the onus on Yale, the birthplace of "safe spaces," to show that the applicant's credentials they look at comply with federal law, and that race really is indeed limited to certain circumstances.

No doubt this will kick off a series of legal challenges that will eventually make its way to the Supreme Court. Hopefully by then, we'll still have a center-right judiciary that still thinks discrimination can happen both ways, instead of a leftist judiciary that only applies the law when it benefits them.

Tenchusatsu