SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: THE ANT who wrote (161865)8/29/2020 5:34:04 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone1 Recommendation

Recommended By
SirWalterRalegh

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217792
 
America’s first family is going to be put out of businessBy Ed Markey? The man that time forgot?


CHELSEA, MA: August 27, 2020: U.S. Representative Joe Kennedy meets with supporters in Chelsea, Massachusetts. (Staff photo by Nicolaus Czarnecki/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald)

By HOWIE CARR | howard.carr@medianewsgroup.com | Boston Herald
PUBLISHED: August 27, 2020 at 6:42 p.m. | UPDATED: August 28, 2020 at 8:06 a.m.

Is this really how the Kennedy dynasty in Massachusetts ends?

After a century of political treachery, chicanery and duplicity, not to mention scandal and depravity to the max, what was once called America’s First Family is going to be put out of business by … Ed Markey?

Ed Markey? The guy who’s been an invisible man in Congress since Gerald Ford was president? A lightweight’s lightweight, a glad-handing political weathervane with a comb over who in 2017 congratulated “the Boston Patriots” and who seems to think the Twin Drive In is still open in Medford.

Ed Markey, the Man That Time Forgot.

It’s not just the polls that indicate that a political era is coming to an end Tuesday. You see the trend in social media, on the newspapers’ message boards, in the preponderance of Markey yard signs, even in JoJoJo Kennedy’s 4th Congressional District.

It’s hard to keep a dynasty going, in any type of endeavor, and everything has to end at some point.

But Ed Markey? Whose first vote in the Senate was “Present.” Who was elected to the House the first time with something like 21% of the vote, in a special-election primary.

Can you imagine any of the real Kennedys ever rolling over for … Ed Markey?

Once upon a time, if they’d been behind like this, the Kennedys would have just plain stolen the election. Everyone knows about the 1960 presidential election, but 100 years ago, a Congressman named Peter Tague crossed the original Joe Kennedy over some World War I issue.

The patriarch put up his father-in-law, the ex-mayor Honey Fitz, and proceeded to engage in what may have been the most massive voter fraud in the history of Massachusetts. A year later, after an investigation, Honey Fitz was thrown out of Congress.

What would the late Rep. Joseph Casey think? He was a Congressman in 1942 and the Kennedys didn’t want him getting elected to the U.S. Senate and blocking the boys’ way in the post-war era.

The Kennedys hired priests to spread the scurrilous rumor that Casey’s wife had been pregnant when they married. Even JFK, the future president in the Pacific on PT-109, spread the rumor in his letters home, saying Casey had “put one in the oven.”

Then they put Honey Fitz into the primary to drain off more votes from Casey. He lost.

In the old days, the Kennedys would have also inserted a straw candidate into the race — somebody to drain off enough votes from Markey to put the callow ginger boy over the top.

When JFK first ran for Congress in 1946, one of his primary opponents was a Boston city councilor named Joe Russo. Pretty soon another Joe Russo from Boston got on the ballot. He was a janitor from the West End.

In the primary, Jack got 22,183 votes, way ahead of Joe Russo, who finished with 5,661 votes, and Joe Russo, who had 779 votes.

Why didn’t the Kennedys put somebody into the fight named Markey?

Wasn’t there a guy named John Markey in politics down in New Bedford? Mayor, judge, something like that. He’d be about 85 years old now. Perfect age for a straw!

Where the hell are Kenny O’Donnell and Steve Smith when you really need them?

Ed Markey even got the endorsement of the Kennedy family organ, the Boston Globe. Back in the day, in 1952, Jack needed his own newspaper endorsement, so his father Joe “loaned” a cool half-mil to the owner of the Boston Post, then the biggest newspaper in New England.

The current generation of trust-funders couldn’t have bought a newspaper endorsement or two, or perhaps paid off a few “influencers?” Or at least had a clambake for the local Fourth Estate, like Uncle Teddy used to do every summer in Hyannis Port.

And where was JoJoJo’s Hollywood glamour, the cheesecake, in this final Camelot campaign? His ancestors were, uh, seeing a lot of Gloria Swanson, Marilyn Monroe, Angie Dickinson, Darryl Hannah, etc., etc.

JoJoJo’s only big-name female California endorsement came from … Nancy Pelosi, 80 years young.

Do you think any of the brothers would have ever let Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez get away from them? In any way.

Young JoJoJo seemed to be carrying a lot less baggage than his ancestors. Unlike both his grandfather and great uncle, he was never tossed out of a school for cheating.

In the old days, the Kennedys would have just ordered Markey not to run for re-election.

Back in ’60, after JFK won the presidency, Gov. Foster Furcolo wanted to appoint himself to the open Senate seat. The Kennedys summarily demanded that he appoint a placeholder, to keep the seat warm for Teddy, who hadn’t turned 30 yet. Furcolo complied.

Two years later, when Teddy finally got his chance to take the family seat, his opponent was Eddie McCormack, the attorney general and himself a member of a (lesser) dynasty from South Boston.

In their televised debate, McCormack pointed a finger at Edward Moore Kennedy and sneered, “If your name were Edward Moore, your candidacy would be a joke.”

So true. The Kennedy candidacy was a joke. And now, after all these years, it appears the voters of Massachusetts have finally gotten the joke.

Buy Howie’s books about the family’s scandals — “Kennedy Babylon,” Vols. 1 and 2 — at howiecarrshow.com.



To: THE ANT who wrote (161865)8/30/2020 10:28:45 AM
From: twmoore  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217792
 
My brother (76) is in the early stages of Parkinsons.
Says that dementia is possible in the later stages.
Anyone here have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
PS:I am much older than him. (78)



To: THE ANT who wrote (161865)9/9/2020 9:56:49 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217792
 
Feb 5, 2010,04:35pm EST

Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic




Michael FumentoSubscriber

This article is more than 10 years old.



The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying "The sky is falling!" like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. "The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible," the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this "description," but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."

Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. "We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health," he said.

They're right. This wasn't merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.

Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it's far tamer than that.

Indeed, judging by what we've seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we're seeing elsewhere in the world, we'll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That's because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.

Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?

Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide--the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO's own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.

But how could the organization declare a pandemic when its own official definition required "simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness." Severity--that is, the number of deaths--is crucial, because every year flu causes "a global spread of disease."

Easy. In May, in what it admitted was a direct response to the outbreak of swine flu the month before, WHO promulgated a new definition matched to swine flu that simply eliminated severity as a factor. You could now have a pandemic with zero deaths.

Under fire, the organization is boldly lying about the change, to which anybody with an Internet connection can attest. In a mid-January virtual conference WHO swine flu chief Keiji Fukuda stated: "Did WHO change its definition of a pandemic? The answer is no: WHO did not change its definition." Two weeks later at a PACE conference he insisted: "Having severe deaths has never been part of the WHO definition."

They did it; but why?

In part, it was CYA for the WHO. The agency was losing credibility over the refusal of avian flu H5N1 to go pandemic and kill as many as 150 million people worldwide, as its "flu czar" had predicted in 2005.

Around the world nations heeded the warnings and spent vast sums developing vaccines and making other preparations. So when swine flu conveniently trotted in, the WHO essentially crossed out "avian," inserted "swine," and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan arrogantly boasted, "The world can now reap the benefits of investments over the last five years in pandemic preparedness."

But there's more than bureaucratic self-interest at work here. Bizarrely enough, the WHO has also exploited its phony pandemic to push a hard left political agenda.

In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said "ministers of health" should take advantage of the "devastating impact" swine flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that "changes in the functioning of the global economy" are needed to "distribute wealth on the basis of" values "like community, solidarity, equity and social justice." She further declared it should be used as a weapon against "international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs."

Chan's dream now lies in tatters. All the WHO has done, says PACE's Wodart, is to destroy "much of the credibility that they should have, which is invaluable to us if there's a future scare that might turn out to be a killer on a large scale."

Michael Fumento is director of the nonprofit Independent Journalism Project, where he specializes in health and science issues. He may be reached at fumento@pobox.com.

Read more Forbes Opinions here.



Michael Fumento