Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (28184)	1/29/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: Fred Fahmy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1586225

Paul, <Allow me to play "Albert Kovalyov":> You must have been an actor in another life <GGG>. You got it perfect.....and if AMD goes to $9.25 it will have even greater potential<GG>. I really hope that AMD (the company, I could care less about the stock) can survive because I think competition is good for all. Good for consumers, good for the industry, and good for Intel. However, it completely mistifies me that some people don't understand that Jerry Sanders is not the man. I hear a lot of crap here about this benchmark or that benchmark but the bottom line is that Sanders is a failed leader with losing strategies. The name of the game is to make money. AMD was suppose to start making money again last year. That's what investors believed at the beginning of 1997, that's what the analysts expected, and that's what the company expected. Yet, today they continue to bleed red ink. Here we are at the beginning of 1998 and the same conditions exist. AMD is suppose to make money this year. We'll see.... FF